SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Nicole Richie's new baby daughter is not Paris Hilton's latest purse, or even her chihuahua.
Neither is Christina Aguilera's new son, Courtney Thorne-Smith's new boy or the soon-to-be spawn of Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lopez, Halle Berry, or even Britney's 16-year-old sister Jamie Lynn Spears.
Babies, babies everywhere.
In the U.S., the birth rate among teenagers aged 15 to 19 has shot up after 14 years of declining. In Canada, at least as of 2004, it's been contracting, while the abortion rate has been heading up.
And yet, the celebrity baby bumps assault us all at the supermarket checkouts. So why the difference?
Understand that there's no evidence girls are having babies because it's the thing to do - although, in the U.S., they're being applauded for doing it while being condemned for doing IT.
So, if you're looking for where to put the blame for the bump in teen babymaking in the U.S., try the George W. Bush administration's abstinence-only sex education, parental notification/consent laws and changes to the Medicaid drug rebate law that has doubled and tripled the cost of contraception on college campuses - all things to stand on guard against in Canada.
That, plus a religious-political climate that has put the historic Roe v. Wade decision in jeopardy.
Even here, but at a far lower rate, girls are getting knocked up because some school systems don't counsel them on choices. They don't know how to get contraception, or can't afford it. The rubber broke. Or boys are also not taking any responsibility for their actions.
It takes two to bango and it's always the girls who bear the brunt - and the baby. (Meanwhile, boys get bragging rights and the ability to get on with life visibly, if not emotionally, unscathed.)
So let's kill the notion that girls are getting pregnant because they want to be just like Jessica Alba - although they may well want to be just like Jessica Alba, only not pregnant. They're not stupid enough to think that having a child, dropping out of school, as 51 per cent of U.S. teen mothers do, and living in hardship is as glamorous as the lives of Madonna, Angelina or Katie.
But, just when the hit movie Juno debuted last month, the news about the climbing teen birth rate hit the headlines. Everybody began drawing connections to celeb baby mania and the recent spate of other flicks about unplanned pregnancies (Knocked Up, Waitress, Bella, Quinceanera) that end so cute you want to have morning sickness in your popcorn bag.
That's because, in Hollywoodland, the pregnancies bring all sorts of wonderful things to the pregnant characters - career boosts, huge inheritances, pie shops, toad-fathers-turned-into-Prince Charmings.
Not so much in real life. Which isn't surprising. That's show biz.
But is the entertainment industry so cowed by the religious hordes - or incapable of conceiving a strong woman who chooses not to go to term - that it can't come up with a script that doesn't end with a crib?
Maybe not: Not only does the U.S. have the highest teen pregnancy rate in the industrialized world - more than double that of Canada's - it also makes it harder for women to get abortions.
No wonder the option of, as it was so famously put in Knocked Up, "shashmortion'' is quickly dismissed, if it's ever discussed. From Murphy Brown to Friends' Rachel, Sex and the City's Miranda Hobbes, it's all about bringing up baby.
And so, only about a third of U.S. teens terminate their pregnancies. Canadian stats, although not as recent, show that about two-thirds of teens choose abortion.
The cultural difference is so sharp that U.S. networks have yet to air, uncut, the 1989 episodes of Canada's Degrassi High in which a pregnant teen fights her way through shouting demonstrators at an abortion clinic. By contrast, the lone protestor in Juno is a girl from the title character's high school, who scares off Juno by telling her that the fetus already has fingernails.
Which scenario is more realistic?
If I were young, scared and pregnant, I wouldn't want to run the gauntlet of placard-waving protestors telling me I was going to hell, that's for sure.
I'd want to be in Canada where choice is still a choice.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Nicole Richie's new baby daughter is not Paris Hilton's latest purse, or even her chihuahua.
Neither is Christina Aguilera's new son, Courtney Thorne-Smith's new boy or the soon-to-be spawn of Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lopez, Halle Berry, or even Britney's 16-year-old sister Jamie Lynn Spears.
Babies, babies everywhere.
In the U.S., the birth rate among teenagers aged 15 to 19 has shot up after 14 years of declining. In Canada, at least as of 2004, it's been contracting, while the abortion rate has been heading up.
And yet, the celebrity baby bumps assault us all at the supermarket checkouts. So why the difference?
Understand that there's no evidence girls are having babies because it's the thing to do - although, in the U.S., they're being applauded for doing it while being condemned for doing IT.
So, if you're looking for where to put the blame for the bump in teen babymaking in the U.S., try the George W. Bush administration's abstinence-only sex education, parental notification/consent laws and changes to the Medicaid drug rebate law that has doubled and tripled the cost of contraception on college campuses - all things to stand on guard against in Canada.
That, plus a religious-political climate that has put the historic Roe v. Wade decision in jeopardy.
Even here, but at a far lower rate, girls are getting knocked up because some school systems don't counsel them on choices. They don't know how to get contraception, or can't afford it. The rubber broke. Or boys are also not taking any responsibility for their actions.
It takes two to bango and it's always the girls who bear the brunt - and the baby. (Meanwhile, boys get bragging rights and the ability to get on with life visibly, if not emotionally, unscathed.)
So let's kill the notion that girls are getting pregnant because they want to be just like Jessica Alba - although they may well want to be just like Jessica Alba, only not pregnant. They're not stupid enough to think that having a child, dropping out of school, as 51 per cent of U.S. teen mothers do, and living in hardship is as glamorous as the lives of Madonna, Angelina or Katie.
