A sign warns residents to take steps to contol the coronavirus outbreak at the entrance to the Manhattan Bridge in Brooklyn on March 19, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Victor J. Blue/Getty Images)
Mar 20, 2020
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.
President Donald Trump's Labor Department is asking states not to release hard unemployment numbers, the latest attempt by the White House to downplay the economic and real-world consequences of the coronavirus outbreak.
"The Trump administration would apparently rather you not hear those numbers," MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes told his audience Thursday night.
\u201cBREAKING: Trump admin. asking state officials to hold off releasing unemployment numbers: NYT.\u201d— All In with Chris Hayes (@All In with Chris Hayes) 1584666178
The New York Timesbroke the story Thursday night, citing an email sent to state officials from Office of Employment Insurance administrator Gay Gilbert asking states to only "provide information using generalities to describe claims levels (very high, large increase)" until the Labor Department releases its numbers on March 26.
"States should not provide numeric values to the public," said Gilbert.
Investment bank Goldman Sachs is predicting that claims increased by 2.25 million in the last week, a "historic and frankly apocalyptic surge" as Wall Street Journal reporter Micahel Derby described it, with no historical parallel in U.S. history.
\u201cGoldman Sachs warns data point to a historic and frankly apocalyptic surge in unemployment insurance claims, from current 281,000 to 2,250,000 in next week\u2019s report. Yes you read that right.\u201d— Michael S. Derby (@Michael S. Derby) 1584666159
The numbers are so unique, New School economist James Parrrott told Gothamist, because the damage being done by the virus has no precedent in modern history.
"In a recession, you'll see sort of episodic layoffs and business closings," said Parrott. "The numbers mount up over time. This was a completely different situation where for public health reasons... businesses were ordered to close en masse. So that is why we've never had anything like that before."
Observers were unimpressed by the latest White House attempt to clamp down on information which could reflect poorly on Trump's handling of the crisis.
"The Trump administration would like to extend to labor market data its highly successful approach to coronavirus data," New York Times opinion editor Binyamin Applebaum tweeted sarcastically. "I can only imagine how much markets would enjoy a little more uncertainty."
Predictions on Friday from analysts claimed that the economy could contract by as much as 14% in the second quarter--a level of economic decline not seen since World War II.
\u201cThese numbers are heart-stopping: \n\n-JPMorgan Chase estimates US economy could shrink by 14% b/t April & June, biggest contraction post-World War II\n- Goldman Sachs estimates 2.25 million filed for unemployment, nearly tenfold increase from week ago https://t.co/cyzpYs9mtc\u201d— Jim Sciutto (@Jim Sciutto) 1584712705
rinceton University historian Matt Karp said the data makes clear it's past time for a massive government intervention in the economy.
"How long can American society survive this kind of mass unemployment?" Karp tweeted. "Is even an epic $3T stimulus enough?"
"Seems like we need heroic WW2-style govt planning efforts to ramp up healthcare capacity, so the country can get back to work by May, even as hundreds of thousands get sick," Karp said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.