SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
No Time for Compromise on Iraqi Withdrawal
May 03, 2007
The Democrats must stand strong against the current of compromise that is swirling around Washington concerning the funding of the Iraq War.After Bush's veto, there has already been lots of talk on Capitol Hill about crafting an acceptable bill.
But no bill is acceptable that continues funding for this war and this occupation.
The American people want out, the U.S. soldiers want out, and the Iraqis are demanding that we leave. A majority of Iraqis think it's acceptable to kill Americans there. We can't win that way.
Yet the Democrats are seriously contemplating a compromise on an already compromised bill. Now, rather than insist on a deadline for withdrawal that was fudge-able in the first place, they appear to be ready to settle for no deadline at all, just some unenforceable benchmarks for the Maliki government.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer expects a new bill to pass in the House in two weeks and to become law by Memorial Day. "We're not going to leave our troops in harm's way . . . without the resources they need," he said.
But resources for what?
For continuing the occupation?
Or for getting the hell out of there?
Nancy Pelosi wasn't exactly crystal clear in her statement on the President's veto. The Speaker said the original bill "honored and respected the wishes of the American people to have benchmarks, to have guidelines, to have standards for what is happening in Iraq."
Those weren't the wishes of the American people.
Their wishes were to bring the troops home within a year.
Now it looks like the Democratic leadership is going to cave even more.
Last week, in the context of Iraq, Harry Reid tipped his hand, saying, "I'm a legislator, and I believe legislating is the art of compromise."
There may be times to compromise.
But this is not one of them.
There is no art in continuing to pay for a foolish, bloody war.
The Democrats need to find the courage to withstand the slurs from Bush and Cheney and their parrots on Fox News and rightwing radio.
They need to defund the war. That is their moral duty, and they have the clear constitutional authority to do their duty. Not compromise.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The Democrats must stand strong against the current of compromise that is swirling around Washington concerning the funding of the Iraq War.After Bush's veto, there has already been lots of talk on Capitol Hill about crafting an acceptable bill.
But no bill is acceptable that continues funding for this war and this occupation.
The American people want out, the U.S. soldiers want out, and the Iraqis are demanding that we leave. A majority of Iraqis think it's acceptable to kill Americans there. We can't win that way.
Yet the Democrats are seriously contemplating a compromise on an already compromised bill. Now, rather than insist on a deadline for withdrawal that was fudge-able in the first place, they appear to be ready to settle for no deadline at all, just some unenforceable benchmarks for the Maliki government.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer expects a new bill to pass in the House in two weeks and to become law by Memorial Day. "We're not going to leave our troops in harm's way . . . without the resources they need," he said.
But resources for what?
For continuing the occupation?
Or for getting the hell out of there?
Nancy Pelosi wasn't exactly crystal clear in her statement on the President's veto. The Speaker said the original bill "honored and respected the wishes of the American people to have benchmarks, to have guidelines, to have standards for what is happening in Iraq."
Those weren't the wishes of the American people.
Their wishes were to bring the troops home within a year.
Now it looks like the Democratic leadership is going to cave even more.
Last week, in the context of Iraq, Harry Reid tipped his hand, saying, "I'm a legislator, and I believe legislating is the art of compromise."
There may be times to compromise.
But this is not one of them.
There is no art in continuing to pay for a foolish, bloody war.
The Democrats need to find the courage to withstand the slurs from Bush and Cheney and their parrots on Fox News and rightwing radio.
They need to defund the war. That is their moral duty, and they have the clear constitutional authority to do their duty. Not compromise.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The Democrats must stand strong against the current of compromise that is swirling around Washington concerning the funding of the Iraq War.After Bush's veto, there has already been lots of talk on Capitol Hill about crafting an acceptable bill.
But no bill is acceptable that continues funding for this war and this occupation.
The American people want out, the U.S. soldiers want out, and the Iraqis are demanding that we leave. A majority of Iraqis think it's acceptable to kill Americans there. We can't win that way.
Yet the Democrats are seriously contemplating a compromise on an already compromised bill. Now, rather than insist on a deadline for withdrawal that was fudge-able in the first place, they appear to be ready to settle for no deadline at all, just some unenforceable benchmarks for the Maliki government.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer expects a new bill to pass in the House in two weeks and to become law by Memorial Day. "We're not going to leave our troops in harm's way . . . without the resources they need," he said.
But resources for what?
For continuing the occupation?
Or for getting the hell out of there?
Nancy Pelosi wasn't exactly crystal clear in her statement on the President's veto. The Speaker said the original bill "honored and respected the wishes of the American people to have benchmarks, to have guidelines, to have standards for what is happening in Iraq."
Those weren't the wishes of the American people.
Their wishes were to bring the troops home within a year.
Now it looks like the Democratic leadership is going to cave even more.
Last week, in the context of Iraq, Harry Reid tipped his hand, saying, "I'm a legislator, and I believe legislating is the art of compromise."
There may be times to compromise.
But this is not one of them.
There is no art in continuing to pay for a foolish, bloody war.
The Democrats need to find the courage to withstand the slurs from Bush and Cheney and their parrots on Fox News and rightwing radio.
They need to defund the war. That is their moral duty, and they have the clear constitutional authority to do their duty. Not compromise.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.