To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
President Donald Trump listens to Seema Verma, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service, during a Women in Healthcare panel in the Roosevelt Room at the White House March 22, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Following reporting that the Trump administration is planning an attack on Medicaid by seeking key changes in how the program is financed--changes it wants to make without Congressional approval--Democratic lawmakers and healthcare advocates are warning the proposal means healthcare for millions of Americans will be threatened as states will be forced to "make draconian cuts."
The plan, Politico reported Friday citing "three administration sources," would involve states being able to opt for block grants instead of receiving open ended funding as they do now, for supposedly "more flexibility to run the low-income health program that serves nearly 75 million Americans, from poor children, to disabled people, to impoverished seniors in nursing homes."
As for that touted "flexibility," Hannah Katch, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, previously laid out in a blog post:
states already enjoy expansive flexibility under Medicaid, which they're using to streamline healthcare delivery and improve health. A block grant would likely sharply cut federal funding over time and shift large costs to states, eliminating states' ability to invest in innovative reforms. It would only give states the flexibility to make draconian cuts, leaving many beneficiaries uninsured or without access to needed healthcare.
Moreover, as Kelly Allen of the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy explained in a tweet, "Entitlement programs like SNAP and Medicaid see increased need when the economy worsens or during natural disasters. But with a block grant--sorry--it's a fixed pie and when the money is gone, it's gone." Look also to what happened in 2014 with regards to prescription drug spending to see the impact of block grants, said Edwin Park of Georgetown University Health Policy Institute' Center for Children & Families:
\u201cHere's real-life example of states facing higher-than-expected #Medicaid costs. New Hep C treatment drugs in 2014 caused big spike in Rx spending. Unlike current law where federal $ automatically increases in response, no additional $ under block grant/cap.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1547481343
The Kaiser Family Foundation offered this info graphic to contrast the funding as it currently is with how it would be with block grants:
\u201cBlock grants or per capita caps could limit federal financing for #Medicaid. This brief outlines five key questions to consider, as well as the potential implications, as the debate on these policies moves forward. https://t.co/XgIRmqt1yy\u201d— KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) (@KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation)) 1547395322
Politico added:
the administration has been deliberating and refining the plan for weeks, hoping to advance an idea that Republicans since the Reagan era have unsuccessfully championed in Congress against stiff opposition from Democrats and patient advocates. During the Obamacare repeal debate in 2017, Republican proposals to cap and shrink federal Medicaid spending helped galvanize public opposition, with projections showing millions would be forced off coverage.
[...] [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema] Verma has been trying to insert block grant language into federal guidance for months but has encountered heave scrutiny from agency lawyers, two CMS staffers said. She mentioned interest in using her agency's authority to pursue block grants during a meeting with state Medicaid directors in the fall but did not provide details, said two individuals who attended.
With the reported push, Park added, the administration "is again ignoring lessons of 2017 repeal/cap fight & 2018 midterms. Medicaid is very popular (74% favorable opinion) & block grants are definitely not (71% oppose)."
Offering an 18-point Twitter thread to expose the dangers of proposal, Rebecca Vallas, who serves as vice president for the Center for American Progress's Poverty to Prosperity Program, asserted, "Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect."
\u201c4. By shifting costs to states in a huge way, block-granting Medicaid will force them to make dramatic cuts to their Medicaid programs. (Read: kick huge numbers of people off of health insurance.)\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@urbaninstitute 6. One of the groups who\u2019d be hurt the most: people with disabilities. This is because for many people with disabilities & severe health conditions, Medicaid provides a lot more than just health insurance\u2014it enables independent living.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@rwest817 @kfgrobbins 9. Worth noting: even people who aren\u2019t kicked off Medicaid would be hurt, as we\u2019d also see states cook up new ways to deny beneficiaries the medicines, procedures, tests & other critical services they need, in order to further reduce costs.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c14. Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect.\n\nFor context: the Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 208,000 \u201cunnecessary deaths\u201d would occur by 2026 if the Senate GOP health care repeal plan had taken effect. https://t.co/dWMAPGmcvO\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324969
She also included in the thread that among those who would be most hurt are people with disabilities; that it could take away Medicaid from between 14 and 21 million Americans; that even those not kicked off the program would still be hurt; and that the administration is setting itself up for legal action.
That last point was noted in a tweet by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid:
\u201cCMS doesn\u2019t have the legal authority to block grant Medicaid. Block grants undermine the protections of the Medicaid program and put our most vulnerable citizens at risk.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1547246639
Another lawmaker chiming in was Senate Finance Committee member Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who offered a blunt "Hell no" to the plan.
