In this photo illustration, a smartphone displays the Walmart Inc. market value on the stock exchange via the Yahoo Finance app. (Photo Illustration: Guillaume Payen/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Oct 17, 2019
The House Financial Services Committee on Thursday held a hearing about one of the main ways the one percent keeps money in the hands of the richest Americans--stock buybacks--winning praise from progressives for shining a light on the practice.
"It's time for Congress to listen to how our economy is rigged against working people," advocacy group United for Respect said in a tweet.
The hearing, chaired by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), featured testimony from Janie Grice, a Walmart worker and United for Respect member. Grice told lawmakers that she was upset to find out the company used $20 billion in profits for stock buybacks instead of giving that money to employees.
"I don't mind investors making profits," said Grice. "I do mind when associates like me, who have been putting the work in, day after day and year after year, don't get to share in those profits."
\u201cWalmart employees live in poverty while the Walton family is worth $175 billion.\n\nListen as Janie Grice, a cashier from South Carolina, testifies in Congress about the impact of stock buybacks on working people.\n\nAre you on the side of working people or billionaires?\u201d— United for Respect (@United for Respect) 1571329231
According to University of Massachusetts economics professor Lenore Palladino, stock buybacks represent yet another example of how inequality works in the U.S.
"Gains from share selling flow disproportionately to a small group of wealthy households," said Palladino.
\u201c.@RepMaloney asks about income and wealth inequality. So, who benefits from #buybacks? \n\n@lenorepalladino: The wealthy few.\u201d— Roosevelt Institute (@Roosevelt Institute) 1571333001
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) noted that stock buybacks can also be used to manipulate valuation for profit.
"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the company's stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices," said Maloney.
\u201c"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the companies stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices."\n\n@RepMaloney breaking down how CEO's use stock buybacks to enrich themselves at today's @FSCDems\n #stockbuybacks hearing.\u201d— Take On Wall St (@Take On Wall St) 1571337851
In a statement, Patriotic Millionaires chair Morris Pearl said the policy has negative long-term implications for companies and employees.
"The plain truth is that spending corporate profits on raising worker wages and investing in new jobs, instead of spending it on stock buybacks that only serve to make rich investors even richer, will actually help all of those business people and investors make more money simply because workers will have more money to spend," said Morris.
"Spending billions on stock buybacks, instead of reinvesting that money where it's needed most, is a shortsighted, unsustainable decision to enrich shareholders," Morris added.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The House Financial Services Committee on Thursday held a hearing about one of the main ways the one percent keeps money in the hands of the richest Americans--stock buybacks--winning praise from progressives for shining a light on the practice.
"It's time for Congress to listen to how our economy is rigged against working people," advocacy group United for Respect said in a tweet.
The hearing, chaired by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), featured testimony from Janie Grice, a Walmart worker and United for Respect member. Grice told lawmakers that she was upset to find out the company used $20 billion in profits for stock buybacks instead of giving that money to employees.
"I don't mind investors making profits," said Grice. "I do mind when associates like me, who have been putting the work in, day after day and year after year, don't get to share in those profits."
\u201cWalmart employees live in poverty while the Walton family is worth $175 billion.\n\nListen as Janie Grice, a cashier from South Carolina, testifies in Congress about the impact of stock buybacks on working people.\n\nAre you on the side of working people or billionaires?\u201d— United for Respect (@United for Respect) 1571329231
According to University of Massachusetts economics professor Lenore Palladino, stock buybacks represent yet another example of how inequality works in the U.S.
"Gains from share selling flow disproportionately to a small group of wealthy households," said Palladino.
\u201c.@RepMaloney asks about income and wealth inequality. So, who benefits from #buybacks? \n\n@lenorepalladino: The wealthy few.\u201d— Roosevelt Institute (@Roosevelt Institute) 1571333001
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) noted that stock buybacks can also be used to manipulate valuation for profit.
"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the company's stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices," said Maloney.
\u201c"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the companies stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices."\n\n@RepMaloney breaking down how CEO's use stock buybacks to enrich themselves at today's @FSCDems\n #stockbuybacks hearing.\u201d— Take On Wall St (@Take On Wall St) 1571337851
In a statement, Patriotic Millionaires chair Morris Pearl said the policy has negative long-term implications for companies and employees.
"The plain truth is that spending corporate profits on raising worker wages and investing in new jobs, instead of spending it on stock buybacks that only serve to make rich investors even richer, will actually help all of those business people and investors make more money simply because workers will have more money to spend," said Morris.
"Spending billions on stock buybacks, instead of reinvesting that money where it's needed most, is a shortsighted, unsustainable decision to enrich shareholders," Morris added.
The House Financial Services Committee on Thursday held a hearing about one of the main ways the one percent keeps money in the hands of the richest Americans--stock buybacks--winning praise from progressives for shining a light on the practice.
"It's time for Congress to listen to how our economy is rigged against working people," advocacy group United for Respect said in a tweet.
The hearing, chaired by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), featured testimony from Janie Grice, a Walmart worker and United for Respect member. Grice told lawmakers that she was upset to find out the company used $20 billion in profits for stock buybacks instead of giving that money to employees.
"I don't mind investors making profits," said Grice. "I do mind when associates like me, who have been putting the work in, day after day and year after year, don't get to share in those profits."
\u201cWalmart employees live in poverty while the Walton family is worth $175 billion.\n\nListen as Janie Grice, a cashier from South Carolina, testifies in Congress about the impact of stock buybacks on working people.\n\nAre you on the side of working people or billionaires?\u201d— United for Respect (@United for Respect) 1571329231
According to University of Massachusetts economics professor Lenore Palladino, stock buybacks represent yet another example of how inequality works in the U.S.
"Gains from share selling flow disproportionately to a small group of wealthy households," said Palladino.
\u201c.@RepMaloney asks about income and wealth inequality. So, who benefits from #buybacks? \n\n@lenorepalladino: The wealthy few.\u201d— Roosevelt Institute (@Roosevelt Institute) 1571333001
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) noted that stock buybacks can also be used to manipulate valuation for profit.
"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the company's stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices," said Maloney.
\u201c"Executives can use a buyback program to boost the companies stock price, right before selling their own stock at these artificially inflated prices."\n\n@RepMaloney breaking down how CEO's use stock buybacks to enrich themselves at today's @FSCDems\n #stockbuybacks hearing.\u201d— Take On Wall St (@Take On Wall St) 1571337851
In a statement, Patriotic Millionaires chair Morris Pearl said the policy has negative long-term implications for companies and employees.
"The plain truth is that spending corporate profits on raising worker wages and investing in new jobs, instead of spending it on stock buybacks that only serve to make rich investors even richer, will actually help all of those business people and investors make more money simply because workers will have more money to spend," said Morris.
"Spending billions on stock buybacks, instead of reinvesting that money where it's needed most, is a shortsighted, unsustainable decision to enrich shareholders," Morris added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.