SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Postal workers and critics of the Trump administration's plans to privatize the United States Postal Service (USPS) carried signs at a Los Angeles protest on Oct. 8, 2018. (Photo: Chloe Osmer/Twitter)
US Mail Is #NotForSale: Postal Workers Nationwide Stand Together Against Trump's Privatization Plan
"Our postal system has never belonged to any president, any political party, or any company. It's belonged to the people of this country."
Oct 09, 2018
As the United States Postal Service (USPS) closed on Monday for a national holiday celebrated by many municipalities as Indigenous Peoples Day, workers across the country held a day of action to protest President Donald Trump's proposal to privatize the postal service.
Under the proposal--unveiled in June as part of a 32-point plan (pdf) to significantly reorganize the federal government--USPS would "transition to a model of private management and private or shared ownership." The White House argued that "freeing USPS to more fully negotiate pay and benefits rather than prescribing participation in costly federal personnel benefit programs, and allowing it to follow private sector practices in compensation and labor relations, could further reduce costs."
Critics warn that such a transition would not only negatively impact service but also bring awful consequences for postal workers, who demonstrated on their day off in cities across the United States on Monday to tell the president that USPS is #NotForSale.
"Postal workers are rallying to urge lawmakers to stop the selling off of the public postal service for private profit--and to remind everyone the Postal Service is yours," Julie Bates, a 22-year postal worker, wrote last week.
Pointing to similar moves by other countries--including the United Kingdom--as cautionary tales, Bates warned that if USPS is sold off to private interests, the public should anticipate "higher prices, slower delivery, and an end to universal, uniform, and affordable service to every corner of the country."
While recognizing that the national mail service has faced problems in recent years, as Bates explained:
The truth is that the USPS's problems were largely created by Congress.
A bipartisan 2006 law, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, mandated that the USPS pre-fund future retiree health benefits 75 years into the future. That means we have to fund retirement benefits for postal employees who haven't even been born yet.
It's a crushing burden that no other agency or company--public or private--is required to meet, or could even survive.
Some Democratic members of Congress--including Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) as well as Reps. Grace Meng (N.Y.) and Dwight Evans (Penn.)--joined demonstrations in their states:
"Our postal system is older than the country itself. It was a vital component of our country's public good then. It still is today," Bates concluded. "And along the way, one fundamental fact has always been true: Our postal system has never belonged to any president, any political party, or any company. It's belonged to the people of this country."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As the United States Postal Service (USPS) closed on Monday for a national holiday celebrated by many municipalities as Indigenous Peoples Day, workers across the country held a day of action to protest President Donald Trump's proposal to privatize the postal service.
Under the proposal--unveiled in June as part of a 32-point plan (pdf) to significantly reorganize the federal government--USPS would "transition to a model of private management and private or shared ownership." The White House argued that "freeing USPS to more fully negotiate pay and benefits rather than prescribing participation in costly federal personnel benefit programs, and allowing it to follow private sector practices in compensation and labor relations, could further reduce costs."
Critics warn that such a transition would not only negatively impact service but also bring awful consequences for postal workers, who demonstrated on their day off in cities across the United States on Monday to tell the president that USPS is #NotForSale.
"Postal workers are rallying to urge lawmakers to stop the selling off of the public postal service for private profit--and to remind everyone the Postal Service is yours," Julie Bates, a 22-year postal worker, wrote last week.
Pointing to similar moves by other countries--including the United Kingdom--as cautionary tales, Bates warned that if USPS is sold off to private interests, the public should anticipate "higher prices, slower delivery, and an end to universal, uniform, and affordable service to every corner of the country."
While recognizing that the national mail service has faced problems in recent years, as Bates explained:
The truth is that the USPS's problems were largely created by Congress.
A bipartisan 2006 law, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, mandated that the USPS pre-fund future retiree health benefits 75 years into the future. That means we have to fund retirement benefits for postal employees who haven't even been born yet.
It's a crushing burden that no other agency or company--public or private--is required to meet, or could even survive.
Some Democratic members of Congress--including Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) as well as Reps. Grace Meng (N.Y.) and Dwight Evans (Penn.)--joined demonstrations in their states:
"Our postal system is older than the country itself. It was a vital component of our country's public good then. It still is today," Bates concluded. "And along the way, one fundamental fact has always been true: Our postal system has never belonged to any president, any political party, or any company. It's belonged to the people of this country."
As the United States Postal Service (USPS) closed on Monday for a national holiday celebrated by many municipalities as Indigenous Peoples Day, workers across the country held a day of action to protest President Donald Trump's proposal to privatize the postal service.
Under the proposal--unveiled in June as part of a 32-point plan (pdf) to significantly reorganize the federal government--USPS would "transition to a model of private management and private or shared ownership." The White House argued that "freeing USPS to more fully negotiate pay and benefits rather than prescribing participation in costly federal personnel benefit programs, and allowing it to follow private sector practices in compensation and labor relations, could further reduce costs."
Critics warn that such a transition would not only negatively impact service but also bring awful consequences for postal workers, who demonstrated on their day off in cities across the United States on Monday to tell the president that USPS is #NotForSale.
"Postal workers are rallying to urge lawmakers to stop the selling off of the public postal service for private profit--and to remind everyone the Postal Service is yours," Julie Bates, a 22-year postal worker, wrote last week.
Pointing to similar moves by other countries--including the United Kingdom--as cautionary tales, Bates warned that if USPS is sold off to private interests, the public should anticipate "higher prices, slower delivery, and an end to universal, uniform, and affordable service to every corner of the country."
While recognizing that the national mail service has faced problems in recent years, as Bates explained:
The truth is that the USPS's problems were largely created by Congress.
A bipartisan 2006 law, the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, mandated that the USPS pre-fund future retiree health benefits 75 years into the future. That means we have to fund retirement benefits for postal employees who haven't even been born yet.
It's a crushing burden that no other agency or company--public or private--is required to meet, or could even survive.
Some Democratic members of Congress--including Sen. Dick Durbin (Ill.) as well as Reps. Grace Meng (N.Y.) and Dwight Evans (Penn.)--joined demonstrations in their states:
"Our postal system is older than the country itself. It was a vital component of our country's public good then. It still is today," Bates concluded. "And along the way, one fundamental fact has always been true: Our postal system has never belonged to any president, any political party, or any company. It's belonged to the people of this country."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.