SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
He is taking them on. He has been a one man feeding trough for years. He now fights back.
The media is a tricky opponent to tackle. Once you confront one, like a pack, the reporters and pundits defend their own by attacking the person who had the temerity to question the motivation and syntax of a question or statement from a purported neutral journalist.
To challenge a questioner is fair. The unspoken contract however is - we ask the questions and set the dialogue and you just deal with it. Squirm, parse and blush - "that's the moment we're looking for" - that's the franchise and when you mess with the franchise by observing something different than the ostensible paradigm, the pack closes in.
Bill Clinton stepped over a line by saying "Shame on you" to a reporter he felt was not being a journalist but was behaving like a Howard Stern kamikaze. Bill gave the same lashing to Chris Wallace on Fox - he called him on his agenda. It's a moment and a movement the rest of us should rally behind.
We don't need to care how it happens or in whose name he's doing it - he has earned the right and has been educated in the ways of the questioners and he should and must respond. If the "brotherhood and sisterhood" of the media want to corner and contain him, we should resist on his behalf. Let him loose on them. He knows. He's on to them. He has moved from people-pleasing and being chastened to standing up against the agenda being set by careerists posing as journalists.
Let him be radical - let him speak - let's not demand he be cautious. Let the calluses and cauterizing education he endured take the stage on behalf of his wife candidate. I think it's a most unusual and thrilling development and let it go. Don't let them tell us he's inappropriate or divisive - he's on it.
Unleash him. Immunize him from the taming the press is hoping they'll be able to achieve with him. Let him be impolite. Let him say what he sees. He's earned it - he's been on death's doorstep both politically and physically. Let his smart wife organize and create a genius coalition of government if that's what she's fixing to do - and let him speak.
I want finally to hear what he has to say because now he's dangerous and dangerous is what is required. How he got there is unique - but he's there. He's doing something right - whatever wrong he might have done in the past does not cancel out this moment, and nor should we - and nor should we allow the out-of-control and controlling franchise to make it stylish to be critical of what he's doing. Let him be. He's prime time - and his real time is now.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
He is taking them on. He has been a one man feeding trough for years. He now fights back.
The media is a tricky opponent to tackle. Once you confront one, like a pack, the reporters and pundits defend their own by attacking the person who had the temerity to question the motivation and syntax of a question or statement from a purported neutral journalist.
To challenge a questioner is fair. The unspoken contract however is - we ask the questions and set the dialogue and you just deal with it. Squirm, parse and blush - "that's the moment we're looking for" - that's the franchise and when you mess with the franchise by observing something different than the ostensible paradigm, the pack closes in.
Bill Clinton stepped over a line by saying "Shame on you" to a reporter he felt was not being a journalist but was behaving like a Howard Stern kamikaze. Bill gave the same lashing to Chris Wallace on Fox - he called him on his agenda. It's a moment and a movement the rest of us should rally behind.
We don't need to care how it happens or in whose name he's doing it - he has earned the right and has been educated in the ways of the questioners and he should and must respond. If the "brotherhood and sisterhood" of the media want to corner and contain him, we should resist on his behalf. Let him loose on them. He knows. He's on to them. He has moved from people-pleasing and being chastened to standing up against the agenda being set by careerists posing as journalists.
Let him be radical - let him speak - let's not demand he be cautious. Let the calluses and cauterizing education he endured take the stage on behalf of his wife candidate. I think it's a most unusual and thrilling development and let it go. Don't let them tell us he's inappropriate or divisive - he's on it.
Unleash him. Immunize him from the taming the press is hoping they'll be able to achieve with him. Let him be impolite. Let him say what he sees. He's earned it - he's been on death's doorstep both politically and physically. Let his smart wife organize and create a genius coalition of government if that's what she's fixing to do - and let him speak.
I want finally to hear what he has to say because now he's dangerous and dangerous is what is required. How he got there is unique - but he's there. He's doing something right - whatever wrong he might have done in the past does not cancel out this moment, and nor should we - and nor should we allow the out-of-control and controlling franchise to make it stylish to be critical of what he's doing. Let him be. He's prime time - and his real time is now.
He is taking them on. He has been a one man feeding trough for years. He now fights back.
The media is a tricky opponent to tackle. Once you confront one, like a pack, the reporters and pundits defend their own by attacking the person who had the temerity to question the motivation and syntax of a question or statement from a purported neutral journalist.
To challenge a questioner is fair. The unspoken contract however is - we ask the questions and set the dialogue and you just deal with it. Squirm, parse and blush - "that's the moment we're looking for" - that's the franchise and when you mess with the franchise by observing something different than the ostensible paradigm, the pack closes in.
Bill Clinton stepped over a line by saying "Shame on you" to a reporter he felt was not being a journalist but was behaving like a Howard Stern kamikaze. Bill gave the same lashing to Chris Wallace on Fox - he called him on his agenda. It's a moment and a movement the rest of us should rally behind.
We don't need to care how it happens or in whose name he's doing it - he has earned the right and has been educated in the ways of the questioners and he should and must respond. If the "brotherhood and sisterhood" of the media want to corner and contain him, we should resist on his behalf. Let him loose on them. He knows. He's on to them. He has moved from people-pleasing and being chastened to standing up against the agenda being set by careerists posing as journalists.
Let him be radical - let him speak - let's not demand he be cautious. Let the calluses and cauterizing education he endured take the stage on behalf of his wife candidate. I think it's a most unusual and thrilling development and let it go. Don't let them tell us he's inappropriate or divisive - he's on it.
Unleash him. Immunize him from the taming the press is hoping they'll be able to achieve with him. Let him be impolite. Let him say what he sees. He's earned it - he's been on death's doorstep both politically and physically. Let his smart wife organize and create a genius coalition of government if that's what she's fixing to do - and let him speak.
I want finally to hear what he has to say because now he's dangerous and dangerous is what is required. How he got there is unique - but he's there. He's doing something right - whatever wrong he might have done in the past does not cancel out this moment, and nor should we - and nor should we allow the out-of-control and controlling franchise to make it stylish to be critical of what he's doing. Let him be. He's prime time - and his real time is now.