SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A Plea of Innocence and a Plea for Humanity
On Wednesday, May 28th, the trial for thirty-five people arrested at the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11, 2008 -- the date that marked six years of torture and abuse at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay -- continued. The government rested their case and the defendants -- who are representing themselves -- began to mount their case, citing international law, the U.S. Constitution and outrage at the degradation of human rights as motivations for their witness.
May 29, 2008
On Wednesday, May 28th, the trial for thirty-five people arrested at the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11, 2008 -- the date that marked six years of torture and abuse at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay -- continued. The government rested their case and the defendants -- who are representing themselves -- began to mount their case, citing international law, the U.S. Constitution and outrage at the degradation of human rights as motivations for their witness.
The 35 were part of a group of more than 80 people arrested in an appeal to the highest court on behalf of those at Guantanamo. Most of those arrested were taken into custody without their own identification and announced that they were acting on behalf of a Guantanamo prisoner.
As these activists go to trial, their act of taking a "Guantanamo name" symbolically grants the Guantanamo prisoner their day in court -- a day that the Pentagon has denied them for years.
Sherrill Hogen, a 69-year-old retired social worker from Western Massachusetts, gave one of the opening statements in the trial. Sherrill carried the name Ahmed Mohammed on January 11th and into the court room. Sherrill felt compelled to participate in the protest at the Supreme Court because detainees are being tortured at Guantanamo: "Torture is a product of a sick society, of leaders bloated by power and fear, and is the antithesis of human goodness, compassion and love. I don't think I have a choice about where to put my energies."
Your Honor,
Having only you to appeal to, and holding therefore that you represent the best judgment of the American people, based on our Constitution, which has shaped our democracy and protected the rights of the individual, we bring to you our plea of innocence.
We are charged with Disorderly Conduct and Unlawful Assembly. But these were neither our purpose nor our intent. Rather, we came to the Supreme Court in our Capitol, because it has jurisdiction over the two issues about which we knew there were violations of justice: The denial of habeus corpus to the prisoners held by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the use and acceptance of torture as a legitimate practice by representatives of the U.S. government.
We came deliberately and peacefully to the branch of the government that has the authority to protect prisoners' right to be heard in their own defense and to be treated humanely. We respect the Constitution too much, not too little, and we believed that the Supreme Court is the very place that would listen, even as today we believe that you, Judge Gardner, will listen.
Because we believe that you will uphold the supreme law of the land and the absolute imperative of citizens to protest when that law is violated by our government.
As you will hear from our witnesses, we came to shed light on a crime being committed in our names, so that justice might be rendered to people in the custody of the United States of America.
To learn more about the trial, the defendants and the movement to shut down Guantanamo, visit www.witnesstorture.org
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On Wednesday, May 28th, the trial for thirty-five people arrested at the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11, 2008 -- the date that marked six years of torture and abuse at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay -- continued. The government rested their case and the defendants -- who are representing themselves -- began to mount their case, citing international law, the U.S. Constitution and outrage at the degradation of human rights as motivations for their witness.
The 35 were part of a group of more than 80 people arrested in an appeal to the highest court on behalf of those at Guantanamo. Most of those arrested were taken into custody without their own identification and announced that they were acting on behalf of a Guantanamo prisoner.
As these activists go to trial, their act of taking a "Guantanamo name" symbolically grants the Guantanamo prisoner their day in court -- a day that the Pentagon has denied them for years.
Sherrill Hogen, a 69-year-old retired social worker from Western Massachusetts, gave one of the opening statements in the trial. Sherrill carried the name Ahmed Mohammed on January 11th and into the court room. Sherrill felt compelled to participate in the protest at the Supreme Court because detainees are being tortured at Guantanamo: "Torture is a product of a sick society, of leaders bloated by power and fear, and is the antithesis of human goodness, compassion and love. I don't think I have a choice about where to put my energies."
Your Honor,
Having only you to appeal to, and holding therefore that you represent the best judgment of the American people, based on our Constitution, which has shaped our democracy and protected the rights of the individual, we bring to you our plea of innocence.
We are charged with Disorderly Conduct and Unlawful Assembly. But these were neither our purpose nor our intent. Rather, we came to the Supreme Court in our Capitol, because it has jurisdiction over the two issues about which we knew there were violations of justice: The denial of habeus corpus to the prisoners held by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the use and acceptance of torture as a legitimate practice by representatives of the U.S. government.
We came deliberately and peacefully to the branch of the government that has the authority to protect prisoners' right to be heard in their own defense and to be treated humanely. We respect the Constitution too much, not too little, and we believed that the Supreme Court is the very place that would listen, even as today we believe that you, Judge Gardner, will listen.
Because we believe that you will uphold the supreme law of the land and the absolute imperative of citizens to protest when that law is violated by our government.
As you will hear from our witnesses, we came to shed light on a crime being committed in our names, so that justice might be rendered to people in the custody of the United States of America.
To learn more about the trial, the defendants and the movement to shut down Guantanamo, visit www.witnesstorture.org
On Wednesday, May 28th, the trial for thirty-five people arrested at the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11, 2008 -- the date that marked six years of torture and abuse at the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay -- continued. The government rested their case and the defendants -- who are representing themselves -- began to mount their case, citing international law, the U.S. Constitution and outrage at the degradation of human rights as motivations for their witness.
The 35 were part of a group of more than 80 people arrested in an appeal to the highest court on behalf of those at Guantanamo. Most of those arrested were taken into custody without their own identification and announced that they were acting on behalf of a Guantanamo prisoner.
As these activists go to trial, their act of taking a "Guantanamo name" symbolically grants the Guantanamo prisoner their day in court -- a day that the Pentagon has denied them for years.
Sherrill Hogen, a 69-year-old retired social worker from Western Massachusetts, gave one of the opening statements in the trial. Sherrill carried the name Ahmed Mohammed on January 11th and into the court room. Sherrill felt compelled to participate in the protest at the Supreme Court because detainees are being tortured at Guantanamo: "Torture is a product of a sick society, of leaders bloated by power and fear, and is the antithesis of human goodness, compassion and love. I don't think I have a choice about where to put my energies."
Your Honor,
Having only you to appeal to, and holding therefore that you represent the best judgment of the American people, based on our Constitution, which has shaped our democracy and protected the rights of the individual, we bring to you our plea of innocence.
We are charged with Disorderly Conduct and Unlawful Assembly. But these were neither our purpose nor our intent. Rather, we came to the Supreme Court in our Capitol, because it has jurisdiction over the two issues about which we knew there were violations of justice: The denial of habeus corpus to the prisoners held by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the use and acceptance of torture as a legitimate practice by representatives of the U.S. government.
We came deliberately and peacefully to the branch of the government that has the authority to protect prisoners' right to be heard in their own defense and to be treated humanely. We respect the Constitution too much, not too little, and we believed that the Supreme Court is the very place that would listen, even as today we believe that you, Judge Gardner, will listen.
Because we believe that you will uphold the supreme law of the land and the absolute imperative of citizens to protest when that law is violated by our government.
As you will hear from our witnesses, we came to shed light on a crime being committed in our names, so that justice might be rendered to people in the custody of the United States of America.
To learn more about the trial, the defendants and the movement to shut down Guantanamo, visit www.witnesstorture.org
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.