Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) talks to reporters while leaving the U.S. Capitol on August 9, 2021. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
Aug 26, 2021
Anticipating a clash with conservative Democrats over the price tag of the party's emerging reconciliation package, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday laid down a clear marker: the $3.5 trillion in spending outlined in a newly approved budget resolution is already the compromise, and anything less won't cut it.
"I already negotiated. The truth is we need more," Sanders (I-Vt.), chair of the Senate Budget Committee and chief architect of the reconciliation blueprint, told Politico in an interview published Thursday.
"While it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The needs are there," the Vermont senator added. "This is, in my view, the minimum of what we should be spending."
Sanders' remarks came less than 48 hours after the House Democratic leadership quelled a small revolt of right-wing members and passed the $3.5 trillion budget resolution, which the Vermont senator helped usher through the upper chamber earlier this month.
Congressional approval of the budget blueprint--which establishes the outer boundaries of the reconciliation package--sets in motion the likely contentious process of converting the popular resolution into legislative text. With Republicans unanimously opposed to the filibuster-proof reconciliation package, Democrats will need the support of virtually every member of the House and Senate to ensure it reaches President Joe Biden's desk, a reality Sanders acknowledged Thursday.
"Democrats have a very slim majority in the House. We have no majority in the Senate. That's it. It is 50/50," Sanders said. "Trust me, there are a lot of differences in the Senate among the Democrats. But at the end of the day, every Democrat understands that it is terribly important that we support the president's agenda. And most of these ideas came from the White House."
But conservative Democrats in both chambers are already threatening to derail the reconciliation process by expressing opposition to the $3.5 trillion price tag--which, as Sanders noted, is significant downward compromise from the $6 trillion proposal that he and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) were originally considering.
Earlier this week, a spokesperson for Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) reiterated that "she will not support a budget reconciliation bill that costs $3.5 trillion"--music to the ears of Republicans who are openly hoping that Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) team up to pare back the legislation, in which progressives hope to include historic investments in green energy, Medicare expansion, and other top priorities.
A $3.5 trillion bill could also face trouble in the House, where at least nine conservative Democrats have voiced "concerns about the level of spending and potential revenue raisers." Among the revenue raisers floated for the reconciliation package are tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations, proposals that are popular with the U.S. public but opposed by some right-leaning Democrats--many of them bankrolled by powerful corporate interests.
In his Politico interview Thursday, Sanders made clear that he views "every single thing" in the reconciliation framework--from the proposed lowering of the Medicare eligibility age to paid family and medical leave--as essential, though he declined to say what he would do if such priorities were stripped from the package.
\u201cUnless we pass the reconciliation bill:\n\n-Seniors won't get dental, vision, hearing & home care\n\n-Drug prices will soar\n\n-Families will be denied $300 a month per kid\n\n-Climate change will worsen.\n\n-Families won't receive childcare & affordable housing\n\nNo reconciliation, no deal\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1629826566
On Friday, Sanders is set to travel to the Republican stronghold of Indiana to advocate for a $3.5 trillion reconciliation package. Two days later, the Vermont senator will hold a town hall on the legislation in Iowa.
"Sanders said if he could, he would travel to all 50 states this fall to make his case," Politico reported Thursday. "And he did not rule out West Virginia and Arizona, home to the Senate's two most conservative Democrats."
In a statement last week announcing his trips to Indiana and Iowa, Sanders said that "while it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan to finally invest in the long-neglected needs of working families."
"I very much look forward to hearing from some of them," Sanders added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Anticipating a clash with conservative Democrats over the price tag of the party's emerging reconciliation package, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday laid down a clear marker: the $3.5 trillion in spending outlined in a newly approved budget resolution is already the compromise, and anything less won't cut it.
"I already negotiated. The truth is we need more," Sanders (I-Vt.), chair of the Senate Budget Committee and chief architect of the reconciliation blueprint, told Politico in an interview published Thursday.
"While it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The needs are there," the Vermont senator added. "This is, in my view, the minimum of what we should be spending."
Sanders' remarks came less than 48 hours after the House Democratic leadership quelled a small revolt of right-wing members and passed the $3.5 trillion budget resolution, which the Vermont senator helped usher through the upper chamber earlier this month.
Congressional approval of the budget blueprint--which establishes the outer boundaries of the reconciliation package--sets in motion the likely contentious process of converting the popular resolution into legislative text. With Republicans unanimously opposed to the filibuster-proof reconciliation package, Democrats will need the support of virtually every member of the House and Senate to ensure it reaches President Joe Biden's desk, a reality Sanders acknowledged Thursday.
"Democrats have a very slim majority in the House. We have no majority in the Senate. That's it. It is 50/50," Sanders said. "Trust me, there are a lot of differences in the Senate among the Democrats. But at the end of the day, every Democrat understands that it is terribly important that we support the president's agenda. And most of these ideas came from the White House."
But conservative Democrats in both chambers are already threatening to derail the reconciliation process by expressing opposition to the $3.5 trillion price tag--which, as Sanders noted, is significant downward compromise from the $6 trillion proposal that he and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) were originally considering.
Earlier this week, a spokesperson for Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) reiterated that "she will not support a budget reconciliation bill that costs $3.5 trillion"--music to the ears of Republicans who are openly hoping that Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) team up to pare back the legislation, in which progressives hope to include historic investments in green energy, Medicare expansion, and other top priorities.
A $3.5 trillion bill could also face trouble in the House, where at least nine conservative Democrats have voiced "concerns about the level of spending and potential revenue raisers." Among the revenue raisers floated for the reconciliation package are tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations, proposals that are popular with the U.S. public but opposed by some right-leaning Democrats--many of them bankrolled by powerful corporate interests.
In his Politico interview Thursday, Sanders made clear that he views "every single thing" in the reconciliation framework--from the proposed lowering of the Medicare eligibility age to paid family and medical leave--as essential, though he declined to say what he would do if such priorities were stripped from the package.
\u201cUnless we pass the reconciliation bill:\n\n-Seniors won't get dental, vision, hearing & home care\n\n-Drug prices will soar\n\n-Families will be denied $300 a month per kid\n\n-Climate change will worsen.\n\n-Families won't receive childcare & affordable housing\n\nNo reconciliation, no deal\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1629826566
On Friday, Sanders is set to travel to the Republican stronghold of Indiana to advocate for a $3.5 trillion reconciliation package. Two days later, the Vermont senator will hold a town hall on the legislation in Iowa.
"Sanders said if he could, he would travel to all 50 states this fall to make his case," Politico reported Thursday. "And he did not rule out West Virginia and Arizona, home to the Senate's two most conservative Democrats."
In a statement last week announcing his trips to Indiana and Iowa, Sanders said that "while it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan to finally invest in the long-neglected needs of working families."
"I very much look forward to hearing from some of them," Sanders added.
Anticipating a clash with conservative Democrats over the price tag of the party's emerging reconciliation package, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Thursday laid down a clear marker: the $3.5 trillion in spending outlined in a newly approved budget resolution is already the compromise, and anything less won't cut it.
"I already negotiated. The truth is we need more," Sanders (I-Vt.), chair of the Senate Budget Committee and chief architect of the reconciliation blueprint, told Politico in an interview published Thursday.
"While it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders
"The needs are there," the Vermont senator added. "This is, in my view, the minimum of what we should be spending."
Sanders' remarks came less than 48 hours after the House Democratic leadership quelled a small revolt of right-wing members and passed the $3.5 trillion budget resolution, which the Vermont senator helped usher through the upper chamber earlier this month.
Congressional approval of the budget blueprint--which establishes the outer boundaries of the reconciliation package--sets in motion the likely contentious process of converting the popular resolution into legislative text. With Republicans unanimously opposed to the filibuster-proof reconciliation package, Democrats will need the support of virtually every member of the House and Senate to ensure it reaches President Joe Biden's desk, a reality Sanders acknowledged Thursday.
"Democrats have a very slim majority in the House. We have no majority in the Senate. That's it. It is 50/50," Sanders said. "Trust me, there are a lot of differences in the Senate among the Democrats. But at the end of the day, every Democrat understands that it is terribly important that we support the president's agenda. And most of these ideas came from the White House."
But conservative Democrats in both chambers are already threatening to derail the reconciliation process by expressing opposition to the $3.5 trillion price tag--which, as Sanders noted, is significant downward compromise from the $6 trillion proposal that he and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) were originally considering.
Earlier this week, a spokesperson for Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) reiterated that "she will not support a budget reconciliation bill that costs $3.5 trillion"--music to the ears of Republicans who are openly hoping that Sinema and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) team up to pare back the legislation, in which progressives hope to include historic investments in green energy, Medicare expansion, and other top priorities.
A $3.5 trillion bill could also face trouble in the House, where at least nine conservative Democrats have voiced "concerns about the level of spending and potential revenue raisers." Among the revenue raisers floated for the reconciliation package are tax hikes on wealthy individuals and large corporations, proposals that are popular with the U.S. public but opposed by some right-leaning Democrats--many of them bankrolled by powerful corporate interests.
In his Politico interview Thursday, Sanders made clear that he views "every single thing" in the reconciliation framework--from the proposed lowering of the Medicare eligibility age to paid family and medical leave--as essential, though he declined to say what he would do if such priorities were stripped from the package.
\u201cUnless we pass the reconciliation bill:\n\n-Seniors won't get dental, vision, hearing & home care\n\n-Drug prices will soar\n\n-Families will be denied $300 a month per kid\n\n-Climate change will worsen.\n\n-Families won't receive childcare & affordable housing\n\nNo reconciliation, no deal\u201d— Bernie Sanders (@Bernie Sanders) 1629826566
On Friday, Sanders is set to travel to the Republican stronghold of Indiana to advocate for a $3.5 trillion reconciliation package. Two days later, the Vermont senator will hold a town hall on the legislation in Iowa.
"Sanders said if he could, he would travel to all 50 states this fall to make his case," Politico reported Thursday. "And he did not rule out West Virginia and Arizona, home to the Senate's two most conservative Democrats."
In a statement last week announcing his trips to Indiana and Iowa, Sanders said that "while it will have no Republican support in Washington, Democrats, independents, and working-class Republicans all over the country support our plan to finally invest in the long-neglected needs of working families."
"I very much look forward to hearing from some of them," Sanders added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.