SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Just about every economist who supports bailing out the banks thinks
that taking an equity stake through a direct infusion of capital is the
way to go. While Secretary Paulson had pushed for his buying bad assets
approach, he is now playing Hamlet and flirting with the idea of going
the equity route.
This is not the time for high school drama. Doesn't Paulson remember
his comments from the last two weeks when he told us that the economy
would collapse if Congress didn't act immediately? Those statements
were not true, and obviously Paulson didn't believe them, since it has
now been a week since he got his bill and we still don't have even the
outlines of his plans for buying bad assets.
We could harp on the bad faith shown by the administration in using
unwarranted fear to force Congress into hurriedly passing the bailout
bill. We could also harp on the horrible media coverage on this issue,
with the media acting almost as an appendage to the Bush administration
in its efforts to increase public support for the bill.
But the immediate issue is to get the Treasury to actually do
something to help the economy. That means using its $700 billion in the
most effective way possible by directly injecting capital into the
banking system. What will it take to get Paulson to move?
Â
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Just about every economist who supports bailing out the banks thinks
that taking an equity stake through a direct infusion of capital is the
way to go. While Secretary Paulson had pushed for his buying bad assets
approach, he is now playing Hamlet and flirting with the idea of going
the equity route.
This is not the time for high school drama. Doesn't Paulson remember
his comments from the last two weeks when he told us that the economy
would collapse if Congress didn't act immediately? Those statements
were not true, and obviously Paulson didn't believe them, since it has
now been a week since he got his bill and we still don't have even the
outlines of his plans for buying bad assets.
We could harp on the bad faith shown by the administration in using
unwarranted fear to force Congress into hurriedly passing the bailout
bill. We could also harp on the horrible media coverage on this issue,
with the media acting almost as an appendage to the Bush administration
in its efforts to increase public support for the bill.
But the immediate issue is to get the Treasury to actually do
something to help the economy. That means using its $700 billion in the
most effective way possible by directly injecting capital into the
banking system. What will it take to get Paulson to move?
Â
Just about every economist who supports bailing out the banks thinks
that taking an equity stake through a direct infusion of capital is the
way to go. While Secretary Paulson had pushed for his buying bad assets
approach, he is now playing Hamlet and flirting with the idea of going
the equity route.
This is not the time for high school drama. Doesn't Paulson remember
his comments from the last two weeks when he told us that the economy
would collapse if Congress didn't act immediately? Those statements
were not true, and obviously Paulson didn't believe them, since it has
now been a week since he got his bill and we still don't have even the
outlines of his plans for buying bad assets.
We could harp on the bad faith shown by the administration in using
unwarranted fear to force Congress into hurriedly passing the bailout
bill. We could also harp on the horrible media coverage on this issue,
with the media acting almost as an appendage to the Bush administration
in its efforts to increase public support for the bill.
But the immediate issue is to get the Treasury to actually do
something to help the economy. That means using its $700 billion in the
most effective way possible by directly injecting capital into the
banking system. What will it take to get Paulson to move?
Â