A ruling in a court in Alaska Monday could open the door to imposing more restrictions on super PACs and possibly reversing the infamous 2012\u0026nbsp;Citizens United\u0026nbsp;by the U.S. Supreme Court that in 2012 upended the nation\u0026#039;s campaign finance laws.Anchorage Superior Court Judge William F. Morse ordered the state to impose limits on donations to political groups in Alaska, saying in the ruling (pdf) that the\u0026nbsp;Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC), which handles election enforcement, \u0022should reinstate enforcement of the contribution limits at issue.\u0022 The decision is expected to head to the Alaska Supreme Court.In a statement, election reform group Equal Citizens founder Lawrence Lessig said that the decision in favor of three Alaskan citizens contesting the unlimited donations was \u0022historic.\u0022\u0022This decision gives Alaskans and all Americans a chance to revisit those destructive decisions,\u0022 said Lessig, who helped develop the legal strategy for the case. \u0022And it will allow us to continue to make our case that the Framers did not wish to see super PACs. Just the opposite: they would have despised the kind of corruption we have seen recently, and the Constitution gives states the power to eliminate it.\u0022HUGE NEWS: We just notched a MAJOR victory in our lawsuit in Alaska challenging Super PACs!! The court ruled that Alaska \u0022should reinstate enforcement of the contribution limits.\u0022 Will likely head to the Alaska Supreme Court. https://t.co/uKM4V1RdWp pic.twitter.com/D0nGpcm3QG— Equal Citizens (@EqualCitizensUS) November 4, 2019Lessig framed the court\u0026#039;s decision as a confirmation that\u0026nbsp;Citizens United was just the ultimate symptom of a disease that began at the state and local level.\u0026nbsp;\u0022It shows what we have known for many years,\u0022 said Lessig. \u0022Citizens United did not create the super PAC; instead, unlimited donations have flown into independent groups because of incorrect interpretations by lower courts and state elections agencies.\u0022Equal Citizens\u0026nbsp;chief counsel Jason Harrow said that Morse\u0026#039;s ruling provides a pathway to the U.S. Supreme Court via appeals. That\u0026#039;s an opportunity, Harrow said, that his group has been waiting for.\u0026nbsp;\u0022The judge\u0026#039;s opinion said that \u0026#039;immediate review\u0026#039; by the Alaska Supreme Court is appropriate in a case of this magnitude,\u0022 said Harrow. \u0022We look forward to taking the case there and, hopefully, to the U.S. Supreme Court.\u0022Once the case reaches the high court, said Harrow, Equal Citizens believes that there\u0026#039;s a good chance at overturning\u0026nbsp;Citizens United.\u0026nbsp;\u0022We are confident we have a theory that the Constitution does not require the states to get out of the business of curbing unlimited donations to super PACs,\u0022 said Harrow.