SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Voters arrive at Waddell Language Academy in Charlotte, North Carolina shortly after the polls opened on November 3, 2020. A state court on Monday ordered election officials to restore voting rights to about 56,000 formerly incarcerated people. (Photo: Grant Baldwin / AFP via Getty Images)
'Incredible': Court Restores Voting Rights for 55K Former Felons in North Carolina
While GOP lawmakers ready an appeal, voting rights advocates move to ensure formerly incarcerated people know about the ruling.
Aug 24, 2021
Voting rights advocates in North Carolina on Tuesday applauded a ruling by a panel of three state Superior Court judges for taking "the first step" in restoring justice to tens of thousands of formerly incarcerated people convicted of felonies in the state.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander."
--Michael McDonald, University of Florida
A panel of the Superior Court voted 2-1 to restore voting rights to about 55,000 people who have been incarcerated for felonies in a decision that would terminate a state law which bars people from voting if they are still on probation, parole, or serving a suspended sentence.
Republican lawmakers in the state vowed to appeal the decision promptly, but advocates who have been working to fight disenfranchisement in the state celebrated the victory, saying it would be the largest expansion of voting rights in North Carolina since the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed.
"Yesterday was the first step in restoring the voice of those silenced," tweeted Forward Justice, a civil rights group based in Durham which joined several other organizations in filing a lawsuit challenging the law.
Voting rights advocates have said the law unfairly disenfranchises people who remain under supervision of the criminal justice system when they can't pay court fees and people who are given "community supervision" sentences instead of being sent to prison--in which case they continue paying taxes while being disenfranchised.
"Our biggest quarrels in this state have been over what groups of people have a voice at the ballot box to be included in 'We the People,'" Daryl Atkinson, co-director of Forward Justice, said at a press conference Monday. "Today, we enlarged the 'we' in 'We the people.'"
The ACLU called the ruling, which would make North Carolina the only state in the South to automatically restore voting rights to people after they're released from prison, "incredible news."
Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who studies American elections, said the Superior Court panel's ruling bodes well for civil rights in the state even as Republicans are expected to attempt a partisan redistricting process.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander," McDonald said on social media.
The same panel ruled last year that the state law's requirement that formerly incarcerated people pay all court fees and fines before regaining their right to vote was "unenforceable," according to the Washington Post.
GOP lawmakers said Tuesday that they plan to file an appeal before a state deadline for finalizing materials for the 2021 election and that they may attempt to appeal using their own attorney after the Democratic state attorney general, Josh Stein, said he was unable to file an immediate appeal because the ruling has not officially been written yet.
Advocates who sued over the state law said they would immediately begin outreach efforts to people who are formerly incarcerated to make sure they're aware of the ruling, and the state Board of Elections said it would immediately begin updating voter registration materials and information on its website to reflect the panel's ruling.
"Starting tomorrow, we plan to start a voter registration drive across the state," Dennis Gaddy, founder of Community Success Initiative, another plaintiff in last year's lawsuit, told the News & Observer.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Voting rights advocates in North Carolina on Tuesday applauded a ruling by a panel of three state Superior Court judges for taking "the first step" in restoring justice to tens of thousands of formerly incarcerated people convicted of felonies in the state.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander."
--Michael McDonald, University of Florida
A panel of the Superior Court voted 2-1 to restore voting rights to about 55,000 people who have been incarcerated for felonies in a decision that would terminate a state law which bars people from voting if they are still on probation, parole, or serving a suspended sentence.
Republican lawmakers in the state vowed to appeal the decision promptly, but advocates who have been working to fight disenfranchisement in the state celebrated the victory, saying it would be the largest expansion of voting rights in North Carolina since the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed.
"Yesterday was the first step in restoring the voice of those silenced," tweeted Forward Justice, a civil rights group based in Durham which joined several other organizations in filing a lawsuit challenging the law.
Voting rights advocates have said the law unfairly disenfranchises people who remain under supervision of the criminal justice system when they can't pay court fees and people who are given "community supervision" sentences instead of being sent to prison--in which case they continue paying taxes while being disenfranchised.
"Our biggest quarrels in this state have been over what groups of people have a voice at the ballot box to be included in 'We the People,'" Daryl Atkinson, co-director of Forward Justice, said at a press conference Monday. "Today, we enlarged the 'we' in 'We the people.'"
The ACLU called the ruling, which would make North Carolina the only state in the South to automatically restore voting rights to people after they're released from prison, "incredible news."
Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who studies American elections, said the Superior Court panel's ruling bodes well for civil rights in the state even as Republicans are expected to attempt a partisan redistricting process.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander," McDonald said on social media.
The same panel ruled last year that the state law's requirement that formerly incarcerated people pay all court fees and fines before regaining their right to vote was "unenforceable," according to the Washington Post.
GOP lawmakers said Tuesday that they plan to file an appeal before a state deadline for finalizing materials for the 2021 election and that they may attempt to appeal using their own attorney after the Democratic state attorney general, Josh Stein, said he was unable to file an immediate appeal because the ruling has not officially been written yet.
Advocates who sued over the state law said they would immediately begin outreach efforts to people who are formerly incarcerated to make sure they're aware of the ruling, and the state Board of Elections said it would immediately begin updating voter registration materials and information on its website to reflect the panel's ruling.
"Starting tomorrow, we plan to start a voter registration drive across the state," Dennis Gaddy, founder of Community Success Initiative, another plaintiff in last year's lawsuit, told the News & Observer.
Voting rights advocates in North Carolina on Tuesday applauded a ruling by a panel of three state Superior Court judges for taking "the first step" in restoring justice to tens of thousands of formerly incarcerated people convicted of felonies in the state.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander."
--Michael McDonald, University of Florida
A panel of the Superior Court voted 2-1 to restore voting rights to about 55,000 people who have been incarcerated for felonies in a decision that would terminate a state law which bars people from voting if they are still on probation, parole, or serving a suspended sentence.
Republican lawmakers in the state vowed to appeal the decision promptly, but advocates who have been working to fight disenfranchisement in the state celebrated the victory, saying it would be the largest expansion of voting rights in North Carolina since the 1965 Voting Rights Act was passed.
"Yesterday was the first step in restoring the voice of those silenced," tweeted Forward Justice, a civil rights group based in Durham which joined several other organizations in filing a lawsuit challenging the law.
Voting rights advocates have said the law unfairly disenfranchises people who remain under supervision of the criminal justice system when they can't pay court fees and people who are given "community supervision" sentences instead of being sent to prison--in which case they continue paying taxes while being disenfranchised.
"Our biggest quarrels in this state have been over what groups of people have a voice at the ballot box to be included in 'We the People,'" Daryl Atkinson, co-director of Forward Justice, said at a press conference Monday. "Today, we enlarged the 'we' in 'We the people.'"
The ACLU called the ruling, which would make North Carolina the only state in the South to automatically restore voting rights to people after they're released from prison, "incredible news."
Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who studies American elections, said the Superior Court panel's ruling bodes well for civil rights in the state even as Republicans are expected to attempt a partisan redistricting process.
"If the North Carolina courts are expanding voting rights by removing felony disenfranchisement, I can't imagine they will allow a Republican gerrymander," McDonald said on social media.
The same panel ruled last year that the state law's requirement that formerly incarcerated people pay all court fees and fines before regaining their right to vote was "unenforceable," according to the Washington Post.
GOP lawmakers said Tuesday that they plan to file an appeal before a state deadline for finalizing materials for the 2021 election and that they may attempt to appeal using their own attorney after the Democratic state attorney general, Josh Stein, said he was unable to file an immediate appeal because the ruling has not officially been written yet.
Advocates who sued over the state law said they would immediately begin outreach efforts to people who are formerly incarcerated to make sure they're aware of the ruling, and the state Board of Elections said it would immediately begin updating voter registration materials and information on its website to reflect the panel's ruling.
"Starting tomorrow, we plan to start a voter registration drive across the state," Dennis Gaddy, founder of Community Success Initiative, another plaintiff in last year's lawsuit, told the News & Observer.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.