June, 21 2010, 04:22pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Elliott Negin,Media Director,enegin@ucsusa.org
California Legislature to Reconsider Renewable Electricity Standard
WASHINGTON
The California Legislature and Gov. Schwarzenegger are expected to
redouble their efforts to enact renewable energy legislation this year
that would require California utilities to acquire 33 percent of their
electricity from renewable energy like the wind and sun by 2020, up
from the state's current 20 percent requirement by the end of this year.
While the governor vetoed a package of renewable energy standard
bills last year, citing concerns that they would unduly restrict
out-of-state renewable energy from counting towards the requirement,
there is renewed interest among both branches of government to find
common ground on legislation sooner rather than later. The governor
issued an executive order on the 33 percent renewables issue, but the
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), state legislators, renewable
energy companies and many other stakeholders assert that an executive
order does not carry the force of law, which is what's needed to send a
clear market signal that California is prepared to invest in renewable
energy.
On March 4, State Sen. Joe Simitian reintroduced his legislation in
the form of SB 722. UCS and other supporters are working to address the
issues that provoked the governor's veto last year, while strengthening
enforcement provisions and ensuring the bill still includes the
cornerstones of an effective Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). The
administration has recently signaled its willingness to consider a new
RPS bill that addresses the concerns that led to last year's veto.
Below is a summary of the major policy issues that will shape
efforts to establish a 33 percent RPS by 2020, which would be one of
the most aggressive renewable energy standards in the country.
WHY A RENEWABLES PORTFOLIO STANDARD IS NEEDED
- Market certainty: A 33 percent RPS established in
law is necessary to send a clear market signal that California is
serious about renewable energy investment. - Cut global warming pollution: A 33 percent RPS is
a cornerstone policy of the state's efforts to reduce heat-trapping
pollution mandated in California's landmark Global Warming Solutions
Act (AB 32). - Improve air quality: From 2005 to 2007, California's air pollution cost state residents more than $193 million in hospital-based medical care.[1]
Shifting the state's reliance to renewable energy would reduce the
amount of air pollution from burning fossil fuels for electricity. - Reduce exposure to volatile fuel prices: The state
currently relies upon natural gas to generate about half of its
electricity needs. Increasing the state's reliance on clean, local
sources of energy would diversify the energy supply and reduce
ratepayers' exposure to fossil fuel price volatility. - Stimulate California's economy: A UCS analysis
found that boosting the nation's use of renewable energy sources, such
as wind and solar, would create more than three times as many jobs as
producing an equivalent amount of electricity from coal and other
fossil fuels. That's because a larger share of expenditures for
renewable energy go to manufacturing, installing and maintaining
equipment. The wind industry alone employs more than 85,000 workers
nationally, more than the coal mining industry.[2]
A report issued by Next10 in June estimated that a 33 percent RPS also
could generate more than 500,000 new green jobs over the next several
decades.[3]
CORNERSTONES OF AN EFFECTIVE 33 PERCENT RPS
UCS has played a lead role in building momentum for a 33 percent RPS
and is now working to ensure that the California Legislature passes a
bill that maximizes the benefits of a strong, enforceable standard.
According to UCS, an effective 33 percent RPS should include:
- A clear mandate and timeline: California's RPS
should set a firm floor, not a ceiling, for the amount of renewable
energy utilities are required to deliver to their customers by 2020.
This floor should be at least 33 percent by 2020, unwavering in its
deadline, and apply to all California utilities. - Strong enforcement provisions: The 33 percent RPS
should include strong enforcement provisions to ensure the 2020 mandate
is not put off or inadequately planned. Compliance delays should be
rare and granted only if a utility has made all feasible attempts to
meet its interim obligations, including developing local projects at
the distribution level, which would not require the construction of new
transmission lines. The state should exercise its enforcement authority
if a utility has not taken all feasible actions to meet its renewable
energy obligation. - No loopholes or overly restrictive cost limitations:
California's RPS should not allow loopholes, "off ramps to nowhere," or
an unworkably low cost cap that would undermine the integrity of the
mandate. The most expensive thing California could do is to continue
its irresponsible addiction to volatile fossil fuels and other forms of
dirty, expensive, unsustainable energy. - A strong definition of "renewable energy":
California's RPS should only include technologies that are truly
renewable and do not have the potential to cause significant
environmental damage. Moreover, the state also should ensure that it
holds renewable energy developed outside the state to the same
environmental standards as those projects within California's borders.
LAST YEAR'S STICKING POINTS AND HOW TO FIX THEM
The underlying goal of California's RPS policies is to drive the
development of new renewable energy facilities and displace the need to
generate in-state electricity from fossil fuels. Doing so would provide
a host of benefits to California's environment and economy - and help
solve climate change. The biggest sticking point last year was how to
determine the appropriate balance of in-state renewable energy,
out-of-state renewable energy imports, and renewable energy credit-only
(REC-only) transactions. Below are the main sticking points that
contributed toward last year's veto, as well as the UCS policy solution:
- In-state renewable energy generation: When a
renewable energy facility is built inside the state and generates
electricity inside the state, we have the highest level of certainty
that electricity produced will displace generation from in-state fossil
fuel facilities. This means air pollution and global warming pollution
inside California is reduced. An in-state facility also will generate
jobs for Californians. - Out-of-state renewable energy generation: If an
out-of-state facility is not directly connected to a California grid,
it is impossible to ensure that actual "green" electrons from the
facility make it into California. Out-of-state facilities do not create
local jobs and may reduce the pressure to upgrade California's
electricity infrastructure, including transmission lines, to
accommodate larger amounts of renewable energy in California. However,
California imports a significant amount of its conventional electricity
from outside the state, and the California power grids are part of a
larger western grid, so it does not make sense to completely restrict
out-of-state renewable energy from contributing toward California's
renewable energy goals. Plus, an explicit restriction on the amount of
power that could count from outside the state likely would be a
violation of the Interstate Commerce Clause. Out-of-state renewable
energy transactions should be allowed to count toward a portion of the
California RPS requirement. Out-of-state transactions that qualify as
"bundled" products must be able to prove that the electricity import
associated with the transaction is entering California only because of
the RPS contract. (For more on RECs see below.) This incremental
electricity import will reduce the need to generate electricity from
fossil fuels inside the state, thereby reducing in-state pollution. If
the transaction cannot be linked to a new electricity import, then it
should be considered "REC-only." - Renewable energy credits (RECs): Renewable energy
credits are the "green attribute" of renewable energy generation. 1 REC
equals 1 megawatt hour (MWh) of renewable energy generated. RECs can
either be sold with their underlying energy as a "bundled" product, or
they can be sold as a separate commodity as a "REC-only" or "unbundled
REC" or "tradable REC." If the REC and its underlying energy are
separated, the energy can no longer be considered "green" or renewable.
Allowing utilities to simply buy a REC and not worry about also
bringing out-of-state energy into California offers flexibility and
potential cost savings, but it does not provide the same amount of
benefits that a "bundled" product provides. This is because REC-only
transactions do not include energy, which means that there is no energy
import to displace in-state fossil fuel generation. Even though a REC
displaces global warming emissions somewhere on the western grid,
California is not receiving important, additional local benefits.
Furthermore, a REC by itself does not help California diversify its
resource portfolio or reduce our exposure to volatile natural gas
prices.
How to fix it: UCS is working with environmentalists, labor groups,
legislators, the administration and other stakeholders to propose a
solution that would allow certain out-of-state energy transactions that
deliver energy to California at a different time from when the
renewable energy is actually generated to be considered bundled so long
as they:
- Drive new, western renewable energy development that would serve California RPS requirements in the long-run; and
- Deliver an incremental energy import, which in turn reduces the need for fossil fuel electricity generation inside the state.
CALIFORNIA NEEDS MORE RENEWABLE ENERGY NOW
Global warming is under way, mainly due to burning fossil fuels for
energy. The latest peer-reviewed climate science suggests that warming
is happening even faster than what the world's best climate models
projected in 2007. To avoid the worst consequences of climate change,
the nation must rely on cleaner forms of energy to power the economy.
The RPS is a proven way to do that affordably, and now is the time for
California - the world's eighth largest economy - to lead the way by
increasing its RPS.
[1] J. Romley, A. Hackbarth, D. Goldman, The Impact of Air Quality on Hospital Spending, RAND Corporation, 2010.
[2]
Union of Concerned Scientists, Clean Energy, Green Jobs, 2009,
available at:
https://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/clean_energy/Clean-Power-Green-...
[3] Roland-Holst, Energy Pathways for the California Economy, Next 10, June 2009
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
UNICEF Warns Area Israel Pushing Rafah Residents to Is 'Not Safe'
"It is a narrow strip of beach on the coast that lacks the basic infrastructure—like toilets and running water—needed to sustain the population," said the agency chief.
May 09, 2024
As Israel's tanks and warplanes continued attacking eastern Rafah on Thursday amid fears of a full-scale invasion, United Nations leaders warned that the area to which Israeli forces are directing Palestinians in the southern Gaza Strip city is unsafe.
The Israel Defense Forces this week has
circulated a map and claimed that "the IDF has expanded the humanitarian area in Al-Mawasi to accommodate the increased levels of aid flowing into Gaza. This expanded humanitarian area includes field hospitals, tents, and increased amounts of food, water, medication, and additional supplies."
However, in an interview published Wednesday, Tess Ingram of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
said that "the area that they're being directed to evacuate to is not safe. It's not safe because there aren't the services there to meet their basic needs, water, toilets, shelter."
"But it's also not safe because we know that that area has been subject to strikes despite being a so-called safe zone. So we're really concerned about that impact of a ground offensive on one of the most densely populated areas in the world," she told The Intercept's Jeremy Scahill.
"Israel's latest evacuation orders and their ground operations will bring more death and displacement."
Rafah was home to about a quarter-million people before October 7, but since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has
called a "plausibly" genocidal assault on Gaza—killing at least 34,904 Palestinians and wounding another 78,514 as of Thursday—the city's population has swelled to over 1.4 million.
UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell
said last week that a major military operation against the crowded city "would bring catastrophe on top of catastrophe" for the young people there, explaining that "nearly all of the some 600,000 children now crammed into Rafah are either injured, sick, malnourished, traumatized, or living with disabilities."
Noting that "many of them have been displaced multiple times already," Ingram, who recently returned from Gaza, similarly told Scahill that "they're exhausted, traumatized, sick, hungry, and their ability to safely evacuate is limited."
Despite warnings from humanitarian leaders and the U.S. government—which has continued to arm the IDF throughout the war—Israeli forces attacked Rafah this week and seized control of the border crossing with Egypt, further restricting aid delivery.
U.S. President Joe Biden previously called attacking Rafah a "red line." While criticizing the IDF assault on the city Wednesday, the American leader was accused of "moving the goal post" because he merely threatened to cut off arms if Israel pursued a major invasion, rather than stopping the flow of arms immediately.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear on Thursday that he has no intention of backing down, saying in a video message in Hebrew that "if we are forced to stand alone, we will stand alone."
Russell said in a statement Thursday that "the intensification of military operations in the Rafah area and the closure of key border crossings into southern Gaza have severed our access to fuel, threatening to grind humanitarian operations to a halt."
According to the UNICEF chief:
If the Kerem Shalom and Rafah crossings are not reopened to fuel and humanitarian supplies, the consequences will be felt almost immediately: Life support services for premature babies will lose power; children and families will become dehydrated or consume dangerous water; sewage will overflow and spread disease further. Simply put, lost time will soon become lost lives.
I strongly urge the relevant authorities to provide humanitarian actors with actionable measures and concrete assurances to facilitate safe and secure movement of humanitarian cargo, via all routes, into and within the Gaza Strip.
"I am also deeply concerned about the movement of civilians in Gaza to unsafe areas," Russell continued. "In response to evacuation orders in eastern Rafah, at least 80,000 people have reportedly fled the area, with many seeking shelter in Al-Mawasi and among the ruins of Khan Younis. We have been warning for months that Al-Mawasi is not a safe option. It is a narrow strip of beach on the coast that lacks the basic infrastructure—like toilets and running water—needed to sustain the population."
Plus, as Scott Anderson, deputy director of the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, toldPolitico on Wednesday, "there's already 450,000 people in that general area. It is crowded."
Anderson also warned about dwindling supplies, saying that "we're down to no fuel. We're basically out. We've kept enough to meet the minimum security standards we have to meet for the U.N. so we can continue to stay here. But we're down to that level. Some hospitals will start shutting down their generators in three days if we don't get fuel in."
Martin Griffiths, the U.N. under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator, stressed in a Thursday statement that "civilians must be protected and have their basic needs met, whether they move or stay."
