Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Google on phone

A group of U.S. attorneys general on Wednesday filed suit over Google's behavior related to its mobile application store. (Photo Illustration: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

37 AGs Hit Google, 'Gatekeeper of Our Digital Devices,' With New Antitrust Lawsuit

The suit claims the tech giant "enjoys virtually unchallenged power over Android app distribution and Android in-app purchases of digital content that extends to every state, district, and territory in the United States."

Jessica Corbett

Google and parent company Alphabet were hit with yet another federal antitrust lawsuit on Wednesday—this one filed in a San Francisco-based U.S. district court by the attorneys general of 36 states and Washington, D.C.

"Through its illegal conduct, the company has ensured that hundreds of millions of Android users turn to Google, and only Google, for the millions of applications they may choose to download to their phones and tablets."
—New York Attorney General Letitia James

"Google has served as the gatekeeper of the internet for many years, but, more recently, it has also become the gatekeeper of our digital devices—resulting in all of us paying more for the software we use every day," said New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is co-leading the bipartisan coalition with the AGs of North Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah.

This suit focuses on the company's behavior related to Google Play Store, its application store for Android devices.

Google, which acquired the Android mobile operating system in 2005, "promised repeatedly that Android would be the basis for an 'open' ecosystem in which industry participants could freely compete," the complaint (pdf) says.

"Instead, Google has taken steps to close the ecosystem from competition and insert itself as the middleman between app developers and consumers," according to the AGs. "Unbeknownst to most consumers who own a mobile device running Android, every time they purchase an app from the Google Play Store, or purchase digital content or subscriptions within an app, up to 30% of the money they pay goes to Google."

The complaint goes on to say that "Google enjoys virtually unchallenged power over Android app distribution and Android in-app purchases of digital content that extends to every state, district, and territory in the United States."

The case focuses on five categories of alleged anti-competitive conduct. The complaint claims:

  • Google creates and imposes broad practical, technological, and contractual impediments to effectively close the Android app distribution ecosystem;
  • Google disincentivizes and discourages competition from the only market participants that could otherwise avoid the technological restrictions and be well-positioned to compete in app distribution—Android device manufacturers and mobile network operators;
  • Google has focused its anti-competitive strategies on Samsung, the largest manufacturer of Android devices sold in the United States;
  • Google launched incentive programs to share monopoly profits with large app developers that might be capable of disrupting Google's app distribution monopoly; and
  • Google mandates that consumers who download apps from the Google Play Store also use Google Play Billing for all in-app purchases.

As James put it: "Once again, we are seeing Google use its dominance to illegally quash competition and profit to the tune of billions."

"Through its illegal conduct, the company has ensured that hundreds of millions of Android users turn to Google, and only Google, for the millions of applications they may choose to download to their phones and tablets," she said.

"Worse yet, Google is squeezing the lifeblood out of millions of small businesses that are only seeking to compete," James added. "We are filing this lawsuit to end Google's illegal monopoly power and finally give voice to millions of consumers and business owners."

In a statement to Yahoo! Finance before the suit was filed, a Google spokesperson defended the company's app store policies, saying that "Android is the only major operating system that allows people to download apps from multiple app stores."

"In fact, most Android devices ship with two or more app stores preinstalled," Google's spokesperson added. "They can also install additional app stores or apps directly from their browser if they choose."

This is just one of many suits faced by by company, as Politico pointed out Wednesday:

Google also faces a suit that the Justice Department and 14 states filed in October, focused on Google's efforts to dominate the mobile search market; one from 38 states and territories filed in December, also focused on search; and a third suit by 15 states and territories related to Google's power over the advertising technology.

Wednesday's filing notably comes just days after a federal judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed a pair of lawsuits that the Federal Trade Commission and a coalition of AGs led by James brought against fellow tech giant Facebook.

As Common Dreams reported, Alex Harman, competition policy advocate for Public Citizen, responded with a call for congressional action, saying that "once again, our antitrust laws have been shown by the courts to be woefully inadequate to address the abuses of the richest companies in the world."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

'We Need Action': Biden, Democrats Urged to Protect Abortion Access in Post-Roe US

"The Supreme Court doesn't get the final say on abortion," Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Tina Smith wrote in a new op-ed.

Kenny Stancil ·


Motorist 'Tried to Murder' Abortion Rights Advocates at Iowa Protest, Witnesses Say

Although one witness said the driver went "out of his way" to hit pro-choice protestors in the street, Cedar Rapids police declined to make an arrest.

Kenny Stancil ·


'A Hate Crime': Oslo Pride Parade Canceled After Deadly Shooting at Gay Bar

A 42-year-old gunman has been charged with terrorism following what Norway's prime minister called a "terrible and deeply shocking attack on innocent people."

Kenny Stancil ·


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·


80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo