Supertanker Grace 1 off the coast of Gibraltar on July 6, 2019. (Photo: Jorge Guerrero/AFP/Getty Images)
'This Is a Dangerous Game': Iran Tells US and UK to Leave Gulf Region Immediately as Tensions Soar
With control of world's oil supplies still dominant U.S. goal, the Iranian government claims U.K. attempting to provoke conflict with illegal tanker seizure and false accusations
As tensions in the Persian Gulf continue to escalate after British forces seized an Iranian oil tanker last week, Iran on Friday called on the U.K. to release the vessel and demanded that Western powers get out of the region immediately.
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences. The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
--Abbas Mousavi, Iranian Foreign Ministry
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences," said Abbas Mousavi, spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry. "The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
Mousavi went on to urge foreign powers to "leave the region" to avert a full-blown conflict.
"Iran and other regional countries are capable of securing the regional security," Mousavi said. "Iran has repeatedly expressed its readiness to hold talks with its neighbors to resolve disputes."
Mousavi's comments came just 24 hours after the U.K. accused Iran of attempting to block the passage of a British tanker in the Persian Gulf.
British authorities said a U.K. warship trained its deck guns on three Iranian boats and forced them to retreat.
The Iranian government denied that it attempted to impede the British tanker.
"They make such claims to create tension, yet these claims are worthless and they have made many such claims," Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told reporters on Thursday. "They say such things to cover up their own weaknesses."
Iran's demand that all foreign powers leave the region comes as the Trump administration is reportedly attempting to form a "military coalition" to patrol waters off Iran and Yemen with the goal of protecting "commercial shipping."
Michael Klare, senior visiting fellow at the Arms Control Association, wrote for TomDispatch on Thursday that a single principle has long guided U.S. policy in the Middle East, one that is not often "openly acknowledged."
"Any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
--Michael Klare, Arms Control Association
"The United States alone must be the ultimate guarantor of unimpeded oil commerce in the Persian Gulf," Klare wrote. "Look closely and you can find this principle lurking in every fundamental statement of U.S. policy related to that region and among the Washington elite more generally."
Klare went on to note that "any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
As Common Dreams reported last month, the Trump administration--on the basis of flimsy evidence--blamed Iran for two attacks on commercial tankers in the Gulf of Oman.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the attacks "a blatant assault on the freedom of navigation."
Klare argued that if the U.S. ultimately decides to go to war with Iran, "you are unlikely to hear the word 'oil' uttered by top Trump administration officials, but make no mistake: that three-letter word lies at the root of the present crisis, not to speak of the world's long-term fate."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As tensions in the Persian Gulf continue to escalate after British forces seized an Iranian oil tanker last week, Iran on Friday called on the U.K. to release the vessel and demanded that Western powers get out of the region immediately.
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences. The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
--Abbas Mousavi, Iranian Foreign Ministry
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences," said Abbas Mousavi, spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry. "The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
Mousavi went on to urge foreign powers to "leave the region" to avert a full-blown conflict.
"Iran and other regional countries are capable of securing the regional security," Mousavi said. "Iran has repeatedly expressed its readiness to hold talks with its neighbors to resolve disputes."
Mousavi's comments came just 24 hours after the U.K. accused Iran of attempting to block the passage of a British tanker in the Persian Gulf.
British authorities said a U.K. warship trained its deck guns on three Iranian boats and forced them to retreat.
The Iranian government denied that it attempted to impede the British tanker.
"They make such claims to create tension, yet these claims are worthless and they have made many such claims," Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told reporters on Thursday. "They say such things to cover up their own weaknesses."
Iran's demand that all foreign powers leave the region comes as the Trump administration is reportedly attempting to form a "military coalition" to patrol waters off Iran and Yemen with the goal of protecting "commercial shipping."
Michael Klare, senior visiting fellow at the Arms Control Association, wrote for TomDispatch on Thursday that a single principle has long guided U.S. policy in the Middle East, one that is not often "openly acknowledged."
"Any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
--Michael Klare, Arms Control Association
"The United States alone must be the ultimate guarantor of unimpeded oil commerce in the Persian Gulf," Klare wrote. "Look closely and you can find this principle lurking in every fundamental statement of U.S. policy related to that region and among the Washington elite more generally."
Klare went on to note that "any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
As Common Dreams reported last month, the Trump administration--on the basis of flimsy evidence--blamed Iran for two attacks on commercial tankers in the Gulf of Oman.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the attacks "a blatant assault on the freedom of navigation."
Klare argued that if the U.S. ultimately decides to go to war with Iran, "you are unlikely to hear the word 'oil' uttered by top Trump administration officials, but make no mistake: that three-letter word lies at the root of the present crisis, not to speak of the world's long-term fate."
As tensions in the Persian Gulf continue to escalate after British forces seized an Iranian oil tanker last week, Iran on Friday called on the U.K. to release the vessel and demanded that Western powers get out of the region immediately.
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences. The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
--Abbas Mousavi, Iranian Foreign Ministry
"This is a dangerous game and has consequences," said Abbas Mousavi, spokesman for the Iranian Foreign Ministry. "The legal pretexts for the capture are not valid... The release of the tanker is in all countries' interests."
Mousavi went on to urge foreign powers to "leave the region" to avert a full-blown conflict.
"Iran and other regional countries are capable of securing the regional security," Mousavi said. "Iran has repeatedly expressed its readiness to hold talks with its neighbors to resolve disputes."
Mousavi's comments came just 24 hours after the U.K. accused Iran of attempting to block the passage of a British tanker in the Persian Gulf.
British authorities said a U.K. warship trained its deck guns on three Iranian boats and forced them to retreat.
The Iranian government denied that it attempted to impede the British tanker.
"They make such claims to create tension, yet these claims are worthless and they have made many such claims," Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told reporters on Thursday. "They say such things to cover up their own weaknesses."
Iran's demand that all foreign powers leave the region comes as the Trump administration is reportedly attempting to form a "military coalition" to patrol waters off Iran and Yemen with the goal of protecting "commercial shipping."
Michael Klare, senior visiting fellow at the Arms Control Association, wrote for TomDispatch on Thursday that a single principle has long guided U.S. policy in the Middle East, one that is not often "openly acknowledged."
"Any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
--Michael Klare, Arms Control Association
"The United States alone must be the ultimate guarantor of unimpeded oil commerce in the Persian Gulf," Klare wrote. "Look closely and you can find this principle lurking in every fundamental statement of U.S. policy related to that region and among the Washington elite more generally."
Klare went on to note that "any Iranian move in the Strait of Hormuz that can be portrayed as a threat to the 'free flow of commerce' (that is, the oil trade) represents the most likely trigger for direct U.S. military action."
As Common Dreams reported last month, the Trump administration--on the basis of flimsy evidence--blamed Iran for two attacks on commercial tankers in the Gulf of Oman.
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the attacks "a blatant assault on the freedom of navigation."
Klare argued that if the U.S. ultimately decides to go to war with Iran, "you are unlikely to hear the word 'oil' uttered by top Trump administration officials, but make no mistake: that three-letter word lies at the root of the present crisis, not to speak of the world's long-term fate."