SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
LGBTQ+ activists from the National Center for Transgender Equality, partner organizations, and their supporters hold a 'We Will Not Be Erased' rally in front of the White House October 22, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Trump State Dept. Accused of Trying to Export Hate by Spreading Attack on Transgender People to United Nations
New reporting by Guardian reveals another prong in the administration's assault on transgender community
Oct 26, 2018
In a further sign of the Trump-Pence administration's "attempt to erase transgender people," the Guardian reported this week that U.S. officials are pursuing an effort to strip the word "gender" from United Nations documents on human rights.
The push from Washington-dispatched officials has been made at recent meetings of the U.N's Third Committee of the General Assembly, a body tasked with "items relating to a range of social, humanitarian affairs, and human rights issues that affect people all over the world."
"We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
--National Center for Transgender EqualityOne example of the push is U.S. officials' desire to replace "gender-based violence" with "violence against women" in a draft "Trafficking in women and girls" resolution put forth this month.
"To succeed in its campaign," the Guardian noted, "the U.S. will have to forge unusual alliances, with Russia and conservative Islamic states, against its western European partners."
According to Mara Keisling, the executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, "While it's infuriating [the administration] would behave in such an extreme and volatile manner at the United Nations, we are confident their prejudice will lose out to science, reason, and the ongoing fight for human rights."
The State Department, for its part, dismissed the allegation it is "attempting to exclude the protection of transgendered persons." The National Center for Transgender Equality, however, argued Friday that the "State Department is trying to deny that what they're doing harms the trans community. We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
Less than a week ago, New York Times reported on a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) memo, in circulation since the spring, revealing that "the Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a government-wide effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law."
Such an effort, said Diana Flynn, litigation director at civil rights organization Lambda Legal, would be "clearly another ideologically-driven attempt by the Trump administration to marginalize transgender people and force them into the shadows. They have neither law nor fact on their side, and we will not accept this shameless attempt on the part of our government to erase the very existence of transgender members of our community."
The Guardian's new reporting also comes the same week as the Trump's Justice Department argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that federal anti-sex discrimination laws should not be extended to trans workers.
James D. Esseks, who leads the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, & HIV Project, called the Justice Department's position in the case "part of a much larger attack on transgender people by the Trump administration," and noted proposal in the recently revealed DHS memo, which he denounced as "a shameful, hate-filled move."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a further sign of the Trump-Pence administration's "attempt to erase transgender people," the Guardian reported this week that U.S. officials are pursuing an effort to strip the word "gender" from United Nations documents on human rights.
The push from Washington-dispatched officials has been made at recent meetings of the U.N's Third Committee of the General Assembly, a body tasked with "items relating to a range of social, humanitarian affairs, and human rights issues that affect people all over the world."
"We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
--National Center for Transgender EqualityOne example of the push is U.S. officials' desire to replace "gender-based violence" with "violence against women" in a draft "Trafficking in women and girls" resolution put forth this month.
"To succeed in its campaign," the Guardian noted, "the U.S. will have to forge unusual alliances, with Russia and conservative Islamic states, against its western European partners."
According to Mara Keisling, the executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, "While it's infuriating [the administration] would behave in such an extreme and volatile manner at the United Nations, we are confident their prejudice will lose out to science, reason, and the ongoing fight for human rights."
The State Department, for its part, dismissed the allegation it is "attempting to exclude the protection of transgendered persons." The National Center for Transgender Equality, however, argued Friday that the "State Department is trying to deny that what they're doing harms the trans community. We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
Less than a week ago, New York Times reported on a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) memo, in circulation since the spring, revealing that "the Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a government-wide effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law."
Such an effort, said Diana Flynn, litigation director at civil rights organization Lambda Legal, would be "clearly another ideologically-driven attempt by the Trump administration to marginalize transgender people and force them into the shadows. They have neither law nor fact on their side, and we will not accept this shameless attempt on the part of our government to erase the very existence of transgender members of our community."
The Guardian's new reporting also comes the same week as the Trump's Justice Department argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that federal anti-sex discrimination laws should not be extended to trans workers.
James D. Esseks, who leads the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, & HIV Project, called the Justice Department's position in the case "part of a much larger attack on transgender people by the Trump administration," and noted proposal in the recently revealed DHS memo, which he denounced as "a shameful, hate-filled move."
In a further sign of the Trump-Pence administration's "attempt to erase transgender people," the Guardian reported this week that U.S. officials are pursuing an effort to strip the word "gender" from United Nations documents on human rights.
The push from Washington-dispatched officials has been made at recent meetings of the U.N's Third Committee of the General Assembly, a body tasked with "items relating to a range of social, humanitarian affairs, and human rights issues that affect people all over the world."
"We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
--National Center for Transgender EqualityOne example of the push is U.S. officials' desire to replace "gender-based violence" with "violence against women" in a draft "Trafficking in women and girls" resolution put forth this month.
"To succeed in its campaign," the Guardian noted, "the U.S. will have to forge unusual alliances, with Russia and conservative Islamic states, against its western European partners."
According to Mara Keisling, the executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, "While it's infuriating [the administration] would behave in such an extreme and volatile manner at the United Nations, we are confident their prejudice will lose out to science, reason, and the ongoing fight for human rights."
The State Department, for its part, dismissed the allegation it is "attempting to exclude the protection of transgendered persons." The National Center for Transgender Equality, however, argued Friday that the "State Department is trying to deny that what they're doing harms the trans community. We see this for what it is--another attempt to define transgender people out of existence."
Less than a week ago, New York Times reported on a Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) memo, in circulation since the spring, revealing that "the Trump administration is considering narrowly defining gender as a biological, immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth, the most drastic move yet in a government-wide effort to roll back recognition and protections of transgender people under federal civil rights law."
Such an effort, said Diana Flynn, litigation director at civil rights organization Lambda Legal, would be "clearly another ideologically-driven attempt by the Trump administration to marginalize transgender people and force them into the shadows. They have neither law nor fact on their side, and we will not accept this shameless attempt on the part of our government to erase the very existence of transgender members of our community."
The Guardian's new reporting also comes the same week as the Trump's Justice Department argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that federal anti-sex discrimination laws should not be extended to trans workers.
James D. Esseks, who leads the ACLU's Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, & HIV Project, called the Justice Department's position in the case "part of a much larger attack on transgender people by the Trump administration," and noted proposal in the recently revealed DHS memo, which he denounced as "a shameful, hate-filled move."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.