SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
New York City mayoral candidate Eric Adams greets supporters before the first in person televised debate on June 02, 2021 in New York City. Early voting in the city began Saturday for the Democratic primary the will take place on June 22. (Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)
NYC Mayoral Candidate Eric Adams Rebuked for 'Dangerous' 400-Students-to-1-Teacher Theory
"Defunding schools to the point that we have a 400:1 student-to-teacher ratio so we can bankroll another huge expansion in an already-multibillion dollar police budget," said Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, "is how you build a school-to-prison pipeline."
Jun 12, 2021
Eric Adams, among the leading Democratic candidates in New York City's heated mayoral contest, came under fire from outside progressives and fellow New York Democratic lawmakers Saturday for saying that a single public school teacher should be responsible for the education of between 300 to 400 students at one time.
"Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen." --Rep. Jamaal Bowman
"By using the new technology of remote learning you don't need school children to be in a school building with a number of teachers--it's just the opposite," Adams said in an interview clip posted Friday afternoon that has since garnered more than one million views online.
"You could have one great teacher that's in one of our specialized high schools," he argued, "to teach 300-400 students who are struggling in math with the skillful way they are able to teach."
Watch:
With early voting kicking off Saturday, and New York City instituting a ranked-choice voting (RCV) process in a mayoral race for the very first time, the comments by Adams--a former police officer currently the Borough President of Brooklyn and leading the race in recent polls--riled progressives, included notable members of New York's congressional delegation like Reps. Jamaal Bowman and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
"This is dangerous," tweeted Bowman late Friday night alongside the clip. "For a year, our kids have endured the trauma of remote learning--without their peers, teachers, counselors or coaches. The learning loss, emotional & mental stress are well-documented. As is the depression. Adams would make remote learning the status quo."
"How will a teacher answer questions from 400 kids?" he continued. "How will a teacher give individualized attention to a child who needs it? Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen."
On Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez--who, like Bowman, has endorsed Maya Wiley in the race as a more progressive alternative to Adams--also jumped in to rebuke the comments.
According to Chalkbeat, which recently assessed all the top Democratic candidates on the ballot, Wiley and Adams offer a stark contrast when it comes to education policy, specifically on the questions of class size and in-person learning.
"Reducing class sizes is a priority in Wiley's plan to 'create a just and vibrant school system,'" the outlet reported earlier this week. Her plan would include spending $250 million--a mix of federal and state dollars--to hire 2,500 new teachers to achieve those smaller classes and to give students extra instructional and emotional support as the district emerges from the pandemic.
"Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
Adam's plan, on the other hand, would include an expanded, "long-term remote learning option, funded by levying a Data Tax on big tech companies that sell private data to advertisers and others.The Data Tax would help pay for a unit of remote learning experts who would oversee the program." The teachers union has come out strongly against Adams' in the race.
Adrienne Bell, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Brand New Congress and also a school teacher, weighed in as well.
"I teach," Bell said on Saturday. "Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
And Washington Post columnist and book author Helaine Olen was succinct in her denunciation. "This should be outright disqualifying," she said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Eric Adams, among the leading Democratic candidates in New York City's heated mayoral contest, came under fire from outside progressives and fellow New York Democratic lawmakers Saturday for saying that a single public school teacher should be responsible for the education of between 300 to 400 students at one time.
"Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen." --Rep. Jamaal Bowman
"By using the new technology of remote learning you don't need school children to be in a school building with a number of teachers--it's just the opposite," Adams said in an interview clip posted Friday afternoon that has since garnered more than one million views online.
"You could have one great teacher that's in one of our specialized high schools," he argued, "to teach 300-400 students who are struggling in math with the skillful way they are able to teach."
Watch:
With early voting kicking off Saturday, and New York City instituting a ranked-choice voting (RCV) process in a mayoral race for the very first time, the comments by Adams--a former police officer currently the Borough President of Brooklyn and leading the race in recent polls--riled progressives, included notable members of New York's congressional delegation like Reps. Jamaal Bowman and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
"This is dangerous," tweeted Bowman late Friday night alongside the clip. "For a year, our kids have endured the trauma of remote learning--without their peers, teachers, counselors or coaches. The learning loss, emotional & mental stress are well-documented. As is the depression. Adams would make remote learning the status quo."
"How will a teacher answer questions from 400 kids?" he continued. "How will a teacher give individualized attention to a child who needs it? Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen."
On Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez--who, like Bowman, has endorsed Maya Wiley in the race as a more progressive alternative to Adams--also jumped in to rebuke the comments.
According to Chalkbeat, which recently assessed all the top Democratic candidates on the ballot, Wiley and Adams offer a stark contrast when it comes to education policy, specifically on the questions of class size and in-person learning.
"Reducing class sizes is a priority in Wiley's plan to 'create a just and vibrant school system,'" the outlet reported earlier this week. Her plan would include spending $250 million--a mix of federal and state dollars--to hire 2,500 new teachers to achieve those smaller classes and to give students extra instructional and emotional support as the district emerges from the pandemic.
"Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
Adam's plan, on the other hand, would include an expanded, "long-term remote learning option, funded by levying a Data Tax on big tech companies that sell private data to advertisers and others.The Data Tax would help pay for a unit of remote learning experts who would oversee the program." The teachers union has come out strongly against Adams' in the race.
Adrienne Bell, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Brand New Congress and also a school teacher, weighed in as well.
"I teach," Bell said on Saturday. "Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
And Washington Post columnist and book author Helaine Olen was succinct in her denunciation. "This should be outright disqualifying," she said.
From Your Site Articles
- NYC Mayor Cancels DC Meetings as FBI Raids Home of His Fundraising Chief ›
- Opinion | New York City Deserves Better Than Eric Adams | Common Dreams ›
- Teachers Union Sues NYC Mayor Over 'Draconian' Budget Cuts ›
- New Yorkers Repulsed After Eric Adams Campaign Submitted Dead People's Signatures on Election Petition | Common Dreams ›
Eric Adams, among the leading Democratic candidates in New York City's heated mayoral contest, came under fire from outside progressives and fellow New York Democratic lawmakers Saturday for saying that a single public school teacher should be responsible for the education of between 300 to 400 students at one time.
"Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen." --Rep. Jamaal Bowman
"By using the new technology of remote learning you don't need school children to be in a school building with a number of teachers--it's just the opposite," Adams said in an interview clip posted Friday afternoon that has since garnered more than one million views online.
"You could have one great teacher that's in one of our specialized high schools," he argued, "to teach 300-400 students who are struggling in math with the skillful way they are able to teach."
Watch:
With early voting kicking off Saturday, and New York City instituting a ranked-choice voting (RCV) process in a mayoral race for the very first time, the comments by Adams--a former police officer currently the Borough President of Brooklyn and leading the race in recent polls--riled progressives, included notable members of New York's congressional delegation like Reps. Jamaal Bowman and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
"This is dangerous," tweeted Bowman late Friday night alongside the clip. "For a year, our kids have endured the trauma of remote learning--without their peers, teachers, counselors or coaches. The learning loss, emotional & mental stress are well-documented. As is the depression. Adams would make remote learning the status quo."
"How will a teacher answer questions from 400 kids?" he continued. "How will a teacher give individualized attention to a child who needs it? Our kids are not machines. They need attention and care. That can't happen through a screen."
On Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez--who, like Bowman, has endorsed Maya Wiley in the race as a more progressive alternative to Adams--also jumped in to rebuke the comments.
According to Chalkbeat, which recently assessed all the top Democratic candidates on the ballot, Wiley and Adams offer a stark contrast when it comes to education policy, specifically on the questions of class size and in-person learning.
"Reducing class sizes is a priority in Wiley's plan to 'create a just and vibrant school system,'" the outlet reported earlier this week. Her plan would include spending $250 million--a mix of federal and state dollars--to hire 2,500 new teachers to achieve those smaller classes and to give students extra instructional and emotional support as the district emerges from the pandemic.
"Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
Adam's plan, on the other hand, would include an expanded, "long-term remote learning option, funded by levying a Data Tax on big tech companies that sell private data to advertisers and others.The Data Tax would help pay for a unit of remote learning experts who would oversee the program." The teachers union has come out strongly against Adams' in the race.
Adrienne Bell, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Brand New Congress and also a school teacher, weighed in as well.
"I teach," Bell said on Saturday. "Eric Adams has no idea what he is talking about. These thoughts are dangerous to the education of our children."
And Washington Post columnist and book author Helaine Olen was succinct in her denunciation. "This should be outright disqualifying," she said.
From Your Site Articles
- NYC Mayor Cancels DC Meetings as FBI Raids Home of His Fundraising Chief ›
- Opinion | New York City Deserves Better Than Eric Adams | Common Dreams ›
- Teachers Union Sues NYC Mayor Over 'Draconian' Budget Cuts ›
- New Yorkers Repulsed After Eric Adams Campaign Submitted Dead People's Signatures on Election Petition | Common Dreams ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.