President Donald Trump speaks during an executive order signing regarding federal regulations in the Roosevelt Room of the White House October 9, 2019, in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)
Oct 10, 2019
In remarks that sparked outrage and left some critics at a loss for words, President Donald Trump on Wednesday attempted to justify his decision to abandon Kurdish forces in Syria by criticizing Kurds for not assisting the United States in World War II.
"As somebody wrote in a very powerful article today, they didn't help us in the Second World War, they didn't help us with Normandy, as an example," Trump said during a signing ceremony for unrelated executive orders. "They're there to help us with their land, and that's a different thing."
As The DailyBeast's Will Sommer pointed out, Trump's remarks appear to have been inspired by a Tuesday article written by right-wing columnist Kurt Schlichter.
British historian Akil N. Awan was quick to point out on Twitter that Kurds "DID fight on the Allied side in WW2."
"They helped break the siege following the 1941 pro-Nazi coup d'etat in Iraq and were part of the (pro-Allied) Iraq Levies," said Awan. "By 1942 Kurds made up 25% of the force. By 1943, 10 of the 44 companies comprising the Iraq Levies were Kurdish."
In addition to condemning the president's historical ignorance, critics also slammed Trump's comments as unspeakably cruel:
\u201cok\u2026. All else aside, this logic makes no sense, and doesn\u2019t dictate anything in American foreign policy. The Viet Minh helped us a lot in World War II, and wonder how that alliance turned out in the years directly after.\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1570654868
\u201cTrump to the Kurds: Drop dead, because you didn't help us with Normandy. Yes, really. This is real life.\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1570654852
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In remarks that sparked outrage and left some critics at a loss for words, President Donald Trump on Wednesday attempted to justify his decision to abandon Kurdish forces in Syria by criticizing Kurds for not assisting the United States in World War II.
"As somebody wrote in a very powerful article today, they didn't help us in the Second World War, they didn't help us with Normandy, as an example," Trump said during a signing ceremony for unrelated executive orders. "They're there to help us with their land, and that's a different thing."
As The DailyBeast's Will Sommer pointed out, Trump's remarks appear to have been inspired by a Tuesday article written by right-wing columnist Kurt Schlichter.
British historian Akil N. Awan was quick to point out on Twitter that Kurds "DID fight on the Allied side in WW2."
"They helped break the siege following the 1941 pro-Nazi coup d'etat in Iraq and were part of the (pro-Allied) Iraq Levies," said Awan. "By 1942 Kurds made up 25% of the force. By 1943, 10 of the 44 companies comprising the Iraq Levies were Kurdish."
In addition to condemning the president's historical ignorance, critics also slammed Trump's comments as unspeakably cruel:
\u201cok\u2026. All else aside, this logic makes no sense, and doesn\u2019t dictate anything in American foreign policy. The Viet Minh helped us a lot in World War II, and wonder how that alliance turned out in the years directly after.\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1570654868
\u201cTrump to the Kurds: Drop dead, because you didn't help us with Normandy. Yes, really. This is real life.\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1570654852
In remarks that sparked outrage and left some critics at a loss for words, President Donald Trump on Wednesday attempted to justify his decision to abandon Kurdish forces in Syria by criticizing Kurds for not assisting the United States in World War II.
"As somebody wrote in a very powerful article today, they didn't help us in the Second World War, they didn't help us with Normandy, as an example," Trump said during a signing ceremony for unrelated executive orders. "They're there to help us with their land, and that's a different thing."
As The DailyBeast's Will Sommer pointed out, Trump's remarks appear to have been inspired by a Tuesday article written by right-wing columnist Kurt Schlichter.
British historian Akil N. Awan was quick to point out on Twitter that Kurds "DID fight on the Allied side in WW2."
"They helped break the siege following the 1941 pro-Nazi coup d'etat in Iraq and were part of the (pro-Allied) Iraq Levies," said Awan. "By 1942 Kurds made up 25% of the force. By 1943, 10 of the 44 companies comprising the Iraq Levies were Kurdish."
In addition to condemning the president's historical ignorance, critics also slammed Trump's comments as unspeakably cruel:
\u201cok\u2026. All else aside, this logic makes no sense, and doesn\u2019t dictate anything in American foreign policy. The Viet Minh helped us a lot in World War II, and wonder how that alliance turned out in the years directly after.\u201d— Asawin Suebsaeng (@Asawin Suebsaeng) 1570654868
\u201cTrump to the Kurds: Drop dead, because you didn't help us with Normandy. Yes, really. This is real life.\u201d— Steve Silberman (@Steve Silberman) 1570654852
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.