Dec 06, 2022
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
\u201cAl Jazeera Media Network will today submit the case of Shireen Abu Akleh\u2019s killing by Israeli Occupation Forces to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. https://t.co/2cxoLbnZYl\u201d— Al Jazeera PR (@Al Jazeera PR) 1670312533
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
\u201cAl Jazeera Media Network will today submit the case of Shireen Abu Akleh\u2019s killing by Israeli Occupation Forces to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. https://t.co/2cxoLbnZYl\u201d— Al Jazeera PR (@Al Jazeera PR) 1670312533
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.
Following an investigation that Al Jazeera said uncovered new evidence regarding the fatal shooting of Palestinian-America journalist Shireen Abu Akleh in May, the international news network said Tuesday that it has filed a lawsuit against Israeli military forces at the International Criminal Court.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded."
"Al Jazeera's legal team has conducted a full and detailed investigation into the case and unearthed new evidence based on several eyewitness accounts, the examination of multiple items of video footage, and forensic evidence pertaining to the case," said the network in a statement.
The investigation reportedly showed that Abu Akleh and her colleagues "were directly fired at by the Israeli occupation forces" when they were covering a raid by the forces in Jenin in the occupied West Bank on May 11.
"The claim by the Israeli authorities that Shireen was killed by mistake in an exchange of fire is completely unfounded," said Al Jazeera.
\u201cAl Jazeera Media Network will today submit the case of Shireen Abu Akleh\u2019s killing by Israeli Occupation Forces to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. https://t.co/2cxoLbnZYl\u201d— Al Jazeera PR (@Al Jazeera PR) 1670312533
Rodney Dixon, a lawyer for the network, told reporters that the ICC should identify the individuals responsible for Abu Akleh's killing.
"The rulings of the International Criminal Court stipulate that those responsible be investigated and held accountable," said Dixon. "Otherwise, they bear the same responsibility as if they were the ones who opened fire."
The legal filing comes weeks after Israeli officials said they would not cooperate with an FBI investigation into the death of Abu Akleh, who was wearing a vest and helmet identifying her as a member of the press when she was shot in the head.
Israel has said it conducted an investigation which found the origin of the bullet that killed the veteran Al Jazeera journalist could not be determined because it was too damaged, suggesting that Palestinian forces could have fired the bullet.
Other investigations--including a U.S.-led forensic and ballistic probe and one by the Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights--found that Israeli forces may have unintentionally fired the weapon that killed Abu Akleh, while an independent investigation by Forensic Architecture in the U.K. and the Palestinian human rights group Al-Haq concluded that Israel Defense Forces had intentionally killed the journalist.
Dixon said the ICC should consider the lawsuit "in the context of a wider attack on Al Jazeera, and journalists in Palestine," referring to the bombing of a building that housed Associated Press and Al Jazeera offices in May 2021.
"It's not a single incident, it's a killing that is part of a wider pattern that the prosecution should be investigating to identify those who are responsible for the killing, and to bring charges against them," said Dixon.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.