The youth-led Sunrise Movement has staged a series of protests on Capitol Hill and across the country to demand lawmakers take urgent action on the climate crisis and back the Green New Deal resolution currently before Congress. (Photo: Sunrise Movement/Twitter)
Right-Wing State Legislators Working to Destroy Climate and Science Education, Analysis Warns
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness."
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."