"If the Administration tries to decimate Medicaid through executive action after its scheme was rejected by Congress and the American people, I will fight it with everything I have," he tweeted.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Following reporting that the Trump administration is planning an attack on Medicaid by seeking key changes in how the program is financed--changes it wants to make without Congressional approval--Democratic lawmakers and healthcare advocates are warning the proposal means healthcare for millions of Americans will be threatened as states will be forced to "make draconian cuts."
The plan, Politico reported Friday citing "three administration sources," would involve states being able to opt for block grants instead of receiving open ended funding as they do now, for supposedly "more flexibility to run the low-income health program that serves nearly 75 million Americans, from poor children, to disabled people, to impoverished seniors in nursing homes."
As for that touted "flexibility," Hannah Katch, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, previously laid out in a blog post:
states already enjoy expansive flexibility under Medicaid, which they're using to streamline healthcare delivery and improve health. A block grant would likely sharply cut federal funding over time and shift large costs to states, eliminating states' ability to invest in innovative reforms. It would only give states the flexibility to make draconian cuts, leaving many beneficiaries uninsured or without access to needed healthcare.
Moreover, as Kelly Allen of the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy explained in a tweet, "Entitlement programs like SNAP and Medicaid see increased need when the economy worsens or during natural disasters. But with a block grant--sorry--it's a fixed pie and when the money is gone, it's gone." Look also to what happened in 2014 with regards to prescription drug spending to see the impact of block grants, said Edwin Park of Georgetown University Health Policy Institute' Center for Children & Families:
\u201cHere's real-life example of states facing higher-than-expected #Medicaid costs. New Hep C treatment drugs in 2014 caused big spike in Rx spending. Unlike current law where federal $ automatically increases in response, no additional $ under block grant/cap.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1547481343
The Kaiser Family Foundation offered this info graphic to contrast the funding as it currently is with how it would be with block grants:
\u201cBlock grants or per capita caps could limit federal financing for #Medicaid. This brief outlines five key questions to consider, as well as the potential implications, as the debate on these policies moves forward. https://t.co/XgIRmqt1yy\u201d— KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) (@KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation)) 1547395322
Politico added:
the administration has been deliberating and refining the plan for weeks, hoping to advance an idea that Republicans since the Reagan era have unsuccessfully championed in Congress against stiff opposition from Democrats and patient advocates. During the Obamacare repeal debate in 2017, Republican proposals to cap and shrink federal Medicaid spending helped galvanize public opposition, with projections showing millions would be forced off coverage.
[...] [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema] Verma has been trying to insert block grant language into federal guidance for months but has encountered heave scrutiny from agency lawyers, two CMS staffers said. She mentioned interest in using her agency's authority to pursue block grants during a meeting with state Medicaid directors in the fall but did not provide details, said two individuals who attended.
With the reported push, Park added, the administration "is again ignoring lessons of 2017 repeal/cap fight & 2018 midterms. Medicaid is very popular (74% favorable opinion) & block grants are definitely not (71% oppose)."
Offering an 18-point Twitter thread to expose the dangers of proposal, Rebecca Vallas, who serves as vice president for the Center for American Progress's Poverty to Prosperity Program, asserted, "Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect."
\u201c4. By shifting costs to states in a huge way, block-granting Medicaid will force them to make dramatic cuts to their Medicaid programs. (Read: kick huge numbers of people off of health insurance.)\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@urbaninstitute 6. One of the groups who\u2019d be hurt the most: people with disabilities. This is because for many people with disabilities & severe health conditions, Medicaid provides a lot more than just health insurance\u2014it enables independent living.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@rwest817 @kfgrobbins 9. Worth noting: even people who aren\u2019t kicked off Medicaid would be hurt, as we\u2019d also see states cook up new ways to deny beneficiaries the medicines, procedures, tests & other critical services they need, in order to further reduce costs.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c14. Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect.\n\nFor context: the Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 208,000 \u201cunnecessary deaths\u201d would occur by 2026 if the Senate GOP health care repeal plan had taken effect. https://t.co/dWMAPGmcvO\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324969
She also included in the thread that among those who would be most hurt are people with disabilities; that it could take away Medicaid from between 14 and 21 million Americans; that even those not kicked off the program would still be hurt; and that the administration is setting itself up for legal action.
That last point was noted in a tweet by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid:
\u201cCMS doesn\u2019t have the legal authority to block grant Medicaid. Block grants undermine the protections of the Medicaid program and put our most vulnerable citizens at risk.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1547246639
Another lawmaker chiming in was Senate Finance Committee member Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who offered a blunt "Hell no" to the plan.
"If the Administration tries to decimate Medicaid through executive action after its scheme was rejected by Congress and the American people, I will fight it with everything I have," he tweeted.
