SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Contemptible Conduct at Justice
Jul 25, 2007
When a senator of the president's party tells his attorney general that his "credibility has been breached to the point of being actionable," it is time for the president to stop letting loyalty blind him to that Cabinet member's incompetence and untrustworthiness. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has long since forfeited Congress's and the public's faith in his leadership of the Justice Department.
Gonzales was back before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday for questions about the White House's purge last year of nine of its own appointees as US attorneys, and about his role, as White House counsel, in a 2004 effort to get a hospitalized Attorney General John Ashcroft to approve an intelligence-gathering program that Ashcroft thought was illegal. Gonzales denied pressing Ashcroft to approve the program, which committee members believe was the administration's warrantless wiretapping of telephone calls. This is what prompted Republican Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania to warn Gonzales that he might be perjuring himself.
The committee had heard a quite different account of the hospital episode from Ashcroft's deputy, James Comey. He told Congress in May that Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, had put pressure on Ashcroft while he was in intensive care after surgery to OK the intelligence-gathering program, which Comey declined to describe in detail. Comey said that he, Ashcroft, and FBI head Robert Mueller had threatened to resign over the program until the administration modified it.
Concerning the firing of the US attorneys, Gonzales refused to answer questions yesterday, on the curious grounds that his involvement in the decisions disqualified him from doing so. Both the Senate and House judiciary committees are trying to determine if the purge was motivated by politics. Several of the fired attorneys had either prosecuted Republican officeholders or decided not to bring charges in cases of alleged voting fraud by Democrats.
The congressional inquiries have been stymied by the refusal of Bush aides to testify on the grounds of executive privilege. Congress has threatened to cite them for contempt, but this week the White House said it would order the Justice Department not to prosecute any of the aides for contempt of Congress.
The brazenness of that interference in the function of Congress and the courts caused Specter yesterday to ask Gonzales, "Do you think constitutional government in the United States can survive if the president has the unilateral authority to reject congressional inquiries?" Gonzales, predictably, refused to answer. But the question will not go away, as Congress tries to determine the depths to which Bush's unfit attorney general has brought the nation's once-respected Department of Justice.
(c) 2007 The Boston Globe
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Boston Globe
When a senator of the president's party tells his attorney general that his "credibility has been breached to the point of being actionable," it is time for the president to stop letting loyalty blind him to that Cabinet member's incompetence and untrustworthiness. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has long since forfeited Congress's and the public's faith in his leadership of the Justice Department.
Gonzales was back before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday for questions about the White House's purge last year of nine of its own appointees as US attorneys, and about his role, as White House counsel, in a 2004 effort to get a hospitalized Attorney General John Ashcroft to approve an intelligence-gathering program that Ashcroft thought was illegal. Gonzales denied pressing Ashcroft to approve the program, which committee members believe was the administration's warrantless wiretapping of telephone calls. This is what prompted Republican Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania to warn Gonzales that he might be perjuring himself.
The committee had heard a quite different account of the hospital episode from Ashcroft's deputy, James Comey. He told Congress in May that Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, had put pressure on Ashcroft while he was in intensive care after surgery to OK the intelligence-gathering program, which Comey declined to describe in detail. Comey said that he, Ashcroft, and FBI head Robert Mueller had threatened to resign over the program until the administration modified it.
Concerning the firing of the US attorneys, Gonzales refused to answer questions yesterday, on the curious grounds that his involvement in the decisions disqualified him from doing so. Both the Senate and House judiciary committees are trying to determine if the purge was motivated by politics. Several of the fired attorneys had either prosecuted Republican officeholders or decided not to bring charges in cases of alleged voting fraud by Democrats.
The congressional inquiries have been stymied by the refusal of Bush aides to testify on the grounds of executive privilege. Congress has threatened to cite them for contempt, but this week the White House said it would order the Justice Department not to prosecute any of the aides for contempt of Congress.
The brazenness of that interference in the function of Congress and the courts caused Specter yesterday to ask Gonzales, "Do you think constitutional government in the United States can survive if the president has the unilateral authority to reject congressional inquiries?" Gonzales, predictably, refused to answer. But the question will not go away, as Congress tries to determine the depths to which Bush's unfit attorney general has brought the nation's once-respected Department of Justice.
(c) 2007 The Boston Globe
When a senator of the president's party tells his attorney general that his "credibility has been breached to the point of being actionable," it is time for the president to stop letting loyalty blind him to that Cabinet member's incompetence and untrustworthiness. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has long since forfeited Congress's and the public's faith in his leadership of the Justice Department.
Gonzales was back before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday for questions about the White House's purge last year of nine of its own appointees as US attorneys, and about his role, as White House counsel, in a 2004 effort to get a hospitalized Attorney General John Ashcroft to approve an intelligence-gathering program that Ashcroft thought was illegal. Gonzales denied pressing Ashcroft to approve the program, which committee members believe was the administration's warrantless wiretapping of telephone calls. This is what prompted Republican Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania to warn Gonzales that he might be perjuring himself.
The committee had heard a quite different account of the hospital episode from Ashcroft's deputy, James Comey. He told Congress in May that Gonzales and President Bush's chief of staff, Andrew Card, had put pressure on Ashcroft while he was in intensive care after surgery to OK the intelligence-gathering program, which Comey declined to describe in detail. Comey said that he, Ashcroft, and FBI head Robert Mueller had threatened to resign over the program until the administration modified it.
Concerning the firing of the US attorneys, Gonzales refused to answer questions yesterday, on the curious grounds that his involvement in the decisions disqualified him from doing so. Both the Senate and House judiciary committees are trying to determine if the purge was motivated by politics. Several of the fired attorneys had either prosecuted Republican officeholders or decided not to bring charges in cases of alleged voting fraud by Democrats.
The congressional inquiries have been stymied by the refusal of Bush aides to testify on the grounds of executive privilege. Congress has threatened to cite them for contempt, but this week the White House said it would order the Justice Department not to prosecute any of the aides for contempt of Congress.
The brazenness of that interference in the function of Congress and the courts caused Specter yesterday to ask Gonzales, "Do you think constitutional government in the United States can survive if the president has the unilateral authority to reject congressional inquiries?" Gonzales, predictably, refused to answer. But the question will not go away, as Congress tries to determine the depths to which Bush's unfit attorney general has brought the nation's once-respected Department of Justice.
(c) 2007 The Boston Globe
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.