Activists take part in a candlelit vigil to denounce the killing of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh on May 12, 2022 in Beirut, Lebanon. (Photo: Marwan Naamani/picture alliance via Getty Images)
Revealing New Evidence in Abu Akleh's Killing, Al Jazeera Sues Israeli Forces at ICC
The news network said the journalist's killing was part of a "wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine."
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.