SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Abraham Bonowitz of Columbus, Ohio, joins fellow members of the Abolitionist Action Committee during an annual protest and hunger strike against the death penalty outside the U.S. Supreme Court July 1, 2019 in Washington, D.C. The committee has been organizing the "Starvin' for Justice: Fast and Vigil to Abolish the Death Penalty" protest for 26 years. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Citing Likelihood of 'Extreme Pain and Needless Suffering,' US Judge Halts Resumption of Federal Executions
"We haven't had a federal execution in 17 years: There is absolutely no reason for the government to rush forward with such a reckless and dangerous plan."
Jul 13, 2020
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A U.S. district judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from resuming federal executions after a 17-year informal break--a decision that came mere hours before inmate Daniel Lewis Lee was set to be killed by lethal injection at the prison in Terre Haute, Indiana despite objections from victims' relatives and human rights advocates.
Judge Tanya Chutkan of Washington, D.C. issued a preliminary injunction preventing the execution of Lee and three other death row inmates while courts hear their respective challenges to the administration's controversial lethal injection protocol involving the sole drug pentobarbital, which replaced a three-drug cocktail that had supply issues.
Chutkan reportedly ruled that the protocol secretly developed early in President Donald Trump's first term and announced by U.S. Attorney General William Barr in July 2019 is "very likely to cause extreme pain and needless suffering," which would make it unconstitutional, as a violation the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Lee was set to be killed at 4 pm local time on Monday. The federal government had also planned to execute two other inmates at the Indiana prison--Wesley Ira Purkey and Dustin Lee Honken--later this week, followed by Keith Dwayne Nelson on August 28.
As NPR reported Monday:
Chutkan said the last-minute ruling only hours before executions were set to resume for the first time in 17 years was "unfortunate," but she blamed the Justice Department for racing ahead before legal challenges had been fully aired.
...
The decision came amid a wave of litigation involving family members of victims and religious advisers to the men on federal death row.
Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court may have the final word.
Chutkan concluded in her opinion (pdf) that there are still legal issues to be resolved, writing that "the public is not served by short-circuiting legitimate judicial process, and is greatly served by attempting to ensure that the most serious punishment is imposed in a manner consistent with our Constitution," according to The Hill.
Shawn Nolan, one of the inmates' attorneys, welcomed Chutkan's decision in a statement also reported by The Hill.
"The government has been trying to plow forward with these executions despite many unanswered questions about the legality of its new execution protocol," Nolan said. "The district court's injunction ensures that the courts will have the opportunity to carefully address those issues."
"Given that these executions threaten to become Coivd-19 super-spreader events," Nolan added, "the injunction will also protect the lives and health of the correctional staff, victim family members, spiritual advisors, attorneys, and others who must witness the executions."
The news was also celebrated by anti-death penalty activists who gathered in Indiana Monday:
The Justice Department immediately appealed Chutkan's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, according to the Associated Press.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A U.S. district judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from resuming federal executions after a 17-year informal break--a decision that came mere hours before inmate Daniel Lewis Lee was set to be killed by lethal injection at the prison in Terre Haute, Indiana despite objections from victims' relatives and human rights advocates.
Judge Tanya Chutkan of Washington, D.C. issued a preliminary injunction preventing the execution of Lee and three other death row inmates while courts hear their respective challenges to the administration's controversial lethal injection protocol involving the sole drug pentobarbital, which replaced a three-drug cocktail that had supply issues.
Chutkan reportedly ruled that the protocol secretly developed early in President Donald Trump's first term and announced by U.S. Attorney General William Barr in July 2019 is "very likely to cause extreme pain and needless suffering," which would make it unconstitutional, as a violation the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Lee was set to be killed at 4 pm local time on Monday. The federal government had also planned to execute two other inmates at the Indiana prison--Wesley Ira Purkey and Dustin Lee Honken--later this week, followed by Keith Dwayne Nelson on August 28.
As NPR reported Monday:
Chutkan said the last-minute ruling only hours before executions were set to resume for the first time in 17 years was "unfortunate," but she blamed the Justice Department for racing ahead before legal challenges had been fully aired.
...
The decision came amid a wave of litigation involving family members of victims and religious advisers to the men on federal death row.
Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court may have the final word.
Chutkan concluded in her opinion (pdf) that there are still legal issues to be resolved, writing that "the public is not served by short-circuiting legitimate judicial process, and is greatly served by attempting to ensure that the most serious punishment is imposed in a manner consistent with our Constitution," according to The Hill.
Shawn Nolan, one of the inmates' attorneys, welcomed Chutkan's decision in a statement also reported by The Hill.
"The government has been trying to plow forward with these executions despite many unanswered questions about the legality of its new execution protocol," Nolan said. "The district court's injunction ensures that the courts will have the opportunity to carefully address those issues."
"Given that these executions threaten to become Coivd-19 super-spreader events," Nolan added, "the injunction will also protect the lives and health of the correctional staff, victim family members, spiritual advisors, attorneys, and others who must witness the executions."
The news was also celebrated by anti-death penalty activists who gathered in Indiana Monday:
The Justice Department immediately appealed Chutkan's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, according to the Associated Press.
This is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
A U.S. district judge on Monday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from resuming federal executions after a 17-year informal break--a decision that came mere hours before inmate Daniel Lewis Lee was set to be killed by lethal injection at the prison in Terre Haute, Indiana despite objections from victims' relatives and human rights advocates.
Judge Tanya Chutkan of Washington, D.C. issued a preliminary injunction preventing the execution of Lee and three other death row inmates while courts hear their respective challenges to the administration's controversial lethal injection protocol involving the sole drug pentobarbital, which replaced a three-drug cocktail that had supply issues.
Chutkan reportedly ruled that the protocol secretly developed early in President Donald Trump's first term and announced by U.S. Attorney General William Barr in July 2019 is "very likely to cause extreme pain and needless suffering," which would make it unconstitutional, as a violation the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Lee was set to be killed at 4 pm local time on Monday. The federal government had also planned to execute two other inmates at the Indiana prison--Wesley Ira Purkey and Dustin Lee Honken--later this week, followed by Keith Dwayne Nelson on August 28.
As NPR reported Monday:
Chutkan said the last-minute ruling only hours before executions were set to resume for the first time in 17 years was "unfortunate," but she blamed the Justice Department for racing ahead before legal challenges had been fully aired.
...
The decision came amid a wave of litigation involving family members of victims and religious advisers to the men on federal death row.
Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court may have the final word.
Chutkan concluded in her opinion (pdf) that there are still legal issues to be resolved, writing that "the public is not served by short-circuiting legitimate judicial process, and is greatly served by attempting to ensure that the most serious punishment is imposed in a manner consistent with our Constitution," according to The Hill.
Shawn Nolan, one of the inmates' attorneys, welcomed Chutkan's decision in a statement also reported by The Hill.
"The government has been trying to plow forward with these executions despite many unanswered questions about the legality of its new execution protocol," Nolan said. "The district court's injunction ensures that the courts will have the opportunity to carefully address those issues."
"Given that these executions threaten to become Coivd-19 super-spreader events," Nolan added, "the injunction will also protect the lives and health of the correctional staff, victim family members, spiritual advisors, attorneys, and others who must witness the executions."
The news was also celebrated by anti-death penalty activists who gathered in Indiana Monday:
The Justice Department immediately appealed Chutkan's ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, according to the Associated Press.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.