While warning that "Israel's latest evacuation orders and their ground operations will bring more death and displacement," Griffiths also said that "we remain committed to providing aid to people, regardless of where they are."
"The decisions that are made today and their consequences in human suffering will be remembered by the generation that follows us," he concluded. "Let us be ready for their reproaches."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Protest Works': Trinity College Dublin Agrees to Divest From Israeli Firms
Trinity's incoming student union president stressed that the school "refused to follow the U.S. example of bringing police in and made it clear that it would not pursue anything like that here."
May 09, 2024
Students at Trinity College Dublin in Ireland protesting the school's complicity in Israeli crimes in Palestine began dismantling their encampment Wednesday after administrators agreed to divest from three companies with ties to Israel's illegal settler colonies in the occupied West Bank.
TCD—which earlier this week
decried the "disproportionate response" to some pro-Palestine campus protests abroad—said an agreement between protesters and administrators had been reached on Wednesday afternoon, and that "plans are being put in place to return to normal university business for staff, students, and members of the public."
"We are glad that this agreement has been reached and are committed to further constructive engagement on the issues raised," senior dean Eoin O'Sullivan said. "We thank the students for their engagement."
Outgoing Trinity College Dublin Students' Union (TCDSU) president László Molnárfi called the agreement a "testament to grassroots student-staff power."
Incoming TCDSU president Jenny Maguire contrasted the situation at her school to the violent repression of student-led protests on some U.S. campuses.
"The college was determined that it would be an example going forward," Maguire said, according toThe New York Times. "It refused to follow the U.S. example of bringing police in and made it clear that it would not pursue anything like that here."
TCD's statement affirmed:
We fully understand the driving force behind the encampment on our campus and we are in solidarity with the students in our horror at what is happening in Gaza. We abhor and condemn all violence and war, including the atrocities of October 7th, the taking of hostages, and the continuing ferocious and disproportionate onslaught in Gaza. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the dehumanization of its people are obscene. We support the International Court of Justice's position that "Israel must take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide in relation to members of the Palestinian group in the Gaza Strip."
"Trinity will endeavor to divest from investments in other Israeli companies," the school added, vowing to establish a task force on the issue.
"A real and lasting solution that respects the human rights of everyone needs to be found," the TCD statement said.
The protest camp—which was spearheaded by TCDSU and the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement—was erected Friday night on Fellow's Square, at the heart of Ireland's oldest university. Students demanded that TCD sell off its investments in three Israeli companies included on a United Nations "blacklist" first published in 2020 for their links to human rights violations committed by Israel in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The TCD protest came amid Israel's 216-day assault on Gaza, which has left at least 124,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing in what the International Court of Justice in January called a "plausibly" genocidal campaign. Support for Palestine runs strong and deep in Ireland, which, like Palestine, was also colonized by the British, and where many people see parallels between their historic repression and Israel's crimes against Palestinians.
TCD's campus—which is located in the center of the Irish capital—had been shut down for five days, a move that affected the school's income as it houses the Book of Kells, an ancient Celtic manuscript visitors pay from €16-€33.50 ($17-$36) to see. According toThe Irish Times, the Book of Kells generates approximately €350,000 ($377,000) in weekly income during the busy summer months.
Last week, the TCD fined TCDSU €214,000 ($231,000) for financial losses stemming from multiple protests held throughout this academic year.
Meanwhile in the United States—where a pair of Republican senators this week introduced legislation to brand students protesting for Palestine as "terrorists" and add them to the no-fly list—campus encampments continued to spread from coast to coast.
On Wednesday, progressive U.S. Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.) spoke alongside student protesters from George Washington University outside the U.S. Capitol.
https://t.co/MvLg0MMN90
— Congresswoman Cori Bush (@RepCori) May 8, 2024
"We will not stop in defending these students until [the] end in regards to the genocide... until there is an immediate and permanent cease-fire that includes complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza," said Tlaib, the only Palestinian American member of Congress. "We're proud to use our positions in office to bring these voices, so you all don't forget why there are encampments, why there are movements and dissent around this country."
While crackdowns and violence by police and Israel supporters have garnered most of the headlines in the U.S., at least eight schools across the country including California State University, Sacramento; Evergreen State College; University of California, Riverside; Brown University; Rutgers University; State University of New York, Purchase; Northwestern University; and University of Minnesota have agreed to some or all of students' demands.
