For Immediate Release
California Legislature to Reconsider Renewable Electricity Standard
WASHINGTON - The California Legislature and Gov. Schwarzenegger are expected to
redouble their efforts to enact renewable energy legislation this year
that would require California utilities to acquire 33 percent of their
electricity from renewable energy like the wind and sun by 2020, up
from the state's current 20 percent requirement by the end of this year.
While the governor vetoed a package of renewable energy standard
bills last year, citing concerns that they would unduly restrict
out-of-state renewable energy from counting towards the requirement,
there is renewed interest among both branches of government to find
common ground on legislation sooner rather than later. The governor
issued an executive order on the 33 percent renewables issue, but the
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), state legislators, renewable
energy companies and many other stakeholders assert that an executive
order does not carry the force of law, which is what's needed to send a
clear market signal that California is prepared to invest in renewable
On March 4, State Sen. Joe Simitian reintroduced his legislation in
the form of SB 722. UCS and other supporters are working to address the
issues that provoked the governor's veto last year, while strengthening
enforcement provisions and ensuring the bill still includes the
cornerstones of an effective Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). The
administration has recently signaled its willingness to consider a new
RPS bill that addresses the concerns that led to last year's veto.
Below is a summary of the major policy issues that will shape
efforts to establish a 33 percent RPS by 2020, which would be one of
the most aggressive renewable energy standards in the country.
WHY A RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD IS NEEDED
- Market certainty: A 33 percent RPS established in
law is necessary to send a clear market signal that California is
serious about renewable energy investment.
- Cut global warming pollution: A 33 percent RPS is
a cornerstone policy of the state's efforts to reduce heat-trapping
pollution mandated in California's landmark Global Warming Solutions
Act (AB 32).
- Improve air quality: From 2005 to 2007, California's air pollution cost state residents more than $193 million in hospital-based medical care.
Shifting the state's reliance to renewable energy would reduce the
amount of air pollution from burning fossil fuels for electricity.
- Reduce exposure to volatile fuel prices: The state
currently relies upon natural gas to generate about half of its
electricity needs. Increasing the state's reliance on clean, local
sources of energy would diversify the energy supply and reduce
ratepayers' exposure to fossil fuel price volatility.
- Stimulate California's economy: A UCS analysis
found that boosting the nation's use of renewable energy sources, such
as wind and solar, would create more than three times as many jobs as
producing an equivalent amount of electricity from coal and other
fossil fuels. That's because a larger share of expenditures for
renewable energy go to manufacturing, installing and maintaining
equipment. The wind industry alone employs more than 85,000 workers
nationally, more than the coal mining industry.
A report issued by Next10 in June estimated that a 33 percent RPS also
could generate more than 500,000 new green jobs over the next several
CORNERSTONES OF AN EFFECTIVE 33 PERCENT RPS
UCS has played a lead role in building momentum for a 33 percent RPS
and is now working to ensure that the California Legislature passes a
bill that maximizes the benefits of a strong, enforceable standard.
According to UCS, an effective 33 percent RPS should include:
- A clear mandate and timeline: California's RPS
should set a firm floor, not a ceiling, for the amount of renewable
energy utilities are required to deliver to their customers by 2020.
This floor should be at least 33 percent by 2020, unwavering in its
deadline, and apply to all California utilities.
- Strong enforcement provisions: The 33 percent RPS
should include strong enforcement provisions to ensure the 2020 mandate
is not put off or inadequately planned. Compliance delays should be
rare and granted only if a utility has made all feasible attempts to
meet its interim obligations, including developing local projects at
the distribution level, which would not require the construction of new
transmission lines. The state should exercise its enforcement authority
if a utility has not taken all feasible actions to meet its renewable
- No loopholes or overly restrictive cost limitations:
California's RPS should not allow loopholes, "off ramps to nowhere," or
an unworkably low cost cap that would undermine the integrity of the
mandate. The most expensive thing California could do is to continue
its irresponsible addiction to volatile fossil fuels and other forms of
dirty, expensive, unsustainable energy.
- A strong definition of "renewable energy":
California's RPS should only include technologies that are truly
renewable and do not have the potential to cause significant
environmental damage. Moreover, the state also should ensure that it
holds renewable energy developed outside the state to the same
environmental standards as those projects within California's borders.
LAST YEAR'S STICKING POINTS AND HOW TO FIX THEM
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The media landscape is changing fast
Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.
Change is coming. And we've got it covered.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
Please donate to our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign today.
The underlying goal of California's RPS policies is to drive the
development of new renewable energy facilities and displace the need to
generate in-state electricity from fossil fuels. Doing so would provide
a host of benefits to California's environment and economy – and help
solve climate change. The biggest sticking point last year was how to
determine the appropriate balance of in-state renewable energy,
out-of-state renewable energy imports, and renewable energy credit-only
(REC-only) transactions. Below are the main sticking points that
contributed toward last year's veto, as well as the UCS policy solution:
- In-state renewable energy generation: When a
renewable energy facility is built inside the state and generates
electricity inside the state, we have the highest level of certainty
that electricity produced will displace generation from in-state fossil
fuel facilities. This means air pollution and global warming pollution
inside California is reduced. An in-state facility also will generate
jobs for Californians.
- Out-of-state renewable energy generation: If an
out-of-state facility is not directly connected to a California grid,
it is impossible to ensure that actual "green" electrons from the
facility make it into California. Out-of-state facilities do not create
local jobs and may reduce the pressure to upgrade California's
electricity infrastructure, including transmission lines, to
accommodate larger amounts of renewable energy in California. However,
California imports a significant amount of its conventional electricity
from outside the state, and the California power grids are part of a
larger western grid, so it does not make sense to completely restrict
out-of-state renewable energy from contributing toward California's
renewable energy goals. Plus, an explicit restriction on the amount of
power that could count from outside the state likely would be a
violation of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Out-of-state renewable
energy transactions should be allowed to count toward a portion of the
California RPS requirement. Out-of-state transactions that qualify as
"bundled" products must be able to prove that the electricity import
associated with the transaction is entering California only because of
the RPS contract. (For more on RECs see below.) This incremental
electricity import will reduce the need to generate electricity from
fossil fuels inside the state, thereby reducing in-state pollution. If
the transaction cannot be linked to a new electricity import, then it
should be considered "REC-only."
- Renewable energy credits (RECs): Renewable energy
credits are the "green attribute" of renewable energy generation. 1 REC
equals 1 megawatt hour (MWh) of renewable energy generated. RECs can
either be sold with their underlying energy as a "bundled" product, or
they can be sold as a separate commodity as a "REC-only" or "unbundled
REC" or "tradable REC." If the REC and its underlying energy are
separated, the energy can no longer be considered "green" or renewable.
Allowing utilities to simply buy a REC and not worry about also
bringing out-of-state energy into California offers flexibility and
potential cost savings, but it does not provide the same amount of
benefits that a "bundled" product provides. This is because REC-only
transactions do not include energy, which means that there is no energy
import to displace in-state fossil fuel generation. Even though a REC
displaces global warming emissions somewhere on the western grid,
California is not receiving important, additional local benefits.
Furthermore, a REC by itself does not help California diversify its
resource portfolio or reduce our exposure to volatile natural gas
How to fix it: UCS is working with environmentalists, labor groups,
legislators, the administration and other stakeholders to propose a
solution that would allow certain out-of-state energy transactions that
deliver energy to California at a different time from when the
renewable energy is actually generated to be considered bundled so long
- Drive new, western renewable energy development that would serve California RPS requirements in the long-run; and
- Deliver an incremental energy import, which in turn reduces the need for fossil fuel electricity generation inside the state.
CALIFORNIA NEEDS MORE RENEWABLE ENERGY NOW
Global warming is under way, mainly due to burning fossil fuels for
energy. The latest peer-reviewed climate science suggests that warming
is happening even faster than what the world's best climate models
projected in 2007. To avoid the worst consequences of climate change,
the nation must rely on cleaner forms of energy to power the economy.
The RPS is a proven way to do that affordably, and now is the time for
California – the world's eighth largest economy – to lead the way by
increasing its RPS.
 J. Romley, A. Hackbarth, D. Goldman, The Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending, RAND Corporation, 2010.
Union of Concerned Scientists, Clean Energy, Green Jobs, 2009,
 Roland-Holst, Energy Pathways for the California Economy, Next 10, June 2009
We want a more open and sharing world.
That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.
All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.
Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.
Please select a donation method:
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.