SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Workers sort packages at a distribution station in the 855,000 square-foot Amazon fulfillment center in Staten Island, one of the five boroughs of New York City, on February 5, 2019. (Photo: Johannes Eisele/AFP via Getty Images)
'This Seems Totally Illegal': Amazon May Ban Union Terms in Messaging App
"In case you've forgotten, union-busting is still disgusting," said the House Labor Caucus.
Apr 04, 2022
On the heels of a major organizing win for Amazon workers in New York City last week, The Intercept revealed Monday that the e-commerce giant is considering a ban on various union-related terms for a planned internal messaging application.
"In November 2021, Amazon convened a high-level meeting in which top executives discussed plans to create an internal social media program that would let employees recognize co-workers' performance with posts called 'Shout-Outs,'" according to journalist Ken Klipperstein.
Klipperstein reported that some Amazon officials expressed concerns about controlling what is shared on the platform, for which a pilot program is slated to launch later this month.
"With free text, we risk people writing Shout-Outs that generate negative sentiments among the viewers and the receivers," says an internal document reviewed by The Intercept. "We want to lean towards being restrictive on the content that can be posted to prevent a negative associate experience."
In addition to profanity, the list of words that would be automatically blocked on the company app reportedly includes: bullying, diversity, ethics, fire, grievance, living wage, pay raise, plantation, restrooms, robots, slave labor, and union.
The company pushed backed: "Our teams are always thinking about new ways to help employees engage with each other," Amazon spokesperson Barbara M. Agrait told the outlet. "This particular program has not been approved yet and may change significantly or even never launch at all."
"If it does launch at some point down the road," the spokesperson added, "there are no plans for many of the words you're calling out to be screened. The only kinds of words that may be screened are ones that are offensive or harassing, which is intended to protect our team."
Meanwhile, worker rights advocates and others attentive to Amazon's labor practices were outraged by the reporting.
"In case you've forgotten, union-busting is still disgusting," tweeted the Labor Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives.
"Spending millions of dollars on anti-union consultants isn't enough for Amazon. Now the company is aggressively cracking down on their workers' freedom of speech in the workplace and outright banning any word tangentially related to labor organizing and working conditions," said Robert Reich, a former U.S. labor secretary who is now a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
"A reminder to every Amazon worker who is about to face this dystopian plan: The corporate giant wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't terrified of your power," Reich continued, adding that the victory in NYC "is proof: Organized people can beat organized money. Keep up the fight."
As Common Dreams reported earlier Monday, the Amazon Labor Union demanded over the weekend that the company start collective bargaining talks in May and halt any changes to employment policies following the successful union vote Friday at a Staten Island warehouse.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On the heels of a major organizing win for Amazon workers in New York City last week, The Intercept revealed Monday that the e-commerce giant is considering a ban on various union-related terms for a planned internal messaging application.
"In November 2021, Amazon convened a high-level meeting in which top executives discussed plans to create an internal social media program that would let employees recognize co-workers' performance with posts called 'Shout-Outs,'" according to journalist Ken Klipperstein.
Klipperstein reported that some Amazon officials expressed concerns about controlling what is shared on the platform, for which a pilot program is slated to launch later this month.
"With free text, we risk people writing Shout-Outs that generate negative sentiments among the viewers and the receivers," says an internal document reviewed by The Intercept. "We want to lean towards being restrictive on the content that can be posted to prevent a negative associate experience."
In addition to profanity, the list of words that would be automatically blocked on the company app reportedly includes: bullying, diversity, ethics, fire, grievance, living wage, pay raise, plantation, restrooms, robots, slave labor, and union.
The company pushed backed: "Our teams are always thinking about new ways to help employees engage with each other," Amazon spokesperson Barbara M. Agrait told the outlet. "This particular program has not been approved yet and may change significantly or even never launch at all."
"If it does launch at some point down the road," the spokesperson added, "there are no plans for many of the words you're calling out to be screened. The only kinds of words that may be screened are ones that are offensive or harassing, which is intended to protect our team."
Meanwhile, worker rights advocates and others attentive to Amazon's labor practices were outraged by the reporting.
"In case you've forgotten, union-busting is still disgusting," tweeted the Labor Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives.
"Spending millions of dollars on anti-union consultants isn't enough for Amazon. Now the company is aggressively cracking down on their workers' freedom of speech in the workplace and outright banning any word tangentially related to labor organizing and working conditions," said Robert Reich, a former U.S. labor secretary who is now a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
"A reminder to every Amazon worker who is about to face this dystopian plan: The corporate giant wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't terrified of your power," Reich continued, adding that the victory in NYC "is proof: Organized people can beat organized money. Keep up the fight."
As Common Dreams reported earlier Monday, the Amazon Labor Union demanded over the weekend that the company start collective bargaining talks in May and halt any changes to employment policies following the successful union vote Friday at a Staten Island warehouse.
On the heels of a major organizing win for Amazon workers in New York City last week, The Intercept revealed Monday that the e-commerce giant is considering a ban on various union-related terms for a planned internal messaging application.
"In November 2021, Amazon convened a high-level meeting in which top executives discussed plans to create an internal social media program that would let employees recognize co-workers' performance with posts called 'Shout-Outs,'" according to journalist Ken Klipperstein.
Klipperstein reported that some Amazon officials expressed concerns about controlling what is shared on the platform, for which a pilot program is slated to launch later this month.
"With free text, we risk people writing Shout-Outs that generate negative sentiments among the viewers and the receivers," says an internal document reviewed by The Intercept. "We want to lean towards being restrictive on the content that can be posted to prevent a negative associate experience."
In addition to profanity, the list of words that would be automatically blocked on the company app reportedly includes: bullying, diversity, ethics, fire, grievance, living wage, pay raise, plantation, restrooms, robots, slave labor, and union.
The company pushed backed: "Our teams are always thinking about new ways to help employees engage with each other," Amazon spokesperson Barbara M. Agrait told the outlet. "This particular program has not been approved yet and may change significantly or even never launch at all."
"If it does launch at some point down the road," the spokesperson added, "there are no plans for many of the words you're calling out to be screened. The only kinds of words that may be screened are ones that are offensive or harassing, which is intended to protect our team."
Meanwhile, worker rights advocates and others attentive to Amazon's labor practices were outraged by the reporting.
"In case you've forgotten, union-busting is still disgusting," tweeted the Labor Caucus in the U.S. House of Representatives.
"Spending millions of dollars on anti-union consultants isn't enough for Amazon. Now the company is aggressively cracking down on their workers' freedom of speech in the workplace and outright banning any word tangentially related to labor organizing and working conditions," said Robert Reich, a former U.S. labor secretary who is now a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
"A reminder to every Amazon worker who is about to face this dystopian plan: The corporate giant wouldn't be doing this if it wasn't terrified of your power," Reich continued, adding that the victory in NYC "is proof: Organized people can beat organized money. Keep up the fight."
As Common Dreams reported earlier Monday, the Amazon Labor Union demanded over the weekend that the company start collective bargaining talks in May and halt any changes to employment policies following the successful union vote Friday at a Staten Island warehouse.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.