SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
White House Director of Communications Kate Bedingfield speaks during a briefing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2022. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP via Getty Images)
White House 'Some Activists' Comment Roils Progressive Abortion Rights Champions
"Republicans refer to their most involved voters as 'the base,' and deliver for them, while Democrats refer to theirs as 'some activists' and ignore them. This is why they lose."
Jul 10, 2022
Comments by White House communications director Kate Bedingfield over the weekend have touched a fresh nerve among progressives already frustrated by the Biden administration's tepid response to the right-wing attack on abortion rights including the U.S. Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade last month.
"The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
Quoted in a detailed piece of reporting by the Washington Post, Bedingfield referred dismissively to those frustrated by the administration's slow and less-than-forceful response to the Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"Joe Biden's goal in responding to Dobbs is not to satisfy some activists who have been consistently out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party," Bedingfield said in on-the-record remarks to the Post on Saturday.
The White House's goal, she continued, is "to deliver help to women who are in danger and assemble a broad-based coalition to defend a woman's right to choose now, just as he assembled such a coalition to win during the 2020 campaign."
It was the phrase "some activists" that many on the progressive left recognized as a specific dig to those who have loudly advocated for an emergency-level response and openly criticized Biden and his lieutenants for failing to adequately acknowledge the level of the crisis.
"What activists are asking for isn't different from what the average voter is looking for--leadership," tweeted Shauna Thomas, co-founder of the women's rights group Ultra Violet, in response to the comment. "To trust that the President is doing everything in his power to save lives and protect our rights. No one is asking Biden to do the impossible. We're asking him to do the maximum."
Thomas specifically pushed back on the suggestion by Bedingfield that a more forceful response to protection of abortion rights wasn't somehow "mainstream"--a claim belied consistently by public polling.
Others, like Rolling Stone journalist Noah Schachtman, argued that Bedingfield's comment should not be considered a casual comment taken out of context.
"This is not a blind quote from some random staffer," said Schachtman. "It's on the record, from Biden's top communications aide. So you can safely assume that shanking pro-choice activists is the White House's official position."
Since the Dobbs ruling was announced on June 24--and previously once a leaked draft of the ruling was published many weeks earlier--progressives have repeatedly asked for the Biden administration to forge a forceful response that would include declaration of health emergency and a robust set of policies and a political program designed to help impacted woman and other pregnant people while laying the legislative groundwork to codify the protections afforded by Roe into federal law once and for all.
Critics of Bedingfield said the mindset exhibited by her comment is not just offensive to many fighting tirelessly for abortion rights and reproductive care, but signals a serious and potentially devastating political blind spot for the Democratic Party come the crucial midterm elections this year.
" Republicans refer to their most involved voters as 'the base,' and deliver for them, while Democrats refer to theirs as 'some activists' and ignore them," said Monica Keane, an independent researcher, on social media. "This is why they lose."
"Such smug arrogance," said Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, professor of African American studies at Princeton University, in response to the White House comment.
"Biden apparently has no idea how his moribund, left for dead, campaign actually won in 2020," Taylor added. "The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Comments by White House communications director Kate Bedingfield over the weekend have touched a fresh nerve among progressives already frustrated by the Biden administration's tepid response to the right-wing attack on abortion rights including the U.S. Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade last month.
"The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
Quoted in a detailed piece of reporting by the Washington Post, Bedingfield referred dismissively to those frustrated by the administration's slow and less-than-forceful response to the Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"Joe Biden's goal in responding to Dobbs is not to satisfy some activists who have been consistently out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party," Bedingfield said in on-the-record remarks to the Post on Saturday.
The White House's goal, she continued, is "to deliver help to women who are in danger and assemble a broad-based coalition to defend a woman's right to choose now, just as he assembled such a coalition to win during the 2020 campaign."
It was the phrase "some activists" that many on the progressive left recognized as a specific dig to those who have loudly advocated for an emergency-level response and openly criticized Biden and his lieutenants for failing to adequately acknowledge the level of the crisis.
"What activists are asking for isn't different from what the average voter is looking for--leadership," tweeted Shauna Thomas, co-founder of the women's rights group Ultra Violet, in response to the comment. "To trust that the President is doing everything in his power to save lives and protect our rights. No one is asking Biden to do the impossible. We're asking him to do the maximum."
Thomas specifically pushed back on the suggestion by Bedingfield that a more forceful response to protection of abortion rights wasn't somehow "mainstream"--a claim belied consistently by public polling.
Others, like Rolling Stone journalist Noah Schachtman, argued that Bedingfield's comment should not be considered a casual comment taken out of context.
"This is not a blind quote from some random staffer," said Schachtman. "It's on the record, from Biden's top communications aide. So you can safely assume that shanking pro-choice activists is the White House's official position."
Since the Dobbs ruling was announced on June 24--and previously once a leaked draft of the ruling was published many weeks earlier--progressives have repeatedly asked for the Biden administration to forge a forceful response that would include declaration of health emergency and a robust set of policies and a political program designed to help impacted woman and other pregnant people while laying the legislative groundwork to codify the protections afforded by Roe into federal law once and for all.
Critics of Bedingfield said the mindset exhibited by her comment is not just offensive to many fighting tirelessly for abortion rights and reproductive care, but signals a serious and potentially devastating political blind spot for the Democratic Party come the crucial midterm elections this year.
" Republicans refer to their most involved voters as 'the base,' and deliver for them, while Democrats refer to theirs as 'some activists' and ignore them," said Monica Keane, an independent researcher, on social media. "This is why they lose."
"Such smug arrogance," said Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, professor of African American studies at Princeton University, in response to the White House comment.
"Biden apparently has no idea how his moribund, left for dead, campaign actually won in 2020," Taylor added. "The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
Comments by White House communications director Kate Bedingfield over the weekend have touched a fresh nerve among progressives already frustrated by the Biden administration's tepid response to the right-wing attack on abortion rights including the U.S. Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade last month.
"The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
Quoted in a detailed piece of reporting by the Washington Post, Bedingfield referred dismissively to those frustrated by the administration's slow and less-than-forceful response to the Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
"Joe Biden's goal in responding to Dobbs is not to satisfy some activists who have been consistently out of step with the mainstream of the Democratic Party," Bedingfield said in on-the-record remarks to the Post on Saturday.
The White House's goal, she continued, is "to deliver help to women who are in danger and assemble a broad-based coalition to defend a woman's right to choose now, just as he assembled such a coalition to win during the 2020 campaign."
It was the phrase "some activists" that many on the progressive left recognized as a specific dig to those who have loudly advocated for an emergency-level response and openly criticized Biden and his lieutenants for failing to adequately acknowledge the level of the crisis.
"What activists are asking for isn't different from what the average voter is looking for--leadership," tweeted Shauna Thomas, co-founder of the women's rights group Ultra Violet, in response to the comment. "To trust that the President is doing everything in his power to save lives and protect our rights. No one is asking Biden to do the impossible. We're asking him to do the maximum."
Thomas specifically pushed back on the suggestion by Bedingfield that a more forceful response to protection of abortion rights wasn't somehow "mainstream"--a claim belied consistently by public polling.
Others, like Rolling Stone journalist Noah Schachtman, argued that Bedingfield's comment should not be considered a casual comment taken out of context.
"This is not a blind quote from some random staffer," said Schachtman. "It's on the record, from Biden's top communications aide. So you can safely assume that shanking pro-choice activists is the White House's official position."
Since the Dobbs ruling was announced on June 24--and previously once a leaked draft of the ruling was published many weeks earlier--progressives have repeatedly asked for the Biden administration to forge a forceful response that would include declaration of health emergency and a robust set of policies and a political program designed to help impacted woman and other pregnant people while laying the legislative groundwork to codify the protections afforded by Roe into federal law once and for all.
Critics of Bedingfield said the mindset exhibited by her comment is not just offensive to many fighting tirelessly for abortion rights and reproductive care, but signals a serious and potentially devastating political blind spot for the Democratic Party come the crucial midterm elections this year.
" Republicans refer to their most involved voters as 'the base,' and deliver for them, while Democrats refer to theirs as 'some activists' and ignore them," said Monica Keane, an independent researcher, on social media. "This is why they lose."
"Such smug arrogance," said Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, professor of African American studies at Princeton University, in response to the White House comment.
"Biden apparently has no idea how his moribund, left for dead, campaign actually won in 2020," Taylor added. "The right rampages and the leadership of the Dems wage war on the left."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.