Battling a forest fire in Boguchany District in 2019; over 1 million hectares of woodland were hit by wildfires in Russia's Krasnoyarsk Territory last year. (Photo: Donat Sorokin\TASS via Getty Images)
Aug 31, 2020
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, told The Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington told The Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independent reported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardian reported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, told The Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington told The Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independent reported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardian reported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, told The Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington told The Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independent reported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardian reported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.