Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Butchers cutting beef in a slaughterhouse while wearing face masks. (Photo: Getty Images/Stock)

"Want to Know What a Worker's Life Is Worth in America?" Trump's OSHA Fines Meat Company Just $13,494 for Infecting 1,294 Employees With Covid

"$13,494 is a bug splat on the windshield for this massive company, apparently just like those workers' lives were."

Jake Johnson

The Trump Labor Department's Occupational Safety and Health Administration on Thursday announced a fine of just $13,494 against a major meat processing company whose persistent and egregious failure to protect South Dakota factory employees from Covid-19 caused at least 1,294 infections, 43 hospitalizations, and four deaths.

"Want to know what a worker's life is worth in America?" HuffPost labor reporter Dave Jamieson tweeted in response to the meager fine against Smithfield Foods, whose Sioux Falls, South Dakota plant was in April dubbed "the country's biggest coronavirus hot spot."

The fine against Smithfield amounts to around $10 per infected employee, a penalty the Democrat-controlled House Committee on Education and Labor denounced as "a total failure to protect workers."

As Jamieson pointed out, "$13,494 is the maximum OSHA can issue for a 'serious' violation. The max for a 'willful' or 'repeated' violation is $134,937. Of course, those amounts are rounding errors for a company of Smithfield's size."

"Many companies routinely fight OSHA citations even when the fines are this small, with the litigation dragging on for years," Jamieson noted. "Decent chance the final tab gets negotiated down or wiped out entirely."

Matt Pearce, national correspondent for the Los Angeles Times, tweeted that "$13,494 is a bug splat on the windshield for this massive company, apparently just like those workers' lives were."

The Labor Department's fine is the product of a months-long investigation into Smithfield, which attempted in July to quash an OSHA subpoena for the company's Covid-19 test results, characterizing the document request as an invasion of privacy and violation of the company's due process rights.

The meat processing giant has come under fire from workers and union leaders for failing to swiftly establish adequate safety precautions at its Sioux Falls plant, which at one point in April accounted for 44% of all of South Dakota's positive coronavirus cases. That same month, Smithfield offered Sioux Fall employees a $500 "responsibility bonus" for showing up to work amid growing health concerns.

"I feel like they're bribing us with money to come to work sick," one unnamed worker told the local Argus Leader. "That's how you know they don't care, because they're forcing people to come to work. People are forcing themselves to come to work even when they're sick."

Kooper Caraway, president of the Sioux Falls AFL-CIO, blamed the deadly Covid-19 outbreak at the South Dakota pork factory on the inaction of Smithfield management in the face of pleas for stronger protections.

"Because management drug its feet and didn't act quickly, that's why it's a hot spot," Caraway said in April. "And we're seeing the cases go up every day. No matter what the latest numbers are, I promise you there's more than that."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

ACLU Demands 'Truly Systemic Overhaul' of US Civilian Harm Policies

"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," says director of the legal group's National Security Project.

Jessica Corbett ·


'This Is Not Over': Alaska Supreme Court Rejects Youth Climate Case

"With the state continuing to undermine their health, safety, and futures," said the plaintiffs' lead counsel, "we will evaluate our next steps and will continue to fight for climate justice."

Jessica Corbett ·


Analysis Finds 'Staggering' Rise in Voter Suppression After GOP Restrictions in Georgia

"This is why we are fighting this new law in court," said one voting rights advocate.

Brett Wilkins ·


'Egregious': Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down Mail-In Voting Law

The ruling was stayed pending an appeal to the state's Supreme Court and as one voting advocate put it: "The fight's not over yet, folks."

Julia Conley ·


Big Win for Open Internet as Court Upholds California Net Neutrality Law

One legal advocate called the Ninth Circuit's opinion "a great decision and a major victory for internet users in California and nationwide."

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo