To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Jared Kushner, senior advisor to President Donald J. Trump, sits in on a meeting with Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at the Ministry of Defense in Baghdad, Iraq, April 3, 2017. (Photo: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Dominique A. Pineiro, via Flickr @thejointstaff).
The fallout from a Thursday revelation in The New York Times that President Donald Trump personally intervened to give his son-in-law Jared Kushner a security clearance has some calling for Kushner to be fired.
"Jared Kushner was identified as a national security risk and deemed unworthy of receiving top-secret security clearance yet President Trump insisted that his son-in-law be given the clearance," said Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "If the President will go so far as to ignore accepted norms and put the security of our nation at risk then Congress must pass legislation to check presidential discretion on security clearances."
The #FireKushner hashtag was trending on Twitter Friday morning as a number of commentators called for Kushner--a White House senior advisor--to either resign voluntarily or be removed from his position.
#FireKushner .... why aren't we asking to #FireIvanka too? Both need to lose their security clearances immediately and be removed from access to our government.
-- Kristin (@enzerukristin) March 1, 2019
\u201cTrump overruled even the CIA to grant Jared Kushner security clearance! NYT notes: "An internal memo outlining the concerns that had been raised about Mr. Kushner -including by the C.I.A.-and how Mr. McGahn had recommended that he not be given a top-secret clearance" #FireKushner\u201d— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@(((DeanObeidallah)))) 1551444410
\u201cTrump\u2019s not going to #FireKushner. Have we learned nothing about who this corrupted shell of a human is that praises murderers? We think he\u2019s actually bothered by ethical or even legal standards?\u201d— Jeffrey Wright (@Jeffrey Wright) 1551444097
Reporters chimed in on social media, explaining how Kushner's history of problematic issues with clearance might contribute to the storm of scandals around the president and the White House.
\u201cWH chief of staff, John Kelly, wrote an internal memo about how he had been \u201cORDERED\u201d by Trump to give Kushner the top-secret clearance, thus overruling WH counsel concerns.\nPOTUS & Ivanka caught LYING over Kushner security clearance approval.\n\nConflict of Interest crisis point!\u201d— Rula Jebreal (@Rula Jebreal) 1551398352
\u201cTo remind: Here's why Jared Kushner was never supposed to get a clearance\n\n"Officials in at least 4 countries privately discussed ways they can manipulate Jared Kushner..using his financial difficulties and lack of experience."\nMe W @shaneharris @jdawsey1 https://t.co/cejnYVT4qm\u201d— Carol Leonnig (@Carol Leonnig) 1551414661
\u201cAnd lest we forget: "The president probably could not receive a security clearance if he was not the president."\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1551392882
Despite the growing chorus of anger over Kushner's position of power within the White House, it's unlikely that the president will remove his son-in-law from the administration. Kushner has proven resilient in the face of two years of sustained criticism over his role in the West Wing and the president's reported intervention on his behalf does not indicate a willingness from Trump to discard his son-in-law.
Still, Kushner's level of clearance has been a source of contention in the White House since Trump took office--and, as the Times reports, the concern over Kushner's access to secret materials is longstanding on the part of intelligence services.
The full scope of intelligence officials' concerns about Mr. Kushner is not known. But the clearance had been held up in part over questions from the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. about his foreign and business contacts, including those related to Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the events.
The Times also reported that Trump's decision was opposed by both White House Counsel Don McGann and then-Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Congressional Democrats expressed outrage over the president's unilateral decision to grant Kushner security clearance and said they'd hold hearings to find out more about the president's decision making process.
\u201c**Intel Chairman @RepAdamSchiff & I just issued following statement re: #Kushner security clearance. \u201cSecurity clearances should be issued based on trust, not by blood or bond.\u201d\u201d— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@Rep. Eric Swalwell) 1551402625
\u201cApparently John Kelly & Don McGhan were so disturbed by @realDonaldTrump ordering that Mr. Kushner be granted a security clearance that both wrote CYA memos.\n\nHere is my statement, with a message to the national security community. https://t.co/uemXhT2Rue\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1551398735
It's unclear what, if anything, can be done about Kushner's clearance--but one thing's for sure: there's no sign of the scandals surrounding the administration going away any time soon.
