SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The youth-led Sunrise Movement has staged a series of protests on Capitol Hill and across the country to demand lawmakers take urgent action on the climate crisis and back the Green New Deal resolution currently before Congress. (Photo: Sunrise Movement/Twitter)
Right-Wing State Legislators Working to Destroy Climate and Science Education, Analysis Warns
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness."
Mar 11, 2019
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."
A new analysis warns that right-wing lawmakers across the United States are working to water down science education, as students around the world hold weekly school strikes, calling on adults take action to address the human-made climate crisis.
"The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education."
--Glenn Branch, NCSE
The Washington Post--citing the National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which tracks anti-science legislation--reported Monday that state legislators already have introduced more than a dozen measures targeting science education in 2019. That's more in less than three months than NCSE typically expects for an entire year.
Detailing some of the proposals, the Post reported:
A state lawmaker in Connecticut, for example, has proposed prohibiting the use of the Next Generation Science Standards, which were developed by states to improve science education and have been adopted by 19 states and the District of Columbia. A similar proposal was introduced in Iowa.
State Rep. John Piscopo (R-Conn.) introduced one bill to eliminate the section on climate change from the standards and another to prohibit schools from using the standards at all.
...In Florida, GOP state Sen. Dennis Baxley wants to pass a bill requiring schools to teach "controversial theories and concepts" in science standards in a "factual, objective, and balanced manner."
...Two other bills in Florida, for example, would require instructional materials in public schools to "provide objective, balanced, and noninflammatory viewpoints on controversial issues."
While some bills already have failed, NCSE deputy director Glenn Branch emphasized that it is still important to make people aware of efforts to weaken science education--especially with respect to legislation that doesn't specifically mention climate or science more broadly, but would ultimately impact what is allowed in the classroom.
"They're not aware there's a sizable constituency that likes to see these bills introduced and hopes they will be passed," Branch told the Post. "The only way to be sure they don't pass is to raise public awareness of them and to localize concerns about the integrity of public science education by speaking about them."
Last month, Branch published a blog post on NCSE's website outlining 14 anti-science measures introduced this year. The list includes bills in Indiana and South Carolina that would allow school districts to teach creationism as well as so-called "anti-indoctrination" legislation in Arizona, Maine, South Dakota, and Virginia.
Anti-indoctrination measures, as Branch explained,
would require (or, in the case of resolutions, encourage) the adoption of codes of ethics for K-12 teachers, purportedly to prevent them from engaging in "political or ideological indoctrination." These codes would prohibit teachers from advocating for any side of a "controversial" issue, where controversial issues are those addressed as part of a political party's platform. As it happens, climate change and evolution are mentioned in the platform of a handful of state political parties, even though they are anything but scientifically controversial, so science education would be affected.
Amid the wave of attacks on science education, some state lawmakers, such as Washington state Sen. Claire Wilson (D), are fighting back with measures designed to enhance science education. In January, Wilson introduced a bill (pdf) that aims to "increase learning opportunities and improve educational outcomes in climate science literacy."
"We know there's a growing crisis called climate change," Wilson told the Post, "and we believe it's underrecognized by many people... We cannot crack this nut and deal with it until we believe it's true and we start teaching young people about it and have them help us come up with the solution."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.