SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Mugshot of US Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho)
In The Men's Room
Aug 28, 2007
Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) most likely thought he was invisible - or he didn't fully exist when he was in the men's room. What was he thinking? What did he need? Could he have found someone with whom to share that part of himself in a not any less hypocritical but at least in a more discreet and less dangerous way?
It's a study. With everything to lose he indulges a need - physical, emotional, psychological - in the men's room. The seediness adds to the satisfaction and the danger feeds the compulsion. Keep this where it belongs, the married senator must have repeated to himself - with whom it belongs. Not a closet but a booth - and with someone you can't see and hope you will never see again.
In a panic he pleads guilty. Feels guilt - maybe needs guilt. Then he comes to his practical senses. He adjusts the story. He should have had counsel, he says in hindsight. But how could a senator not know that he makes no plea without advice of counsel? Did he want the mortification of the moment and the plea? Did he need the mortification?
He's a Republican senator. He voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. He voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. He voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. Does this show what he feels about sex, commitment and privacy? How he voted had nothing to do with his own human condition - or anyone else's for that matter.
I suppose this man's plight will be fodder for humorists for weeks and weeks. But it deserves serious attention and inquiry. Ambition, self-loathing, fear of hell and rejection kept him in the men's room - and in congress.
Could it be that the one redemption to a person such as Senator Craig is that he will keep doing what he hates himself for doing until he gets caught? Getting caught is the wave a person committing crimes will always try to outrun and also paddle vigorously to meet.
Lately, the standard accepted practice after getting caught is to say anything. First, do not get caught and secondly, do not admit to being caught. It has been working for the administration for several years. Say anything. Say it often and then say something else. Maybe cry. Then have someone else say anything for you. Let it be ridiculous - that helps even. If someone is scratching his head he can't point a finger.
Senator Craig is part of it - his story is graphic and pained - but so is the war and everything else about the current crumbling regime. This recent scandal is both illuminating and emblematic. All the president's men, and the president, are in the men's room explaining obscene behavior by claiming they have a wide (and principled) stance.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bill C. Davis
Bill C. Davis was a playwright, writer, actor, and political activist. He has been a contributor to Common Dreams since 2001. Bill died on February 26, 2021, at age 69, after a battle with COVID-19. Bill's Broadway debut -- "Mass Appeal," earned two Tony nominations and became a staple of community theater. Bill wrote the screenplay for the 1984 film adaptation of "Mass Appeal," starring Jack Lemmon and Zeljko Ivanek.
Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) most likely thought he was invisible - or he didn't fully exist when he was in the men's room. What was he thinking? What did he need? Could he have found someone with whom to share that part of himself in a not any less hypocritical but at least in a more discreet and less dangerous way?
It's a study. With everything to lose he indulges a need - physical, emotional, psychological - in the men's room. The seediness adds to the satisfaction and the danger feeds the compulsion. Keep this where it belongs, the married senator must have repeated to himself - with whom it belongs. Not a closet but a booth - and with someone you can't see and hope you will never see again.
In a panic he pleads guilty. Feels guilt - maybe needs guilt. Then he comes to his practical senses. He adjusts the story. He should have had counsel, he says in hindsight. But how could a senator not know that he makes no plea without advice of counsel? Did he want the mortification of the moment and the plea? Did he need the mortification?
He's a Republican senator. He voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. He voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. He voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. Does this show what he feels about sex, commitment and privacy? How he voted had nothing to do with his own human condition - or anyone else's for that matter.
I suppose this man's plight will be fodder for humorists for weeks and weeks. But it deserves serious attention and inquiry. Ambition, self-loathing, fear of hell and rejection kept him in the men's room - and in congress.
Could it be that the one redemption to a person such as Senator Craig is that he will keep doing what he hates himself for doing until he gets caught? Getting caught is the wave a person committing crimes will always try to outrun and also paddle vigorously to meet.
Lately, the standard accepted practice after getting caught is to say anything. First, do not get caught and secondly, do not admit to being caught. It has been working for the administration for several years. Say anything. Say it often and then say something else. Maybe cry. Then have someone else say anything for you. Let it be ridiculous - that helps even. If someone is scratching his head he can't point a finger.
Senator Craig is part of it - his story is graphic and pained - but so is the war and everything else about the current crumbling regime. This recent scandal is both illuminating and emblematic. All the president's men, and the president, are in the men's room explaining obscene behavior by claiming they have a wide (and principled) stance.
Bill C. Davis
Bill C. Davis was a playwright, writer, actor, and political activist. He has been a contributor to Common Dreams since 2001. Bill died on February 26, 2021, at age 69, after a battle with COVID-19. Bill's Broadway debut -- "Mass Appeal," earned two Tony nominations and became a staple of community theater. Bill wrote the screenplay for the 1984 film adaptation of "Mass Appeal," starring Jack Lemmon and Zeljko Ivanek.
Senator Larry Craig (R-Idaho) most likely thought he was invisible - or he didn't fully exist when he was in the men's room. What was he thinking? What did he need? Could he have found someone with whom to share that part of himself in a not any less hypocritical but at least in a more discreet and less dangerous way?
It's a study. With everything to lose he indulges a need - physical, emotional, psychological - in the men's room. The seediness adds to the satisfaction and the danger feeds the compulsion. Keep this where it belongs, the married senator must have repeated to himself - with whom it belongs. Not a closet but a booth - and with someone you can't see and hope you will never see again.
In a panic he pleads guilty. Feels guilt - maybe needs guilt. Then he comes to his practical senses. He adjusts the story. He should have had counsel, he says in hindsight. But how could a senator not know that he makes no plea without advice of counsel? Did he want the mortification of the moment and the plea? Did he need the mortification?
He's a Republican senator. He voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. He voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. He voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. Does this show what he feels about sex, commitment and privacy? How he voted had nothing to do with his own human condition - or anyone else's for that matter.
I suppose this man's plight will be fodder for humorists for weeks and weeks. But it deserves serious attention and inquiry. Ambition, self-loathing, fear of hell and rejection kept him in the men's room - and in congress.
Could it be that the one redemption to a person such as Senator Craig is that he will keep doing what he hates himself for doing until he gets caught? Getting caught is the wave a person committing crimes will always try to outrun and also paddle vigorously to meet.
Lately, the standard accepted practice after getting caught is to say anything. First, do not get caught and secondly, do not admit to being caught. It has been working for the administration for several years. Say anything. Say it often and then say something else. Maybe cry. Then have someone else say anything for you. Let it be ridiculous - that helps even. If someone is scratching his head he can't point a finger.
Senator Craig is part of it - his story is graphic and pained - but so is the war and everything else about the current crumbling regime. This recent scandal is both illuminating and emblematic. All the president's men, and the president, are in the men's room explaining obscene behavior by claiming they have a wide (and principled) stance.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.