

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Advocates hold a vigil outside of Eli Lilly offices in New York City on September 5, 2019.
"Seniors and families already struggling to afford lifesaving medicines are told to brace for further price hikes by the same industry that saw its profits and shareholder rewards skyrocket by billions in a year."
An analysis published Tuesday shows that the five largest pharmaceutical companies in the United States raked in combined earnings of $82 billion last year and rewarded investors with billions of dollars in dividends and stock buybacks—all while hiking prices for prescription drugs and fighting federal efforts to curb costs.
The new analysis by the progressive watchdog group Accountable.US finds that Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, AbbVie, and Pfizer increased their combined share repurchases and dividends by $4.4 billion and $2.5 billion respectively in 2022 as their profits grew by nearly $9 billion compared to 2021.
Last year, pharmaceutical companies raised the prices of more than 1,100 medicines, according to a tally by Patients for Affordable Drugs.
At the start of 2023, drugmakers hiked the prices of at least 350 medicines. While Eli Lilly and other insulin makers announced plans to cut the prices of their most commonly used insulin products earlier this year, they have benefited from decades of harmful price gouging.
"Seniors and families already struggling to afford lifesaving medicines are told to brace for further price hikes by the same industry that saw its profits and shareholder rewards skyrocket by billions in a year," Liz Zelnick, director of Accountable.US' Economic Security and Corporate Power program, said in a statement Tuesday. "It only adds up to corporate greed."
"Pharma executives' claims that research and development expenses drive costs remain unconvincing," Zelnick added, "when those costs are often eclipsed by billions of dollars in handouts to a small group of wealthy investors."
The analysis comes as the pharmaceutical industry is suing the Biden administration over a 2022 law that gives Medicare the authority to negotiate the prices of a small number of high-cost medications directly with drugmakers.
Merck—which, according to Accountable.US, saw its profits rise to over $14.5 billion last year—launched the industry's widely expected legal attack on the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions last month with a suit against the Health and Human Services Department.
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) joined the fight two weeks later. Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have also sued the Biden administration over the drug price negotiation provisions.
"The suits make similar and overlapping claims that the drug pricing provisions are unconstitutional," The New York Times reported Monday. "They are scattered in federal courts around the country—a tactic that experts say gives the industry a better chance of obtaining conflicting rulings that will put the legal challenges on a fast track to a business-friendly Supreme Court."
Zelnick argued Tuesday that drug companies' aggressive campaign against the drug price negotiations with Medicare "is all about preserving their industry's corporate profiteering strategy, which has clearly been immune to repeated interest rate hikes from the Fed."
Accountable.US' analysis notes that "in the years leading up to the passage of the IRA," PhRMA spent "nearly $70 million lobbying against efforts to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of prescription drugs and other measures to lower drug prices."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
An analysis published Tuesday shows that the five largest pharmaceutical companies in the United States raked in combined earnings of $82 billion last year and rewarded investors with billions of dollars in dividends and stock buybacks—all while hiking prices for prescription drugs and fighting federal efforts to curb costs.
The new analysis by the progressive watchdog group Accountable.US finds that Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, AbbVie, and Pfizer increased their combined share repurchases and dividends by $4.4 billion and $2.5 billion respectively in 2022 as their profits grew by nearly $9 billion compared to 2021.
Last year, pharmaceutical companies raised the prices of more than 1,100 medicines, according to a tally by Patients for Affordable Drugs.
At the start of 2023, drugmakers hiked the prices of at least 350 medicines. While Eli Lilly and other insulin makers announced plans to cut the prices of their most commonly used insulin products earlier this year, they have benefited from decades of harmful price gouging.
"Seniors and families already struggling to afford lifesaving medicines are told to brace for further price hikes by the same industry that saw its profits and shareholder rewards skyrocket by billions in a year," Liz Zelnick, director of Accountable.US' Economic Security and Corporate Power program, said in a statement Tuesday. "It only adds up to corporate greed."
"Pharma executives' claims that research and development expenses drive costs remain unconvincing," Zelnick added, "when those costs are often eclipsed by billions of dollars in handouts to a small group of wealthy investors."
The analysis comes as the pharmaceutical industry is suing the Biden administration over a 2022 law that gives Medicare the authority to negotiate the prices of a small number of high-cost medications directly with drugmakers.
Merck—which, according to Accountable.US, saw its profits rise to over $14.5 billion last year—launched the industry's widely expected legal attack on the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions last month with a suit against the Health and Human Services Department.
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) joined the fight two weeks later. Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have also sued the Biden administration over the drug price negotiation provisions.
"The suits make similar and overlapping claims that the drug pricing provisions are unconstitutional," The New York Times reported Monday. "They are scattered in federal courts around the country—a tactic that experts say gives the industry a better chance of obtaining conflicting rulings that will put the legal challenges on a fast track to a business-friendly Supreme Court."
Zelnick argued Tuesday that drug companies' aggressive campaign against the drug price negotiations with Medicare "is all about preserving their industry's corporate profiteering strategy, which has clearly been immune to repeated interest rate hikes from the Fed."
Accountable.US' analysis notes that "in the years leading up to the passage of the IRA," PhRMA spent "nearly $70 million lobbying against efforts to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of prescription drugs and other measures to lower drug prices."
An analysis published Tuesday shows that the five largest pharmaceutical companies in the United States raked in combined earnings of $82 billion last year and rewarded investors with billions of dollars in dividends and stock buybacks—all while hiking prices for prescription drugs and fighting federal efforts to curb costs.
The new analysis by the progressive watchdog group Accountable.US finds that Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, AbbVie, and Pfizer increased their combined share repurchases and dividends by $4.4 billion and $2.5 billion respectively in 2022 as their profits grew by nearly $9 billion compared to 2021.
Last year, pharmaceutical companies raised the prices of more than 1,100 medicines, according to a tally by Patients for Affordable Drugs.
At the start of 2023, drugmakers hiked the prices of at least 350 medicines. While Eli Lilly and other insulin makers announced plans to cut the prices of their most commonly used insulin products earlier this year, they have benefited from decades of harmful price gouging.
"Seniors and families already struggling to afford lifesaving medicines are told to brace for further price hikes by the same industry that saw its profits and shareholder rewards skyrocket by billions in a year," Liz Zelnick, director of Accountable.US' Economic Security and Corporate Power program, said in a statement Tuesday. "It only adds up to corporate greed."
"Pharma executives' claims that research and development expenses drive costs remain unconvincing," Zelnick added, "when those costs are often eclipsed by billions of dollars in handouts to a small group of wealthy investors."
The analysis comes as the pharmaceutical industry is suing the Biden administration over a 2022 law that gives Medicare the authority to negotiate the prices of a small number of high-cost medications directly with drugmakers.
Merck—which, according to Accountable.US, saw its profits rise to over $14.5 billion last year—launched the industry's widely expected legal attack on the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions last month with a suit against the Health and Human Services Department.
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) joined the fight two weeks later. Bristol Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Johnson & Johnson, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have also sued the Biden administration over the drug price negotiation provisions.
"The suits make similar and overlapping claims that the drug pricing provisions are unconstitutional," The New York Times reported Monday. "They are scattered in federal courts around the country—a tactic that experts say gives the industry a better chance of obtaining conflicting rulings that will put the legal challenges on a fast track to a business-friendly Supreme Court."
Zelnick argued Tuesday that drug companies' aggressive campaign against the drug price negotiations with Medicare "is all about preserving their industry's corporate profiteering strategy, which has clearly been immune to repeated interest rate hikes from the Fed."
Accountable.US' analysis notes that "in the years leading up to the passage of the IRA," PhRMA spent "nearly $70 million lobbying against efforts to allow Medicare to negotiate the prices of prescription drugs and other measures to lower drug prices."