SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Making permanent the expansion of the child tax credit would "dramatically reduce childhood poverty in the United States," a group of over 400 economists wrote congressional leaders (Photo: Stock/Getty Images)
400+ Economists Press Congress to Permanently Expand Child Tax Credit
Such an expansion would "dramatically reduce childhood poverty in the United States," they said.
Sep 16, 2021
A group of over 400 economists on Wednesday sent a letter to congressional leaders calling for the expanded child tax credit to be made permanent, citing "potential tremendous immediate and long-term benefits for children and their families."
The America Recovery Plan, prompted by the pandemic, expanded the child tax credit (CTC), first enacted over two decades ago. In addition to boosting the amount of the credit to up to $3,600 for parents of younger children, it advanced half of the credit ahead of tax-filing time.
The third round of payments from the CTC hit bank accounts this week, with parents of eligible children under age 6 receiving $300 per child, and those of kids aged 6 to 17 receiving $250 per child. The payments have already been shown to have a positive impact by helping families with household expenses, including being able to put enough food on the table.
That economic aid has been especially crucial because "childhood poverty is a staggering problem in the United States, affecting approximately one in seven children, and one in five children of color, even before the Covid-19 pandemic began," the economists wrote in their letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
As it stands now, eligible families--a couple making $150,000 or a single head of household making $112,500--are on track to receive just three more rounds of checks this year. But the letter's signatories, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and inequality expert Emmanuel Saez, pointed to four broad areas to argue for making the CTC permanent, including that it would "dramatically reduce childhood poverty in the United States."
Such an expansion, the economists wrote, would also bring about "a long-term fiscal payoff," since "reducing child poverty has a positive effect on earnings in adulthood." And because families' health would improve, government medical expenditures for those receiving the aid would drop.
In fact, the letter added, "once the full effects of the CTC expansion are accounted for, the net cost to taxpayers of the expansion has been estimated to be as little as approximately 16 cents for every $1 of new benefits."
The economists also rejected the argument that making the CTC permanent would remove incentives to work, noting in part that because "the expanded CTC amount would not phase out until high levels of earnings... most families would not see their CTC amount decline if their income rises."
There's also evidence the payments are simply being used to meet basic needs, the letter said. "With the first monthly payments of the temporary CTC expansion in the United States," the letter noted, "families increased spending on food, clothes, utilities, [and] school supplies, and reduced debt, and food insecurity declined dramatically."
House Democrats, meanwhile, have proposed continuing the CTC aid through 2025. The outcome of that push, however, remains uncertain, as it would be part of the reconciliation bill, which needs support from all Democrats to pass.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A group of over 400 economists on Wednesday sent a letter to congressional leaders calling for the expanded child tax credit to be made permanent, citing "potential tremendous immediate and long-term benefits for children and their families."
The America Recovery Plan, prompted by the pandemic, expanded the child tax credit (CTC), first enacted over two decades ago. In addition to boosting the amount of the credit to up to $3,600 for parents of younger children, it advanced half of the credit ahead of tax-filing time.
The third round of payments from the CTC hit bank accounts this week, with parents of eligible children under age 6 receiving $300 per child, and those of kids aged 6 to 17 receiving $250 per child. The payments have already been shown to have a positive impact by helping families with household expenses, including being able to put enough food on the table.
That economic aid has been especially crucial because "childhood poverty is a staggering problem in the United States, affecting approximately one in seven children, and one in five children of color, even before the Covid-19 pandemic began," the economists wrote in their letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
As it stands now, eligible families--a couple making $150,000 or a single head of household making $112,500--are on track to receive just three more rounds of checks this year. But the letter's signatories, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and inequality expert Emmanuel Saez, pointed to four broad areas to argue for making the CTC permanent, including that it would "dramatically reduce childhood poverty in the United States."
Such an expansion, the economists wrote, would also bring about "a long-term fiscal payoff," since "reducing child poverty has a positive effect on earnings in adulthood." And because families' health would improve, government medical expenditures for those receiving the aid would drop.
In fact, the letter added, "once the full effects of the CTC expansion are accounted for, the net cost to taxpayers of the expansion has been estimated to be as little as approximately 16 cents for every $1 of new benefits."
The economists also rejected the argument that making the CTC permanent would remove incentives to work, noting in part that because "the expanded CTC amount would not phase out until high levels of earnings... most families would not see their CTC amount decline if their income rises."
There's also evidence the payments are simply being used to meet basic needs, the letter said. "With the first monthly payments of the temporary CTC expansion in the United States," the letter noted, "families increased spending on food, clothes, utilities, [and] school supplies, and reduced debt, and food insecurity declined dramatically."
House Democrats, meanwhile, have proposed continuing the CTC aid through 2025. The outcome of that push, however, remains uncertain, as it would be part of the reconciliation bill, which needs support from all Democrats to pass.
A group of over 400 economists on Wednesday sent a letter to congressional leaders calling for the expanded child tax credit to be made permanent, citing "potential tremendous immediate and long-term benefits for children and their families."
The America Recovery Plan, prompted by the pandemic, expanded the child tax credit (CTC), first enacted over two decades ago. In addition to boosting the amount of the credit to up to $3,600 for parents of younger children, it advanced half of the credit ahead of tax-filing time.
The third round of payments from the CTC hit bank accounts this week, with parents of eligible children under age 6 receiving $300 per child, and those of kids aged 6 to 17 receiving $250 per child. The payments have already been shown to have a positive impact by helping families with household expenses, including being able to put enough food on the table.
That economic aid has been especially crucial because "childhood poverty is a staggering problem in the United States, affecting approximately one in seven children, and one in five children of color, even before the Covid-19 pandemic began," the economists wrote in their letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
As it stands now, eligible families--a couple making $150,000 or a single head of household making $112,500--are on track to receive just three more rounds of checks this year. But the letter's signatories, including Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz and inequality expert Emmanuel Saez, pointed to four broad areas to argue for making the CTC permanent, including that it would "dramatically reduce childhood poverty in the United States."
Such an expansion, the economists wrote, would also bring about "a long-term fiscal payoff," since "reducing child poverty has a positive effect on earnings in adulthood." And because families' health would improve, government medical expenditures for those receiving the aid would drop.
In fact, the letter added, "once the full effects of the CTC expansion are accounted for, the net cost to taxpayers of the expansion has been estimated to be as little as approximately 16 cents for every $1 of new benefits."
The economists also rejected the argument that making the CTC permanent would remove incentives to work, noting in part that because "the expanded CTC amount would not phase out until high levels of earnings... most families would not see their CTC amount decline if their income rises."
There's also evidence the payments are simply being used to meet basic needs, the letter said. "With the first monthly payments of the temporary CTC expansion in the United States," the letter noted, "families increased spending on food, clothes, utilities, [and] school supplies, and reduced debt, and food insecurity declined dramatically."
House Democrats, meanwhile, have proposed continuing the CTC aid through 2025. The outcome of that push, however, remains uncertain, as it would be part of the reconciliation bill, which needs support from all Democrats to pass.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.