SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A woman weeps during a May 27, 2021 City Hall vigil as she kneels by a makeshift memorial for the nine people killed the previous day in a mass shooting at a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) light rail yard in San Jose, California. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
San Jose Set to Pass First-in-Nation Gun Liability Insurance Law
"This will truly save lives," said gun control advocates Moms Demand Action.
Jan 26, 2022
In what one gun control advocate called "a victory for gun safety," the San Jose City Council voted Tuesday to advance a measure that would make the city the first in the nation to require firearm owners to carry liability insurance and pay a yearly fee.
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed."
The San Jose Mercury News reported that in two separate votes, the council preliminarily approved an ordinance to address the detrimental use of firearms "by requiring gun owners to obtain and maintain liability insurance" and pay an annual "harm reduction fee."
Addressing critics' claims that criminals will simply ignore the new law, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat, said in a statement that "while the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun, it does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right."
"We have seen how insurance has reduced auto fatalities over several decades, for example, by incentivizing safer driving and the purchase of cars equipped with airbags and antilock brakes," Liccardo added. "Similarly, gun liability insurance available today on the market can adjust premiums to encourage gun owners to use gun safes, install trigger-locks, and take gun safety classes."
Ewan Barker Plummer, volunteer leader with the Bay Area chapter of the gun control group Students Demand Action, called the vote in the nation's 10th-largest city "a victory for gun safety."
"We all want a safer San Jose, a safer California, and a safer nation," Barker Plummer told The San Francisco Chronicle. "With this approach, we can move closer to that goal."
Esther Peralez-Dieckmann, executive director of NextDoor Solutions to Domestic Violence, told the Mercury News that the proposed law will address gun violence "from a public health standpoint and in the end, make our community safer."
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed," she said.
Liccardo proposed the measure last June after 10 people including the gunman were killed in a May 26, 2021 mass shooting at a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority railyard in the city.
"Cities have learned too well that we cannot wait for Congress to act to protect our residents from gun violence and harm; we must step up," he said. "The two components of this initiative--requiring liability insurance and the investment of gun fees into violence-reduction programs--utilize long-established public health approaches to reducing harm in other contexts."
The proposed ordinance notes that "each year more than 23,000 United States residents die by firearm suicide, 14,000 die by firearm homicide, and nearly 500 die from unintentional firearm injuries," and that "in California, between 2005 and 2015, nearly 4,000 children and teenagers were killed or injured with firearms, and 533 children and teenagers committed suicide with firearms."
"We can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
Liccardo said the $25 annual fee "will directly support community-based organizations employing evidence-based gun harm-reduction initiatives, including domestic violence and suicide prevention programs, drug and mental health treatment, and gun safety classes."
"Overwhelmingly, gun owners and their families will benefit most from those programs," he claimed, "because the services will be focused to reduce risks of harm precisely where that risk is greatest: in households with guns."
"The point is," the mayor told the Mercury News, "we can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
If the new ordinance is approved on a second reading on February 8, it will become law on August 8. Gun rights advocates say they will challenge the new law in court.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what one gun control advocate called "a victory for gun safety," the San Jose City Council voted Tuesday to advance a measure that would make the city the first in the nation to require firearm owners to carry liability insurance and pay a yearly fee.
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed."
The San Jose Mercury News reported that in two separate votes, the council preliminarily approved an ordinance to address the detrimental use of firearms "by requiring gun owners to obtain and maintain liability insurance" and pay an annual "harm reduction fee."
Addressing critics' claims that criminals will simply ignore the new law, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat, said in a statement that "while the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun, it does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right."
"We have seen how insurance has reduced auto fatalities over several decades, for example, by incentivizing safer driving and the purchase of cars equipped with airbags and antilock brakes," Liccardo added. "Similarly, gun liability insurance available today on the market can adjust premiums to encourage gun owners to use gun safes, install trigger-locks, and take gun safety classes."
Ewan Barker Plummer, volunteer leader with the Bay Area chapter of the gun control group Students Demand Action, called the vote in the nation's 10th-largest city "a victory for gun safety."
"We all want a safer San Jose, a safer California, and a safer nation," Barker Plummer told The San Francisco Chronicle. "With this approach, we can move closer to that goal."
