A group photo showing the plaintiffs in the landmark youth-led Juliana v. United States climate lawsuit. (Photo: Our Children's Trust)
Feb 09, 2021
For the second time in as many years, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected a landmark climate lawsuit brought by a group of young people--who say they will now take their case to the United States Supreme Court.
"I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
--Sahara V., plaintiff
BloombergLawreports the San Francisco-based federal appeals court denied (pdf) a request by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States for the full court to hear their full constitutional climate suit.
The lawsuit argues that the federal government is directly fueling the climate crisis by maintaining an energy system that causes global heating, and that in doing so the government has violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, public trust, and equal protection under the law.
The litigants--who were children and teenagers when their lawsuit was filed in 2015--had sought a second chance after a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court threw out the case by a vote of 2-1 last January.
\u201cThe youth plaintiffs will now turn to the Supreme Court to correct legal errors made in the 9th Circuit\u2019s Jan. 2020 ruling unless the Biden administration and DOJ come to the settlement table to protect the youths\u2019 rights. https://t.co/pRfO3qVi5H 2/2\n\n#youthvgov\u201d— Our Children's Trust (@Our Children's Trust) 1612989738
While the judges had concurred that the climate crisis has brought the world close to the "eve of destruction" and that "the government's contribution to climate change is not simply a result of inaction," they "reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large," according to the ruling.
In a scathing dissent to the 2020 ruling, Judge Josephine Staton wrote that "the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response--yet presses ahead toward calamity."
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses."
--Judge Josephine Staton,
January 2020
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," she added. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the nation."
The plaintiffs said Wednesday that they would press forward with their case. They also appealed to the Biden administration and U.S. Department of Justice to reach a settlement in the case.
"I hope and need the Biden administration to hear what the youth are saying, and to recognize how we are disproportionately affected by climate change," plaintiff Sahara V. said in a statement (pdf). "I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel for Our Children's Trust--the nonprofit public interest law firm representing the plaintiffs--added that "the 9th Circuit failed to correct the legal errors in the panel decision."
"It's now up to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the ability of our federal courts to interpret the U.S. Constitution and resolve controversies through a declaration of law," Olson added.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
For the second time in as many years, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected a landmark climate lawsuit brought by a group of young people--who say they will now take their case to the United States Supreme Court.
"I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
--Sahara V., plaintiff
BloombergLawreports the San Francisco-based federal appeals court denied (pdf) a request by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States for the full court to hear their full constitutional climate suit.
The lawsuit argues that the federal government is directly fueling the climate crisis by maintaining an energy system that causes global heating, and that in doing so the government has violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, public trust, and equal protection under the law.
The litigants--who were children and teenagers when their lawsuit was filed in 2015--had sought a second chance after a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court threw out the case by a vote of 2-1 last January.
\u201cThe youth plaintiffs will now turn to the Supreme Court to correct legal errors made in the 9th Circuit\u2019s Jan. 2020 ruling unless the Biden administration and DOJ come to the settlement table to protect the youths\u2019 rights. https://t.co/pRfO3qVi5H 2/2\n\n#youthvgov\u201d— Our Children's Trust (@Our Children's Trust) 1612989738
While the judges had concurred that the climate crisis has brought the world close to the "eve of destruction" and that "the government's contribution to climate change is not simply a result of inaction," they "reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large," according to the ruling.
In a scathing dissent to the 2020 ruling, Judge Josephine Staton wrote that "the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response--yet presses ahead toward calamity."
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses."
--Judge Josephine Staton,
January 2020
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," she added. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the nation."
The plaintiffs said Wednesday that they would press forward with their case. They also appealed to the Biden administration and U.S. Department of Justice to reach a settlement in the case.
"I hope and need the Biden administration to hear what the youth are saying, and to recognize how we are disproportionately affected by climate change," plaintiff Sahara V. said in a statement (pdf). "I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel for Our Children's Trust--the nonprofit public interest law firm representing the plaintiffs--added that "the 9th Circuit failed to correct the legal errors in the panel decision."
"It's now up to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the ability of our federal courts to interpret the U.S. Constitution and resolve controversies through a declaration of law," Olson added.
For the second time in as many years, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected a landmark climate lawsuit brought by a group of young people--who say they will now take their case to the United States Supreme Court.
"I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
--Sahara V., plaintiff
BloombergLawreports the San Francisco-based federal appeals court denied (pdf) a request by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States for the full court to hear their full constitutional climate suit.
The lawsuit argues that the federal government is directly fueling the climate crisis by maintaining an energy system that causes global heating, and that in doing so the government has violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, public trust, and equal protection under the law.
The litigants--who were children and teenagers when their lawsuit was filed in 2015--had sought a second chance after a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court threw out the case by a vote of 2-1 last January.
\u201cThe youth plaintiffs will now turn to the Supreme Court to correct legal errors made in the 9th Circuit\u2019s Jan. 2020 ruling unless the Biden administration and DOJ come to the settlement table to protect the youths\u2019 rights. https://t.co/pRfO3qVi5H 2/2\n\n#youthvgov\u201d— Our Children's Trust (@Our Children's Trust) 1612989738
While the judges had concurred that the climate crisis has brought the world close to the "eve of destruction" and that "the government's contribution to climate change is not simply a result of inaction," they "reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large," according to the ruling.
In a scathing dissent to the 2020 ruling, Judge Josephine Staton wrote that "the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response--yet presses ahead toward calamity."
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses."
--Judge Josephine Staton,
January 2020
"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," she added. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the nation."
The plaintiffs said Wednesday that they would press forward with their case. They also appealed to the Biden administration and U.S. Department of Justice to reach a settlement in the case.
"I hope and need the Biden administration to hear what the youth are saying, and to recognize how we are disproportionately affected by climate change," plaintiff Sahara V. said in a statement (pdf). "I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel for Our Children's Trust--the nonprofit public interest law firm representing the plaintiffs--added that "the 9th Circuit failed to correct the legal errors in the panel decision."
"It's now up to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the ability of our federal courts to interpret the U.S. Constitution and resolve controversies through a declaration of law," Olson added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.