Bush Plays Superhero in Iraq
Bush just raised the stakes again in Iraq.
In his defiant speech Wednesday morning, he cast the battle in Iraq in the starkest terms yet. It's a battle, he said, against "pure evil."
Bush now says the war in Iraq is against "pure evil." But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
On cue, he then dragged on stage his favorite prop, 9/11, adding: "That evil is the same evil that inspired and rejoiced in the attack of 2001. And that evil must be defeated so we don't face it here again."
This language returns Bush to his most messianic, as when, after 9/11, he vowed to "rid the world of evil."
This is an impossible task, surely, and for Bush to assign it to himself is not only deluded, it's disastrous.
Especially in the context of Iraq.
For if the battle in Iraq is against "pure evil," the United States can never leave there until "pure evil" is vanquished.
But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
"See, we're going after killers," Bush said, and it doesn't matter whether they are Shiites or Sunnis. "Murderers are murderers," he said.
The civil war in Iraq is not some comic book, though. And rather than even acknowledge, as the Pentagon belatedly has done, that the situation there is indeed a civil war, Bush vaulted over that term in favor of the Big E.
By defining the situation in Iraq in such simplistic terms, Bush misconstrues the dynamics on the ground and consigns our troops to an endless quest.
Even he seemed to signal that it's going to go on for quite a while, as he stressed that the Baghdad escalation is just the "opening salvo in a sustained effort."
But it's unsustainable, and unwinnable.
And no more U.S. troops, no more Iraqi civilians, should be killed or wounded because of Bush's superhero fantasies.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Bush just raised the stakes again in Iraq.
In his defiant speech Wednesday morning, he cast the battle in Iraq in the starkest terms yet. It's a battle, he said, against "pure evil."
Bush now says the war in Iraq is against "pure evil." But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
On cue, he then dragged on stage his favorite prop, 9/11, adding: "That evil is the same evil that inspired and rejoiced in the attack of 2001. And that evil must be defeated so we don't face it here again."
This language returns Bush to his most messianic, as when, after 9/11, he vowed to "rid the world of evil."
This is an impossible task, surely, and for Bush to assign it to himself is not only deluded, it's disastrous.
Especially in the context of Iraq.
For if the battle in Iraq is against "pure evil," the United States can never leave there until "pure evil" is vanquished.
But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
"See, we're going after killers," Bush said, and it doesn't matter whether they are Shiites or Sunnis. "Murderers are murderers," he said.
The civil war in Iraq is not some comic book, though. And rather than even acknowledge, as the Pentagon belatedly has done, that the situation there is indeed a civil war, Bush vaulted over that term in favor of the Big E.
By defining the situation in Iraq in such simplistic terms, Bush misconstrues the dynamics on the ground and consigns our troops to an endless quest.
Even he seemed to signal that it's going to go on for quite a while, as he stressed that the Baghdad escalation is just the "opening salvo in a sustained effort."
But it's unsustainable, and unwinnable.
And no more U.S. troops, no more Iraqi civilians, should be killed or wounded because of Bush's superhero fantasies.
(c) 2007 The Progressive
Bush just raised the stakes again in Iraq.
In his defiant speech Wednesday morning, he cast the battle in Iraq in the starkest terms yet. It's a battle, he said, against "pure evil."
Bush now says the war in Iraq is against "pure evil." But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
On cue, he then dragged on stage his favorite prop, 9/11, adding: "That evil is the same evil that inspired and rejoiced in the attack of 2001. And that evil must be defeated so we don't face it here again."
This language returns Bush to his most messianic, as when, after 9/11, he vowed to "rid the world of evil."
This is an impossible task, surely, and for Bush to assign it to himself is not only deluded, it's disastrous.
Especially in the context of Iraq.
For if the battle in Iraq is against "pure evil," the United States can never leave there until "pure evil" is vanquished.
But you don't vanquish evil, unless you're a superhero, which Bush imagines himself to be.
"See, we're going after killers," Bush said, and it doesn't matter whether they are Shiites or Sunnis. "Murderers are murderers," he said.
The civil war in Iraq is not some comic book, though. And rather than even acknowledge, as the Pentagon belatedly has done, that the situation there is indeed a civil war, Bush vaulted over that term in favor of the Big E.
By defining the situation in Iraq in such simplistic terms, Bush misconstrues the dynamics on the ground and consigns our troops to an endless quest.
Even he seemed to signal that it's going to go on for quite a while, as he stressed that the Baghdad escalation is just the "opening salvo in a sustained effort."
But it's unsustainable, and unwinnable.
And no more U.S. troops, no more Iraqi civilians, should be killed or wounded because of Bush's superhero fantasies.
(c) 2007 The Progressive