\u201cEvery time I talk myself into believing this is mainly a Paul Manafort story, Jared Kushner wanders back into the frame.\u201d— southpaw (@southpaw) 1551418530
This article was updated with comment from Common Cause.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
The fallout from a Thursday revelation in The New York Times that President Donald Trump personally intervened to give his son-in-law Jared Kushner a security clearance has some calling for Kushner to be fired.
"Jared Kushner was identified as a national security risk and deemed unworthy of receiving top-secret security clearance yet President Trump insisted that his son-in-law be given the clearance," said Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "If the President will go so far as to ignore accepted norms and put the security of our nation at risk then Congress must pass legislation to check presidential discretion on security clearances."
The #FireKushner hashtag was trending on Twitter Friday morning as a number of commentators called for Kushner--a White House senior advisor--to either resign voluntarily or be removed from his position.
#FireKushner .... why aren't we asking to #FireIvanka too? Both need to lose their security clearances immediately and be removed from access to our government.
-- Kristin (@enzerukristin) March 1, 2019
\u201cTrump overruled even the CIA to grant Jared Kushner security clearance! NYT notes: "An internal memo outlining the concerns that had been raised about Mr. Kushner -including by the C.I.A.-and how Mr. McGahn had recommended that he not be given a top-secret clearance" #FireKushner\u201d— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@(((DeanObeidallah)))) 1551444410
\u201cTrump\u2019s not going to #FireKushner. Have we learned nothing about who this corrupted shell of a human is that praises murderers? We think he\u2019s actually bothered by ethical or even legal standards?\u201d— Jeffrey Wright (@Jeffrey Wright) 1551444097
Reporters chimed in on social media, explaining how Kushner's history of problematic issues with clearance might contribute to the storm of scandals around the president and the White House.
\u201cWH chief of staff, John Kelly, wrote an internal memo about how he had been \u201cORDERED\u201d by Trump to give Kushner the top-secret clearance, thus overruling WH counsel concerns.\nPOTUS & Ivanka caught LYING over Kushner security clearance approval.\n\nConflict of Interest crisis point!\u201d— Rula Jebreal (@Rula Jebreal) 1551398352
\u201cTo remind: Here's why Jared Kushner was never supposed to get a clearance\n\n"Officials in at least 4 countries privately discussed ways they can manipulate Jared Kushner..using his financial difficulties and lack of experience."\nMe W @shaneharris @jdawsey1 https://t.co/cejnYVT4qm\u201d— Carol Leonnig (@Carol Leonnig) 1551414661
\u201cAnd lest we forget: "The president probably could not receive a security clearance if he was not the president."\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1551392882
Despite the growing chorus of anger over Kushner's position of power within the White House, it's unlikely that the president will remove his son-in-law from the administration. Kushner has proven resilient in the face of two years of sustained criticism over his role in the West Wing and the president's reported intervention on his behalf does not indicate a willingness from Trump to discard his son-in-law.
Still, Kushner's level of clearance has been a source of contention in the White House since Trump took office--and, as the Times reports, the concern over Kushner's access to secret materials is longstanding on the part of intelligence services.
The full scope of intelligence officials' concerns about Mr. Kushner is not known. But the clearance had been held up in part over questions from the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. about his foreign and business contacts, including those related to Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the events.
The Times also reported that Trump's decision was opposed by both White House Counsel Don McGann and then-Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Congressional Democrats expressed outrage over the president's unilateral decision to grant Kushner security clearance and said they'd hold hearings to find out more about the president's decision making process.
\u201c**Intel Chairman @RepAdamSchiff & I just issued following statement re: #Kushner security clearance. \u201cSecurity clearances should be issued based on trust, not by blood or bond.\u201d\u201d— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@Rep. Eric Swalwell) 1551402625
\u201cApparently John Kelly & Don McGhan were so disturbed by @realDonaldTrump ordering that Mr. Kushner be granted a security clearance that both wrote CYA memos.\n\nHere is my statement, with a message to the national security community. https://t.co/uemXhT2Rue\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1551398735
It's unclear what, if anything, can be done about Kushner's clearance--but one thing's for sure: there's no sign of the scandals surrounding the administration going away any time soon.
\u201cEvery time I talk myself into believing this is mainly a Paul Manafort story, Jared Kushner wanders back into the frame.\u201d— southpaw (@southpaw) 1551418530
This article was updated with comment from Common Cause.
