SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Decrying his conviction and prison sentence as "an outrageous miscarriage of justice," the wife of CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling was joined Wednesday by prominent activists and transparency advocates in calling for Sterling's immediate pardon and release.
"My husband Jeffrey Sterling is a former CIA operative and an innocent man who was convicted of seven counts of espionage on January 26, 2015--for merely communicating with New York Times journalist James Risen," Holly Sterling writes in a petition that she hand-delivered to the White House on Wednesday morning. "He's now serving a 3.5-year sentence in a federal correctional facility in Colorado."
Sterling is accused of handing classified material to Risen detailing the CIA's covert Operation Merlin, which was carried out under the administration of former President Bill Clinton to give the Iranian government false information about nuclear technology to delay its alleged nuclear weapons program. A federal court sentenced Sterling to prison after he was convicted of nine felony charges, including seven counts of espionage. He began serving his sentence eight months ago.
The petition, which has garnered more than 150,000 signatures since it launched in December, continues: "An innocent man who dedicated his life to serving the United States has been wrongfully jailed under President Obama's watch. This is his opportunity to show Jeffrey, our country, and the world what it means to be a true leader by acknowledging and making amends for a grave injustice that has been done. This can only be accomplished by granting Jeffrey Alexander Sterling an immediate pardon."
The Obama administration acknowledged receipt of Holly Sterling's petition, which she dropped off following a morning news conference organized by ExposeFacts, Reporters Without Borders, and RootsAction.org. Civil rights activist and scholar Cornel West, CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou, and renowned human rights attorney Jesselyn Radack spoke at the event. They accompanied Sterling to the White House gate.
Radack tweeted highlights from the press conference:
\u201c.@CornelWest: #Sterling is man of integrity, honesty, decency & virtue, and he is facing oppression, deception, insult & brute force.\u201d— unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted (@unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted) 1455721819
\u201c.@TimKarr: #Journalists need to advocate 4 themselves but also 4 sources & #whistleblowers. \n#calltoarms for journalists.\n#Sterling\u201d— unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted (@unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted) 1455720701
\u201cMy client .@JohnKiriakou supports fellow #CIA #whistleblower #Sterling: he did exactly what he was supposed to do & paid w/his freedom.\u201d— unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted (@unR\u0336A\u0336D\u0336A\u0336C\u0336K\u0336ted) 1455720227
A report published in November 2015 found that the U.S. government is not doing enough to protect national security whistleblowers, leaving those who expose corruption vulnerable to prosecution and allowing government abuses to run rampant.
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden should be credited with helping change U.S. surveillance law, Daniel Ellsberg, the man who leaked the Pentagon Papers, said Monday in an interview with The Guardian.
"It's interesting to see that the first time... this mass surveillance that's been going on is subjected to a genuine debate, it didn't stand up," he said.
Ellsberg was charged under the Espionage Act for disclosing secret U.S. military documents related to the Vietnam War in 1971. Snowden, who leaked a trove of classified NSA documents in 2013 and has been living in political asylum in Russia for the past three years, also faces prosecution under the Espionage Act.
Asked what should happen to Snowden, Ellsberg replied, "He should get the Nobel Peace Prize, and he should get asylum in a West European country."
Although "there is much more support for him month by month as people come to realize how little substance in the charges that he caused harm to us...that does not mean the intelligence community will ever forgive him for having exposed what they were doing," Ellsberg continued.
Ellsberg is currently on a week-long European speaking tour with several other renowned U.S. whistleblowers, including Thomas Drake, who helped expose fraud and abuse in the NSA's Trailblazer program; Coleen Rowley, who testified about the FBI's mishandling of information related to the September 11 attacks; and Jesselyn Radack, who disclosed ethics violations committed by the FBI and currently serves as the director of National Security & Human Rights at the Government Accountability Project.
Although the sunset of the Patriot Act on Sunday has forced the NSA to end its domestic phone records collection program, the agency will likely retain much of its surveillance power with the expected passage of the USA Freedom Act, a "compromise" bill that would renew modified versions of Section 215 and other provisions.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last month that the NSA's bulk phone records collection program "exceeds the scope of what Congress has authorized" under the Patriot Act. Referring to that decision, Ellsberg said Monday that "even the USA Freedom Act, which is better than the Patriot Act, still doesn't really reflect the full weight of the circuit court opinion that these provisions have been unconstitutional from their beginning and what the government has been doing is illegal."
Drake also spoke to The Guardian on Monday, stating, "This is the first time in almost 14 years that we stopped certain provisions... The national security mindset was unable to prevail."
The USA Freedom Act, meanwhile, "effectively codifies all the secret interpretations, a lot of the other authorities they claimed were enabled by the previous legislation, including the Patriot Act," Drake continued.
In a press briefing on Monday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said that despite the sunset of the Patriot Act, the Obama administration would not change its view that Snowden "committed very serious crimes."
But the importance of the Senate's rejection of the legislation cannot be discounted, said Ellsberg, and Snowden's influence on the changing political landscape in the U.S. deserves credit.
"This is the first time, thanks to Snowden, that the Senate really stood up and realized they have been complicit in the violation of our rights all along--unconstitutional action," Ellsberg said. "The Senate and the House have been passive up until now and derelict in their responsibilities. At last, there was opposition."
... is beginning here
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden's words were entered as testimony at the European Parliament's Civil Liberties Committee in Brussels on Monday.
Jesselyn Radack of the US Government Accountability Project (GAP) and a former whistleblower and ethics adviser to the US Department of Justice read Snowden's statement into the record.
Ms. Radack came to prominence after she revealed that the FBI had committed what she said was a breach of ethics in its interrogation of John Walker Lindh, who was captured during the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and dubbed the "American Taliban."
* * *
I thank the European Parliament and the LIBE Committee for taking up the challenge of mass surveillance. The surveillance of whole populations, rather than individuals, threatens to be the greatest human rights challenge of our time. The success of economies in developed nations relies increasingly on their creative output, and if that success is to continue, we must remember that creativity is the product of curiosity, which in turn is the product of privacy.
A culture of secrecy has denied our societies the opportunity to determine the appropriate balance between the human right of privacy and the governmental interest in investigation. These are not decisions that should be made for a people, but only by the people after full, informed, and fearless debate. Yet public debate is not possible without public knowledge, and in my country, the cost for one in my position of returning public knowledge to public hands has been persecution and exile. If we are to enjoy such debates in the future, we cannot rely upon individual sacrifice. We must create better channels for people of conscience to inform not only trusted agents of government, but independent representatives of the public outside of government.
When I began my work, it was with the sole intention of making possible the debate we see occurring here in this body and in many other bodies around the world. Today we see legislative bodies forming new committees, calling for investigations, and proposing new solutions for modern problems. We see emboldened courts that are no longer afraid to consider critical questions of national security. We see brave executives remembering that if a public is prevented from knowing how they are being governed, the necessary result is that they are no longer self-governing. And we see the public reclaiming an equal seat at the table of government. The work of a generation is beginning here, with your hearings, and you have the full measure of my gratitude and support.
GAP's Jesselyn Radack reads Edward Snowden's Statement for EU Parliament CommitteeGAP's Jesselyn Radack reads Edward Snowden's statement before the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, ...