Following reporting that the Trump administration is planning an attack on Medicaid by seeking key changes in how the program is financed--changes it wants to make without Congressional approval--Democratic lawmakers and healthcare advocates are warning the proposal means healthcare for millions of Americans will be threatened as states will be forced to "make draconian cuts."
The plan, Politico reported Friday citing "three administration sources," would involve states being able to opt for block grants instead of receiving open ended funding as they do now, for supposedly "more flexibility to run the low-income health program that serves nearly 75 million Americans, from poor children, to disabled people, to impoverished seniors in nursing homes."
As for that touted "flexibility," Hannah Katch, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, previously laid out in a blog post:
states already enjoy expansive flexibility under Medicaid, which they're using to streamline healthcare delivery and improve health. A block grant would likely sharply cut federal funding over time and shift large costs to states, eliminating states' ability to invest in innovative reforms. It would only give states the flexibility to make draconian cuts, leaving many beneficiaries uninsured or without access to needed healthcare.
Moreover, as Kelly Allen of the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy explained in a tweet, "Entitlement programs like SNAP and Medicaid see increased need when the economy worsens or during natural disasters. But with a block grant--sorry--it's a fixed pie and when the money is gone, it's gone." Look also to what happened in 2014 with regards to prescription drug spending to see the impact of block grants, said Edwin Park of Georgetown University Health Policy Institute' Center for Children & Families:
\u201cHere's real-life example of states facing higher-than-expected #Medicaid costs. New Hep C treatment drugs in 2014 caused big spike in Rx spending. Unlike current law where federal $ automatically increases in response, no additional $ under block grant/cap.\u201d— Edwin Park (@Edwin Park) 1547481343
The Kaiser Family Foundation offered this info graphic to contrast the funding as it currently is with how it would be with block grants:
\u201cBlock grants or per capita caps could limit federal financing for #Medicaid. This brief outlines five key questions to consider, as well as the potential implications, as the debate on these policies moves forward. https://t.co/XgIRmqt1yy\u201d— KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation) (@KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation)) 1547395322
Politico added:
the administration has been deliberating and refining the plan for weeks, hoping to advance an idea that Republicans since the Reagan era have unsuccessfully championed in Congress against stiff opposition from Democrats and patient advocates. During the Obamacare repeal debate in 2017, Republican proposals to cap and shrink federal Medicaid spending helped galvanize public opposition, with projections showing millions would be forced off coverage.
[...] [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Seema] Verma has been trying to insert block grant language into federal guidance for months but has encountered heave scrutiny from agency lawyers, two CMS staffers said. She mentioned interest in using her agency's authority to pursue block grants during a meeting with state Medicaid directors in the fall but did not provide details, said two individuals who attended.
With the reported push, Park added, the administration "is again ignoring lessons of 2017 repeal/cap fight & 2018 midterms. Medicaid is very popular (74% favorable opinion) & block grants are definitely not (71% oppose)."
Offering an 18-point Twitter thread to expose the dangers of proposal, Rebecca Vallas, who serves as vice president for the Center for American Progress's Poverty to Prosperity Program, asserted, "Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect."
\u201c4. By shifting costs to states in a huge way, block-granting Medicaid will force them to make dramatic cuts to their Medicaid programs. (Read: kick huge numbers of people off of health insurance.)\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@urbaninstitute 6. One of the groups who\u2019d be hurt the most: people with disabilities. This is because for many people with disabilities & severe health conditions, Medicaid provides a lot more than just health insurance\u2014it enables independent living.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c@rwest817 @kfgrobbins 9. Worth noting: even people who aren\u2019t kicked off Medicaid would be hurt, as we\u2019d also see states cook up new ways to deny beneficiaries the medicines, procedures, tests & other critical services they need, in order to further reduce costs.\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324653
\u201c14. Make no mistake: people will die if Medicaid block grants take effect.\n\nFor context: the Congressional Budget Office estimated that more than 208,000 \u201cunnecessary deaths\u201d would occur by 2026 if the Senate GOP health care repeal plan had taken effect. https://t.co/dWMAPGmcvO\u201d— Rebecca Vallas (@Rebecca Vallas) 1547324969
She also included in the thread that among those who would be most hurt are people with disabilities; that it could take away Medicaid from between 14 and 21 million Americans; that even those not kicked off the program would still be hurt; and that the administration is setting itself up for legal action.
That last point was noted in a tweet by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid:
\u201cCMS doesn\u2019t have the legal authority to block grant Medicaid. Block grants undermine the protections of the Medicaid program and put our most vulnerable citizens at risk.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1547246639
Another lawmaker chiming in was Senate Finance Committee member Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who offered a blunt "Hell no" to the plan.
"If the Administration tries to decimate Medicaid through executive action after its scheme was rejected by Congress and the American people, I will fight it with everything I have," he tweeted.