The fallout from a Thursday revelation in The New York Times that President Donald Trump personally intervened to give his son-in-law Jared Kushner a security clearance has some calling for Kushner to be fired.
"Jared Kushner was identified as a national security risk and deemed unworthy of receiving top-secret security clearance yet President Trump insisted that his son-in-law be given the clearance," said Common Cause president Karen Hobert Flynn. "If the President will go so far as to ignore accepted norms and put the security of our nation at risk then Congress must pass legislation to check presidential discretion on security clearances."
The #FireKushner hashtag was trending on Twitter Friday morning as a number of commentators called for Kushner--a White House senior advisor--to either resign voluntarily or be removed from his position.
#FireKushner .... why aren't we asking to #FireIvanka too? Both need to lose their security clearances immediately and be removed from access to our government.
-- Kristin (@enzerukristin) March 1, 2019
\u201cTrump overruled even the CIA to grant Jared Kushner security clearance! NYT notes: "An internal memo outlining the concerns that had been raised about Mr. Kushner -including by the C.I.A.-and how Mr. McGahn had recommended that he not be given a top-secret clearance" #FireKushner\u201d— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@(((DeanObeidallah)))) 1551444410
\u201cTrump\u2019s not going to #FireKushner. Have we learned nothing about who this corrupted shell of a human is that praises murderers? We think he\u2019s actually bothered by ethical or even legal standards?\u201d— Jeffrey Wright (@Jeffrey Wright) 1551444097
Reporters chimed in on social media, explaining how Kushner's history of problematic issues with clearance might contribute to the storm of scandals around the president and the White House.
\u201cWH chief of staff, John Kelly, wrote an internal memo about how he had been \u201cORDERED\u201d by Trump to give Kushner the top-secret clearance, thus overruling WH counsel concerns.\nPOTUS & Ivanka caught LYING over Kushner security clearance approval.\n\nConflict of Interest crisis point!\u201d— Rula Jebreal (@Rula Jebreal) 1551398352
\u201cTo remind: Here's why Jared Kushner was never supposed to get a clearance\n\n"Officials in at least 4 countries privately discussed ways they can manipulate Jared Kushner..using his financial difficulties and lack of experience."\nMe W @shaneharris @jdawsey1 https://t.co/cejnYVT4qm\u201d— Carol Leonnig (@Carol Leonnig) 1551414661
\u201cAnd lest we forget: "The president probably could not receive a security clearance if he was not the president."\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1551392882
Despite the growing chorus of anger over Kushner's position of power within the White House, it's unlikely that the president will remove his son-in-law from the administration. Kushner has proven resilient in the face of two years of sustained criticism over his role in the West Wing and the president's reported intervention on his behalf does not indicate a willingness from Trump to discard his son-in-law.
Still, Kushner's level of clearance has been a source of contention in the White House since Trump took office--and, as the Times reports, the concern over Kushner's access to secret materials is longstanding on the part of intelligence services.
The full scope of intelligence officials' concerns about Mr. Kushner is not known. But the clearance had been held up in part over questions from the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. about his foreign and business contacts, including those related to Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Russia, according to multiple people familiar with the events.
The Times also reported that Trump's decision was opposed by both White House Counsel Don McGann and then-Chief of Staff John Kelly.
Congressional Democrats expressed outrage over the president's unilateral decision to grant Kushner security clearance and said they'd hold hearings to find out more about the president's decision making process.
\u201c**Intel Chairman @RepAdamSchiff & I just issued following statement re: #Kushner security clearance. \u201cSecurity clearances should be issued based on trust, not by blood or bond.\u201d\u201d— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@Rep. Eric Swalwell) 1551402625
\u201cApparently John Kelly & Don McGhan were so disturbed by @realDonaldTrump ordering that Mr. Kushner be granted a security clearance that both wrote CYA memos.\n\nHere is my statement, with a message to the national security community. https://t.co/uemXhT2Rue\u201d— Ted Lieu (@Ted Lieu) 1551398735
It's unclear what, if anything, can be done about Kushner's clearance--but one thing's for sure: there's no sign of the scandals surrounding the administration going away any time soon.
\u201cEvery time I talk myself into believing this is mainly a Paul Manafort story, Jared Kushner wanders back into the frame.\u201d— southpaw (@southpaw) 1551418530
This article was updated with comment from Common Cause.
