"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle," political analyst Stephen Wolf wrote on Twitter. (Photo: NBC News)
Judge Voices 'Great Concern' Over North Dakota Voter ID Law, But Rejects Tribe's Lawsuit Anyway
"This decision ensures that hundreds, perhaps thousands of Native Americans will not be able to vote in the upcoming election."
This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates...
Despite declaring there is "great cause for concern" that thousands of Native Americans could be illegally barred from voting under North Dakota's strict and overtly discriminatory voter ID law, a federal judge on Thursday rejected a lawsuit filed by the Spirit Lake Tribe and six individual plaintiffs arguing that the law violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle."
--Stephen Wolf, Daily Kos
"This decision ensures that hundreds, perhaps thousands of Native Americans will not be able to vote in the upcoming election," noted Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern.
In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Hovland argued that granting the tribe's request for an emergency restraining order to prevent the ID law from going into effect would cause confusion too close to the Nov. 6 midterm elections and declared that "it is highly important to preserve the status quo when elections are fast approaching."
Stephen Wolf, a political analyst with Daily Kos, called this rationale for voter suppression "ridiculous."
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle," Wolf wrote on Twitter.
\u201cNorth Dakota Republicans designed their voter ID law to disenfranchise Native Americans. It worked as intended. And the courts have permitted this flagrant voter suppression. Today is a terrible day for voting rights. https://t.co/0PS40N1aI5 @Slate\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1541100326
Corey Goldstone, a spokesperson for the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center--one of the organizations representing the Spirit Lake Tribe--told The Center for Public Integrity that he is "disappointed" with the judge's ruling.
"While we are disappointed with the order, Judge Hovland was correct that the evidence indicates that disenfranchisement will be 'certain,'" Goldstone concluded. "We are considering our options."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates...
Despite declaring there is "great cause for concern" that thousands of Native Americans could be illegally barred from voting under North Dakota's strict and overtly discriminatory voter ID law, a federal judge on Thursday rejected a lawsuit filed by the Spirit Lake Tribe and six individual plaintiffs arguing that the law violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle."
--Stephen Wolf, Daily Kos
"This decision ensures that hundreds, perhaps thousands of Native Americans will not be able to vote in the upcoming election," noted Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern.
In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Hovland argued that granting the tribe's request for an emergency restraining order to prevent the ID law from going into effect would cause confusion too close to the Nov. 6 midterm elections and declared that "it is highly important to preserve the status quo when elections are fast approaching."
Stephen Wolf, a political analyst with Daily Kos, called this rationale for voter suppression "ridiculous."
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle," Wolf wrote on Twitter.
\u201cNorth Dakota Republicans designed their voter ID law to disenfranchise Native Americans. It worked as intended. And the courts have permitted this flagrant voter suppression. Today is a terrible day for voting rights. https://t.co/0PS40N1aI5 @Slate\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1541100326
Corey Goldstone, a spokesperson for the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center--one of the organizations representing the Spirit Lake Tribe--told The Center for Public Integrity that he is "disappointed" with the judge's ruling.
"While we are disappointed with the order, Judge Hovland was correct that the evidence indicates that disenfranchisement will be 'certain,'" Goldstone concluded. "We are considering our options."
This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates...
Despite declaring there is "great cause for concern" that thousands of Native Americans could be illegally barred from voting under North Dakota's strict and overtly discriminatory voter ID law, a federal judge on Thursday rejected a lawsuit filed by the Spirit Lake Tribe and six individual plaintiffs arguing that the law violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle."
--Stephen Wolf, Daily Kos
"This decision ensures that hundreds, perhaps thousands of Native Americans will not be able to vote in the upcoming election," noted Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern.
In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Hovland argued that granting the tribe's request for an emergency restraining order to prevent the ID law from going into effect would cause confusion too close to the Nov. 6 midterm elections and declared that "it is highly important to preserve the status quo when elections are fast approaching."
Stephen Wolf, a political analyst with Daily Kos, called this rationale for voter suppression "ridiculous."
"Letting Republican lawmakers abridge American citizens' fundamental right to vote simply because it's too close to an election is a ridiculous principle," Wolf wrote on Twitter.
\u201cNorth Dakota Republicans designed their voter ID law to disenfranchise Native Americans. It worked as intended. And the courts have permitted this flagrant voter suppression. Today is a terrible day for voting rights. https://t.co/0PS40N1aI5 @Slate\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1541100326
Corey Goldstone, a spokesperson for the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center--one of the organizations representing the Spirit Lake Tribe--told The Center for Public Integrity that he is "disappointed" with the judge's ruling.
"While we are disappointed with the order, Judge Hovland was correct that the evidence indicates that disenfranchisement will be 'certain,'" Goldstone concluded. "We are considering our options."