

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Women raise their fists a protest on the International Women's Day in Mexico City on March 8, 2020. (Photo: Manuel Velasquez/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
Millions of women across Mexico took part in Monday's "Un Dia Sin Nosotras" or "A Day Without Us" strike, staying home from work and school to protest the country's high rates of femicide and other forms of gender-based violence just a day after an estimated 80,000 people marched in Mexico City to mark International Women's Day.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen, or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
--Lluvia Flores Gomez, bakery owner
"In Mexico it's like we're in a state of war; we're in a humanitarian crisis because of the quantity of women that have disappeared or been killed," National Citizen's Observatory of Femicide coordinator Maria de la Luz Estrada told the Associated Press.
The AP reported that "government data say 3,825 women met violent deaths last year, 7% more than in 2018. That works out to about 10 women slain each day in Mexico. Thousands more have gone missing without a trace in recent years. Authorities seem incapable of preventing or properly investigating the crimes, very few of which result in convictions."
Sandra Reyes, a 33-year-old biologist at the National Cancer Institute, told the Guardian that Monday's strike sent a clear message to Mexican society. "In some ways, it's a taunt: if you do not want us out here in the streets, we'll disappear," she said.
The Mexican business group Concanaco Servytur estimated that the strike could have cost the country's economy up to $1.37 billion.
Despite the cost, some businesses gave women paid leave for the day in solidarity while others shut down entirely. According to the AP:
[The strike] is about "showing, socially... how valuable we women are, our contribution, and what would happen if one day we were not around. In all aspects: as homemakers, asworkers, as consumers," said Lluvia Flores Gomez, 40, who was sipping coffee and reading a book on the couch at home in the historic downtown instead of going to work.
Flores shuttered her bakery in observation of the strike, though she said her employees--all women--would be paid for the day. She said the business would take an economic hit, but it was important to call attention to all the ways women are under attack in Mexico--not only murder, disappearance, and rape, but also home and workplace discrimination and lack of equal opportunity.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen," she said, "or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
Participants and supporters of the nationwide 24-hour work stoppage, also dubbed "A Day Without Women," posted updates on social media with the hashtags #UnDiaSinMujeres, #UnDiaSinNosotras, and #UnDiaSinEllas. They shared photos of closed shops and restaurants as well as empty desks and subway cars.
"Our government urgently needs to take action. We hope the strike opens their eyes," Marisela Villapando, who drives Uber part-time, told VICE. Villapando, who said she knows four women who were murdered or disappeared in the past year, added that "we live in fear."
Elsa Arista Gonzalez, a 40-year-old a law student and coffee shop employee, echoed that sentiment in comments to the Guardian.
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore," said Gonzalez. "We've become used to living in fear."
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore... We've become used to living in fear."
--Arista Gonzalez, law student and coffee shop employee
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on Monday delivered conflicting messages about the strike--both claiming that the government is working every day to address gender-based violence and also suggesting that some of the anger directed at his administration over the issue "is conservatism disguised as feminism."
"This movement has various aspects," AMLO, as the president is known, said during a morning news conference. "It's a movement of women who legitimately fight for their rights and against violence, against femicides. But there is another part that is against us, and what they want is for the government to fail."
AMLO's comments angered Mexican journalist Guadalupe Loaeza, according to the Washington Post.
"The president has been provoking us with his indifference, with his comments," Loaeza said. "He does not grasp that this is about feminism. He misrepresents it, distorts it by saying that it is conservatism."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Millions of women across Mexico took part in Monday's "Un Dia Sin Nosotras" or "A Day Without Us" strike, staying home from work and school to protest the country's high rates of femicide and other forms of gender-based violence just a day after an estimated 80,000 people marched in Mexico City to mark International Women's Day.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen, or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
--Lluvia Flores Gomez, bakery owner
"In Mexico it's like we're in a state of war; we're in a humanitarian crisis because of the quantity of women that have disappeared or been killed," National Citizen's Observatory of Femicide coordinator Maria de la Luz Estrada told the Associated Press.
The AP reported that "government data say 3,825 women met violent deaths last year, 7% more than in 2018. That works out to about 10 women slain each day in Mexico. Thousands more have gone missing without a trace in recent years. Authorities seem incapable of preventing or properly investigating the crimes, very few of which result in convictions."
Sandra Reyes, a 33-year-old biologist at the National Cancer Institute, told the Guardian that Monday's strike sent a clear message to Mexican society. "In some ways, it's a taunt: if you do not want us out here in the streets, we'll disappear," she said.
The Mexican business group Concanaco Servytur estimated that the strike could have cost the country's economy up to $1.37 billion.
Despite the cost, some businesses gave women paid leave for the day in solidarity while others shut down entirely. According to the AP:
[The strike] is about "showing, socially... how valuable we women are, our contribution, and what would happen if one day we were not around. In all aspects: as homemakers, asworkers, as consumers," said Lluvia Flores Gomez, 40, who was sipping coffee and reading a book on the couch at home in the historic downtown instead of going to work.
Flores shuttered her bakery in observation of the strike, though she said her employees--all women--would be paid for the day. She said the business would take an economic hit, but it was important to call attention to all the ways women are under attack in Mexico--not only murder, disappearance, and rape, but also home and workplace discrimination and lack of equal opportunity.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen," she said, "or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
Participants and supporters of the nationwide 24-hour work stoppage, also dubbed "A Day Without Women," posted updates on social media with the hashtags #UnDiaSinMujeres, #UnDiaSinNosotras, and #UnDiaSinEllas. They shared photos of closed shops and restaurants as well as empty desks and subway cars.
"Our government urgently needs to take action. We hope the strike opens their eyes," Marisela Villapando, who drives Uber part-time, told VICE. Villapando, who said she knows four women who were murdered or disappeared in the past year, added that "we live in fear."
Elsa Arista Gonzalez, a 40-year-old a law student and coffee shop employee, echoed that sentiment in comments to the Guardian.
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore," said Gonzalez. "We've become used to living in fear."
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore... We've become used to living in fear."
--Arista Gonzalez, law student and coffee shop employee
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on Monday delivered conflicting messages about the strike--both claiming that the government is working every day to address gender-based violence and also suggesting that some of the anger directed at his administration over the issue "is conservatism disguised as feminism."
"This movement has various aspects," AMLO, as the president is known, said during a morning news conference. "It's a movement of women who legitimately fight for their rights and against violence, against femicides. But there is another part that is against us, and what they want is for the government to fail."
AMLO's comments angered Mexican journalist Guadalupe Loaeza, according to the Washington Post.
"The president has been provoking us with his indifference, with his comments," Loaeza said. "He does not grasp that this is about feminism. He misrepresents it, distorts it by saying that it is conservatism."
Millions of women across Mexico took part in Monday's "Un Dia Sin Nosotras" or "A Day Without Us" strike, staying home from work and school to protest the country's high rates of femicide and other forms of gender-based violence just a day after an estimated 80,000 people marched in Mexico City to mark International Women's Day.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen, or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
--Lluvia Flores Gomez, bakery owner
"In Mexico it's like we're in a state of war; we're in a humanitarian crisis because of the quantity of women that have disappeared or been killed," National Citizen's Observatory of Femicide coordinator Maria de la Luz Estrada told the Associated Press.
The AP reported that "government data say 3,825 women met violent deaths last year, 7% more than in 2018. That works out to about 10 women slain each day in Mexico. Thousands more have gone missing without a trace in recent years. Authorities seem incapable of preventing or properly investigating the crimes, very few of which result in convictions."
Sandra Reyes, a 33-year-old biologist at the National Cancer Institute, told the Guardian that Monday's strike sent a clear message to Mexican society. "In some ways, it's a taunt: if you do not want us out here in the streets, we'll disappear," she said.
The Mexican business group Concanaco Servytur estimated that the strike could have cost the country's economy up to $1.37 billion.
Despite the cost, some businesses gave women paid leave for the day in solidarity while others shut down entirely. According to the AP:
[The strike] is about "showing, socially... how valuable we women are, our contribution, and what would happen if one day we were not around. In all aspects: as homemakers, asworkers, as consumers," said Lluvia Flores Gomez, 40, who was sipping coffee and reading a book on the couch at home in the historic downtown instead of going to work.
Flores shuttered her bakery in observation of the strike, though she said her employees--all women--would be paid for the day. She said the business would take an economic hit, but it was important to call attention to all the ways women are under attack in Mexico--not only murder, disappearance, and rape, but also home and workplace discrimination and lack of equal opportunity.
"The point is for there to really be a loss, that is, for this day to happen without us. ...It had to be something like this, radical and cutting, so that the loss for everyone would be seen," she said, "or rather the absence, the lack of our presence."
Participants and supporters of the nationwide 24-hour work stoppage, also dubbed "A Day Without Women," posted updates on social media with the hashtags #UnDiaSinMujeres, #UnDiaSinNosotras, and #UnDiaSinEllas. They shared photos of closed shops and restaurants as well as empty desks and subway cars.
"Our government urgently needs to take action. We hope the strike opens their eyes," Marisela Villapando, who drives Uber part-time, told VICE. Villapando, who said she knows four women who were murdered or disappeared in the past year, added that "we live in fear."
Elsa Arista Gonzalez, a 40-year-old a law student and coffee shop employee, echoed that sentiment in comments to the Guardian.
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore," said Gonzalez. "We've become used to living in fear."
"We used to be able to walk home from school alone, and leave open the door to your house. Not anymore... We've become used to living in fear."
--Arista Gonzalez, law student and coffee shop employee
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on Monday delivered conflicting messages about the strike--both claiming that the government is working every day to address gender-based violence and also suggesting that some of the anger directed at his administration over the issue "is conservatism disguised as feminism."
"This movement has various aspects," AMLO, as the president is known, said during a morning news conference. "It's a movement of women who legitimately fight for their rights and against violence, against femicides. But there is another part that is against us, and what they want is for the government to fail."
AMLO's comments angered Mexican journalist Guadalupe Loaeza, according to the Washington Post.
"The president has been provoking us with his indifference, with his comments," Loaeza said. "He does not grasp that this is about feminism. He misrepresents it, distorts it by saying that it is conservatism."