Esther Peralez-Dieckmann, executive director of NextDoor Solutions to Domestic Violence, told the Mercury News that the proposed law will address gun violence "from a public health standpoint and in the end, make our community safer."
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed," she said.
Liccardo proposed the measure last June after 10 people including the gunman were killed in a May 26, 2021 mass shooting at a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority railyard in the city.
"Cities have learned too well that we cannot wait for Congress to act to protect our residents from gun violence and harm; we must step up," he said. "The two components of this initiative--requiring liability insurance and the investment of gun fees into violence-reduction programs--utilize long-established public health approaches to reducing harm in other contexts."
The proposed ordinance notes that "each year more than 23,000 United States residents die by firearm suicide, 14,000 die by firearm homicide, and nearly 500 die from unintentional firearm injuries," and that "in California, between 2005 and 2015, nearly 4,000 children and teenagers were killed or injured with firearms, and 533 children and teenagers committed suicide with firearms."
"We can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
Liccardo said the $25 annual fee "will directly support community-based organizations employing evidence-based gun harm-reduction initiatives, including domestic violence and suicide prevention programs, drug and mental health treatment, and gun safety classes."
"Overwhelmingly, gun owners and their families will benefit most from those programs," he claimed, "because the services will be focused to reduce risks of harm precisely where that risk is greatest: in households with guns."
"The point is," the mayor told the Mercury News, "we can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
If the new ordinance is approved on a second reading on February 8, it will become law on August 8. Gun rights advocates say they will challenge the new law in court.
In what one gun control advocate called "a victory for gun safety," the San Jose City Council voted Tuesday to advance a measure that would make the city the first in the nation to require firearm owners to carry liability insurance and pay a yearly fee.
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed."
The San Jose Mercury News reported that in two separate votes, the council preliminarily approved an ordinance to address the detrimental use of firearms "by requiring gun owners to obtain and maintain liability insurance" and pay an annual "harm reduction fee."
Addressing critics' claims that criminals will simply ignore the new law, San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat, said in a statement that "while the Second Amendment protects every citizen's right to own a gun, it does not require taxpayers to subsidize that right."
"We have seen how insurance has reduced auto fatalities over several decades, for example, by incentivizing safer driving and the purchase of cars equipped with airbags and antilock brakes," Liccardo added. "Similarly, gun liability insurance available today on the market can adjust premiums to encourage gun owners to use gun safes, install trigger-locks, and take gun safety classes."
Ewan Barker Plummer, volunteer leader with the Bay Area chapter of the gun control group Students Demand Action, called the vote in the nation's 10th-largest city "a victory for gun safety."
"We all want a safer San Jose, a safer California, and a safer nation," Barker Plummer told The San Francisco Chronicle. "With this approach, we can move closer to that goal."
Esther Peralez-Dieckmann, executive director of NextDoor Solutions to Domestic Violence, told the Mercury News that the proposed law will address gun violence "from a public health standpoint and in the end, make our community safer."
"Whether you're pro-guns or anti-guns, no one can argue that we have substantial injury in our community and substantial issues that need to be addressed," she said.
Liccardo proposed the measure last June after 10 people including the gunman were killed in a May 26, 2021 mass shooting at a Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority railyard in the city.
"Cities have learned too well that we cannot wait for Congress to act to protect our residents from gun violence and harm; we must step up," he said. "The two components of this initiative--requiring liability insurance and the investment of gun fees into violence-reduction programs--utilize long-established public health approaches to reducing harm in other contexts."
The proposed ordinance notes that "each year more than 23,000 United States residents die by firearm suicide, 14,000 die by firearm homicide, and nearly 500 die from unintentional firearm injuries," and that "in California, between 2005 and 2015, nearly 4,000 children and teenagers were killed or injured with firearms, and 533 children and teenagers committed suicide with firearms."
"We can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
Liccardo said the $25 annual fee "will directly support community-based organizations employing evidence-based gun harm-reduction initiatives, including domestic violence and suicide prevention programs, drug and mental health treatment, and gun safety classes."
"Overwhelmingly, gun owners and their families will benefit most from those programs," he claimed, "because the services will be focused to reduce risks of harm precisely where that risk is greatest: in households with guns."
"The point is," the mayor told the Mercury News, "we can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook."
If the new ordinance is approved on a second reading on February 8, it will become law on August 8. Gun rights advocates say they will challenge the new law in court.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.