But, just when the hit movie Juno debuted last month, the news about the climbing teen birth rate hit the headlines. Everybody began drawing connections to celeb baby mania and the recent spate of other flicks about unplanned pregnancies (Knocked Up, Waitress, Bella, Quinceanera) that end so cute you want to have morning sickness in your popcorn bag.
That's because, in Hollywoodland, the pregnancies bring all sorts of wonderful things to the pregnant characters - career boosts, huge inheritances, pie shops, toad-fathers-turned-into-Prince Charmings.
Not so much in real life. Which isn't surprising. That's show biz.
But is the entertainment industry so cowed by the religious hordes - or incapable of conceiving a strong woman who chooses not to go to term - that it can't come up with a script that doesn't end with a crib?
Maybe not: Not only does the U.S. have the highest teen pregnancy rate in the industrialized world - more than double that of Canada's - it also makes it harder for women to get abortions.
No wonder the option of, as it was so famously put in Knocked Up, "shashmortion'' is quickly dismissed, if it's ever discussed. From Murphy Brown to Friends' Rachel, Sex and the City's Miranda Hobbes, it's all about bringing up baby.
And so, only about a third of U.S. teens terminate their pregnancies. Canadian stats, although not as recent, show that about two-thirds of teens choose abortion.
The cultural difference is so sharp that U.S. networks have yet to air, uncut, the 1989 episodes of Canada's Degrassi High in which a pregnant teen fights her way through shouting demonstrators at an abortion clinic. By contrast, the lone protestor in Juno is a girl from the title character's high school, who scares off Juno by telling her that the fetus already has fingernails.
Which scenario is more realistic?
If I were young, scared and pregnant, I wouldn't want to run the gauntlet of placard-waving protestors telling me I was going to hell, that's for sure.
I'd want to be in Canada where choice is still a choice.
Nicole Richie's new baby daughter is not Paris Hilton's latest purse, or even her chihuahua.
Neither is Christina Aguilera's new son, Courtney Thorne-Smith's new boy or the soon-to-be spawn of Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lopez, Halle Berry, or even Britney's 16-year-old sister Jamie Lynn Spears.
Babies, babies everywhere.
In the U.S., the birth rate among teenagers aged 15 to 19 has shot up after 14 years of declining. In Canada, at least as of 2004, it's been contracting, while the abortion rate has been heading up.
And yet, the celebrity baby bumps assault us all at the supermarket checkouts. So why the difference?
Understand that there's no evidence girls are having babies because it's the thing to do - although, in the U.S., they're being applauded for doing it while being condemned for doing IT.
So, if you're looking for where to put the blame for the bump in teen babymaking in the U.S., try the George W. Bush administration's abstinence-only sex education, parental notification/consent laws and changes to the Medicaid drug rebate law that has doubled and tripled the cost of contraception on college campuses - all things to stand on guard against in Canada.
That, plus a religious-political climate that has put the historic Roe v. Wade decision in jeopardy.
Even here, but at a far lower rate, girls are getting knocked up because some school systems don't counsel them on choices. They don't know how to get contraception, or can't afford it. The rubber broke. Or boys are also not taking any responsibility for their actions.
It takes two to bango and it's always the girls who bear the brunt - and the baby. (Meanwhile, boys get bragging rights and the ability to get on with life visibly, if not emotionally, unscathed.)
So let's kill the notion that girls are getting pregnant because they want to be just like Jessica Alba - although they may well want to be just like Jessica Alba, only not pregnant. They're not stupid enough to think that having a child, dropping out of school, as 51 per cent of U.S. teen mothers do, and living in hardship is as glamorous as the lives of Madonna, Angelina or Katie.
But, just when the hit movie Juno debuted last month, the news about the climbing teen birth rate hit the headlines. Everybody began drawing connections to celeb baby mania and the recent spate of other flicks about unplanned pregnancies (Knocked Up, Waitress, Bella, Quinceanera) that end so cute you want to have morning sickness in your popcorn bag.
That's because, in Hollywoodland, the pregnancies bring all sorts of wonderful things to the pregnant characters - career boosts, huge inheritances, pie shops, toad-fathers-turned-into-Prince Charmings.
Not so much in real life. Which isn't surprising. That's show biz.
But is the entertainment industry so cowed by the religious hordes - or incapable of conceiving a strong woman who chooses not to go to term - that it can't come up with a script that doesn't end with a crib?
Maybe not: Not only does the U.S. have the highest teen pregnancy rate in the industrialized world - more than double that of Canada's - it also makes it harder for women to get abortions.
No wonder the option of, as it was so famously put in Knocked Up, "shashmortion'' is quickly dismissed, if it's ever discussed. From Murphy Brown to Friends' Rachel, Sex and the City's Miranda Hobbes, it's all about bringing up baby.
And so, only about a third of U.S. teens terminate their pregnancies. Canadian stats, although not as recent, show that about two-thirds of teens choose abortion.
The cultural difference is so sharp that U.S. networks have yet to air, uncut, the 1989 episodes of Canada's Degrassi High in which a pregnant teen fights her way through shouting demonstrators at an abortion clinic. By contrast, the lone protestor in Juno is a girl from the title character's high school, who scares off Juno by telling her that the fetus already has fingernails.
Which scenario is more realistic?
If I were young, scared and pregnant, I wouldn't want to run the gauntlet of placard-waving protestors telling me I was going to hell, that's for sure.
I'd want to be in Canada where choice is still a choice.