After a week of demonstrations at a student-led encampment at California State University, Sacramento, administrators said they would revise the school's socially responsible investment policy and refrain from investments linked to Israeli human rights violations in Palestine.
"I think it's so significant what we did here because we're essentially raising the bar for all universities," Sacramento State sophomore Michael Lee-Chang toldThe Intercept. "We've had every single one of our demands met, and that's how it should be. We're here for Palestine, and student power shouldn't be underestimated. I can't state just how excited I am and can't wait to see how our win helps other campuses reach their victories too."
Faculty at U.S. colleges and universities have also been taking a more active role in the protests. Professors and other staff at the New School in New York City set up a solidarity camp on Wednesday, erecting tents with signs including "Faculty Against Genocide" and "Jews for Palestine."
As of Thursday, more than 800 Jewish professors had signed an open letter demanding that lawmakers and U.S. President Joe Biden oppose the so-called Antisemitism Awareness Act, House-approved legislation the educators warn will "amplify the real threats Jewish Americans already face" by "conflating antisemitism with legitimate criticism of Israel."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Inexcusable': Amnesty Slams Biden Admin for Delaying Report on Israel's Use of US Weapons
"The Biden administration had months to put together a report on information they should already be collecting."
May 09, 2024
A leading human rights organization on Wednesday slammed the Biden administration's decision to indefinitely delay the release of a report on whether Israel and other U.S. allies are using American weaponry in compliance with international law.
"The Biden administration had months to put together a report on information they should already be collecting—whether grave human rights violations and other serious violations of international law are being committed using U.S.-provided weapons in seven conflicts around the world," said Amanda Klasing, national director for government relations at Amnesty International USA. "They must release it urgently."
"This is especially urgent," Klasing added, "given the Israeli military's ground operation in Rafah, in the occupied Gaza Strip, where more than 1.4 million Palestinians, including 600,000 children, are sheltering. Burying the head in the sand tactic doesn't make the violations of the government of Israel go away."
Required under a White House policy implemented in February, the report was supposed to be delivered to Congress on May 8.
U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said during a press briefing Wednesday that the administration will "have it up in the coming days," but declined to offer a specific timeline.
"It is overdue for President Biden to end U.S. complicity with the government of Israel's grave violations of international law."
U.S. President Joe Biden admitted in a CNN interview Wednesday that the Israeli military has killed civilians in Gaza with American-made bombs—something human rights organizations like Amnesty have been documenting for months.
In a research brief submitted to the Biden administration last week, Amnesty detailed three cases in which Israel's military has used U.S.-made weapons in violation of international law. In October, Israeli forces used Joint Direct Attack Munitions manufactured by Boeing to carry out airstrikes on two Gaza homes, killing 43 civilians—including 19 children and 14 women.
While applauding Biden's decision to halt a shipment of thousands of bombs to Israel as it attacks Rafah, Amnesty said Wednesday that it was "inexcusable" for the State Department to postpone the long-awaited report.
"It is overdue for President Biden to end U.S. complicity with the government of Israel's grave violations of international law," said Klasing. "Tough conversations with counterparts in Israel are tragically and clearly not doing the job—violations continue unabated, and civilians are paying the price with their lives."
It's unclear why the administration was unable to meet its own deadline for providing U.S. lawmakers with the report on Israel's use of American weaponry.
Kevin Martin, the president of Peace Action, argued in an op-ed for Common Dreams on Thursday that the delay "reflects internal divisions within the State Department not just about Israel's fallacious claim of compliance, but what to recommend to the executive branch in terms of possible action against Israel."
An internal State Department memo that leaked last month showed that officials at four of the department's bureaus did not believe the Israeli government's written assurances that its use of American weaponry in Gaza has followed international law.
Several State Department officials have resigned since October over the Biden administration's decision to arm Israel's assault on Gaza, which has killed more than 34,900 people and sparked an appalling humanitarian crisis.
Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now, said Thursday that the Biden administration's "suspension of massive bombs to Israel is an important but long-overdue acknowledgment that Israel has been using American weapons to indiscriminately kill Palestinian civilians in violation of the most basic laws of war."
"Suspending all weapons transfers to Israel shouldn't be a political tactic," said Whitson, "but rather adhering to long-standing laws that prohibit arming abusers."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular