Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Children and teenagers filed a climate lawsuit against the U.S. government in 2015. (Photo: Our Children's Trust, with permission)

A group photo showing the plaintiffs in the landmark youth-led Juliana v. United States climate lawsuit. (Photo: Our Children's Trust)

After 9th Circuit Decision, Youth Climate Campaigners Vow to Take Landmark Case to Supreme Court

"The 9th Circuit failed to correct the legal errors in the panel decision," said the lead attorney in the case, who added that the case is now up to the nation's highest court.

Brett Wilkins

For the second time in as many years, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday rejected a landmark climate lawsuit brought by a group of young people—who say they will now take their case to the United States Supreme Court. 

 "I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."
—Sahara V., plaintiff 

Bloomberg Law reports the San Francisco-based federal appeals court denied (pdf) a request by plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States for the full court to hear their full constitutional climate suit.

The lawsuit argues that the federal government is directly fueling the climate crisis by maintaining an energy system that causes global heating, and that in doing so the government has violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, public trust, and equal protection under the law. 

The litigants—who were children and teenagers when their lawsuit was filed in 2015—had sought a second chance after a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court threw out the case by a vote of 2-1 last January. 

While the judges had concurred that the climate crisis has brought the world close to the "eve of destruction" and that "the government's contribution to climate change is not simply a result of inaction," they "reluctantly concluded that the plaintiffs' case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large," according to the ruling. 

In a scathing dissent to the 2020 ruling, Judge Josephine Staton wrote that "the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward calamity."

"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses."
—Judge Josephine Staton, 
January 2020

"It is as if an asteroid were barreling toward Earth and the government decided to shut down our only defenses," she added. "Seeking to quash this suit, the government bluntly insists that it has the absolute and unreviewable power to destroy the nation." 

The plaintiffs said Wednesday that they would press forward with their case. They also appealed to the Biden administration and U.S. Department of Justice to reach a settlement in the case. 

"I hope and need the Biden administration to hear what the youth are saying, and to recognize how we are disproportionately affected by climate change," plaintiff Sahara V. said in a statement (pdf). "I hope that President Joe Biden will understand the crisis we're in, stop fighting our claims and our rights, and will decide to come to the settlement table in our case."

Julia Olson, executive director and chief legal counsel for Our Children's Trust—the nonprofit public interest law firm representing the plaintiffs—added that "the 9th Circuit failed to correct the legal errors in the panel decision."

"It's now up to the U.S. Supreme Court to protect the ability of our federal courts to interpret the U.S. Constitution and resolve controversies through a declaration of law," Olson added. 


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Michigan Judge Blocks Enforcement of 'Chilling and Dangerous' 1931 Abortion Ban

The decision is a "welcome" development "but our work continues," said Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, vowing to use "every tool in my toolbox to fight like hell for women and healthcare providers."

Jessica Corbett ·


Tlaib Says Biden Must 'Hold Israel Accountable' for Raid on Palestinian Rights Groups

"The silence by our country is enabling more death and violence," said the U.S. congresswoman.

Jake Johnson ·


Corporate Media Mostly Mum as US Strikes Kill at Least 20 in Somalia

"This is a completely under-the-radar news story, one that was curiously absent from the headlines in all of the major newspapers this morning," wrote one expert after the latest U.S. strike on Somalia.

Brett Wilkins ·


'Terrible Idea': Biden Preparing to Shift Costs of Covid Treatments, Vaccines to Patients

"We must push back," said one doctor. "Free provision of vaccinations, Paxlovid, and monoclonals has been critically important."

Kenny Stancil ·


Trump-Appointed Judge Permanently Blocks Biden's Oil and Gas Leasing Moratorium

Fossil fuel extraction on federal lands and waters has accounted for an estimated 25% of all U.S. carbon emissions since 2005.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo