A USDA inspector with pig carcasses. (Photo: Food & Water Watch)
Jan 12, 2020
A lawsuit filed Monday against President Donald Trump's loosening of regulations in pork inspection plants aims to stop the rules from taking effect to protect consumers from illness and death.
The suit, which targets Trump's New Swine Inspection System (NSIS), was filed by Food & Water Watch, the Center for Food Safety, and two supporting members.
"USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
--Ryan Talbott, Center for Food Safety
"There is no gray area here," said Food & Water Watch senior staff attorney Zach Corrigan in a statement. "The new rules curtail the ability of federal inspectors to detect serious food-safety problems and expose those who consume such pork products to serious health threats like salmonella."
According to a press release from the two groups, the new Department of Agriculture (USDA) rules are "a draconian reversal to the swine slaughter inspection system that has existed in the United States since 1906."
"We're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap," tweeted Food & Water Watch commmunications manager Jackie Filson.
\u201c\ud83d\udece\ufe0f bbrreaakkiinngg \ud83d\udece\ufe0fwe're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap\n\nthe New Swine Inspection System (NSIS) will mean pork eaters face higher threats of disease #foodsafety\n\n\ud83d\udc69\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\ud83e\udd53=\ud83e\udda0\ud83d\udc68\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\n\nhttps://t.co/OEzKIBlQZc\u201d— Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00 (@Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00) 1578946678
Under the new regulations put forth by the Trump administration, federal inspectors are no longer responsible for examining the animals before and after slaughter and will see a reduced role on the line.
According to Food & Water Watch:
The new rules prevent such inspection and hand over these responsibilities to the slaughter companies themselves. They also surrender federal control over removing contamination from carcasses to slaughter companies without any minimum training requirements for slaughter-plant employees.
"Reducing the number of trained federal inspectors and increasing line speeds is a recipe for disaster," Center for Food Safety staff attorney Ryan Talbott said in a statement.
"USDA has an obligation to protect the health and welfare of consumers," added Talbott. "USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A lawsuit filed Monday against President Donald Trump's loosening of regulations in pork inspection plants aims to stop the rules from taking effect to protect consumers from illness and death.
The suit, which targets Trump's New Swine Inspection System (NSIS), was filed by Food & Water Watch, the Center for Food Safety, and two supporting members.
"USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
--Ryan Talbott, Center for Food Safety
"There is no gray area here," said Food & Water Watch senior staff attorney Zach Corrigan in a statement. "The new rules curtail the ability of federal inspectors to detect serious food-safety problems and expose those who consume such pork products to serious health threats like salmonella."
According to a press release from the two groups, the new Department of Agriculture (USDA) rules are "a draconian reversal to the swine slaughter inspection system that has existed in the United States since 1906."
"We're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap," tweeted Food & Water Watch commmunications manager Jackie Filson.
\u201c\ud83d\udece\ufe0f bbrreaakkiinngg \ud83d\udece\ufe0fwe're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap\n\nthe New Swine Inspection System (NSIS) will mean pork eaters face higher threats of disease #foodsafety\n\n\ud83d\udc69\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\ud83e\udd53=\ud83e\udda0\ud83d\udc68\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\n\nhttps://t.co/OEzKIBlQZc\u201d— Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00 (@Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00) 1578946678
Under the new regulations put forth by the Trump administration, federal inspectors are no longer responsible for examining the animals before and after slaughter and will see a reduced role on the line.
According to Food & Water Watch:
The new rules prevent such inspection and hand over these responsibilities to the slaughter companies themselves. They also surrender federal control over removing contamination from carcasses to slaughter companies without any minimum training requirements for slaughter-plant employees.
"Reducing the number of trained federal inspectors and increasing line speeds is a recipe for disaster," Center for Food Safety staff attorney Ryan Talbott said in a statement.
"USDA has an obligation to protect the health and welfare of consumers," added Talbott. "USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
A lawsuit filed Monday against President Donald Trump's loosening of regulations in pork inspection plants aims to stop the rules from taking effect to protect consumers from illness and death.
The suit, which targets Trump's New Swine Inspection System (NSIS), was filed by Food & Water Watch, the Center for Food Safety, and two supporting members.
"USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
--Ryan Talbott, Center for Food Safety
"There is no gray area here," said Food & Water Watch senior staff attorney Zach Corrigan in a statement. "The new rules curtail the ability of federal inspectors to detect serious food-safety problems and expose those who consume such pork products to serious health threats like salmonella."
According to a press release from the two groups, the new Department of Agriculture (USDA) rules are "a draconian reversal to the swine slaughter inspection system that has existed in the United States since 1906."
"We're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap," tweeted Food & Water Watch commmunications manager Jackie Filson.
\u201c\ud83d\udece\ufe0f bbrreaakkiinngg \ud83d\udece\ufe0fwe're suing the crap out of USDA for... feeding us crap\n\nthe New Swine Inspection System (NSIS) will mean pork eaters face higher threats of disease #foodsafety\n\n\ud83d\udc69\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\ud83e\udd53=\ud83e\udda0\ud83d\udc68\u200d\u2696\ufe0f\n\nhttps://t.co/OEzKIBlQZc\u201d— Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00 (@Jackie Filson \ud83d\udc00) 1578946678
Under the new regulations put forth by the Trump administration, federal inspectors are no longer responsible for examining the animals before and after slaughter and will see a reduced role on the line.
According to Food & Water Watch:
The new rules prevent such inspection and hand over these responsibilities to the slaughter companies themselves. They also surrender federal control over removing contamination from carcasses to slaughter companies without any minimum training requirements for slaughter-plant employees.
"Reducing the number of trained federal inspectors and increasing line speeds is a recipe for disaster," Center for Food Safety staff attorney Ryan Talbott said in a statement.
"USDA has an obligation to protect the health and welfare of consumers," added Talbott. "USDA cannot do that when it takes a back seat and lets the slaughter plants largely regulate themselves."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.