

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts pause for photographs at the top of the steps of the west side of the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on October 1, 2021. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Just two days after U.S. President Joe Biden announced the formal launch of the application for his student debt relief plan, a right-wing group focused on tax policy in Wisconsin asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to temporarily block the program.
Unveiled in August, Biden's plan is set to forgive up to $20,000 for federal borrowers who meet specific income requirements. While progressives have long pushed for even bolder debt cancellation, right-wing politicians and groups have taken aim at the administration's more modest policy.
There are multiple ongoing legal challenges against the program, but the Wisconsin-based Brown County Taxpayers Association case is the first to reach the Supreme Court.
The group is asking the high court to block the plan as litigation against it moves forward, claiming the administration exceeded its authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and absent intervention, the organization "will be irreparably harmed" because the policy "will deplete the federal treasury by a staggering amount."
The filing first heads to Justice Amy Coney Barrett--one of the six right-wing justices--but she could refer the matter to the full court, which also includes three left-leaning justices.
The timeline for the court to weigh in is tight, with the application process underway. Millions of people submitted their online forms during beta testing over the weekend. The portal is open until the end of this year, but the White House is encouraging everyone eligible to apply by mid-November.
Over 40 million borrowers are eligible for some student debt relief and nearly 20 million of them could have their entire remaining balance wiped out by the program, according to the White House. Loan payments--which have been paused due to the Covid-19 pandemic--are set to resume in January.
Noting that a district court rejected the right-wing group's request for lack of standing in just five pages and an appeals court did so with only a sentence, CNN analyst and University of Texas at Austin law professor Steve Vladeck projected that this case "is not going anywhere."
However, as Common Dreams has reported, public trust in the high court has hit an all-time low in the wake of several significant rulings from its right-wing majority, and legal experts have warned that this new term could be even more consequential than the last one.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, pointed out that if the high court grants the Wisconsin group's request, it could establish a major new precedent.
"Let us see if SCOTUS will break the court system by giving any taxpayer standing to sue over anything the government is funding that they don't like," he tweeted. "I know lots of anti-war activists that will have calls in to lawyers if they do."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Just two days after U.S. President Joe Biden announced the formal launch of the application for his student debt relief plan, a right-wing group focused on tax policy in Wisconsin asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to temporarily block the program.
Unveiled in August, Biden's plan is set to forgive up to $20,000 for federal borrowers who meet specific income requirements. While progressives have long pushed for even bolder debt cancellation, right-wing politicians and groups have taken aim at the administration's more modest policy.
There are multiple ongoing legal challenges against the program, but the Wisconsin-based Brown County Taxpayers Association case is the first to reach the Supreme Court.
The group is asking the high court to block the plan as litigation against it moves forward, claiming the administration exceeded its authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and absent intervention, the organization "will be irreparably harmed" because the policy "will deplete the federal treasury by a staggering amount."
The filing first heads to Justice Amy Coney Barrett--one of the six right-wing justices--but she could refer the matter to the full court, which also includes three left-leaning justices.
The timeline for the court to weigh in is tight, with the application process underway. Millions of people submitted their online forms during beta testing over the weekend. The portal is open until the end of this year, but the White House is encouraging everyone eligible to apply by mid-November.
Over 40 million borrowers are eligible for some student debt relief and nearly 20 million of them could have their entire remaining balance wiped out by the program, according to the White House. Loan payments--which have been paused due to the Covid-19 pandemic--are set to resume in January.
Noting that a district court rejected the right-wing group's request for lack of standing in just five pages and an appeals court did so with only a sentence, CNN analyst and University of Texas at Austin law professor Steve Vladeck projected that this case "is not going anywhere."
However, as Common Dreams has reported, public trust in the high court has hit an all-time low in the wake of several significant rulings from its right-wing majority, and legal experts have warned that this new term could be even more consequential than the last one.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, pointed out that if the high court grants the Wisconsin group's request, it could establish a major new precedent.
"Let us see if SCOTUS will break the court system by giving any taxpayer standing to sue over anything the government is funding that they don't like," he tweeted. "I know lots of anti-war activists that will have calls in to lawyers if they do."
Just two days after U.S. President Joe Biden announced the formal launch of the application for his student debt relief plan, a right-wing group focused on tax policy in Wisconsin asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to temporarily block the program.
Unveiled in August, Biden's plan is set to forgive up to $20,000 for federal borrowers who meet specific income requirements. While progressives have long pushed for even bolder debt cancellation, right-wing politicians and groups have taken aim at the administration's more modest policy.
There are multiple ongoing legal challenges against the program, but the Wisconsin-based Brown County Taxpayers Association case is the first to reach the Supreme Court.
The group is asking the high court to block the plan as litigation against it moves forward, claiming the administration exceeded its authority and violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and absent intervention, the organization "will be irreparably harmed" because the policy "will deplete the federal treasury by a staggering amount."
The filing first heads to Justice Amy Coney Barrett--one of the six right-wing justices--but she could refer the matter to the full court, which also includes three left-leaning justices.
The timeline for the court to weigh in is tight, with the application process underway. Millions of people submitted their online forms during beta testing over the weekend. The portal is open until the end of this year, but the White House is encouraging everyone eligible to apply by mid-November.
Over 40 million borrowers are eligible for some student debt relief and nearly 20 million of them could have their entire remaining balance wiped out by the program, according to the White House. Loan payments--which have been paused due to the Covid-19 pandemic--are set to resume in January.
Noting that a district court rejected the right-wing group's request for lack of standing in just five pages and an appeals court did so with only a sentence, CNN analyst and University of Texas at Austin law professor Steve Vladeck projected that this case "is not going anywhere."
However, as Common Dreams has reported, public trust in the high court has hit an all-time low in the wake of several significant rulings from its right-wing majority, and legal experts have warned that this new term could be even more consequential than the last one.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, pointed out that if the high court grants the Wisconsin group's request, it could establish a major new precedent.
"Let us see if SCOTUS will break the court system by giving any taxpayer standing to sue over anything the government is funding that they don't like," he tweeted. "I know lots of anti-war activists that will have calls in to lawyers if they do."