SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), and Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) hold a news conference about Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaughon Capitol Hill August 2, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
'What Are Republicans Hiding?' GOP Senators Kill Democratic Effort to Subpoena Kavanaugh Documents
"What is it worth for these witnesses to stand before our committee, raise their hand, and take an oath if they then turn around and say things that are not true to us and are not held accountable?"
Sep 13, 2018
Bolstering accusations that they are actively working to suppress elements of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh's record that could put his confirmation in jeopardy, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday teamed up to block a coordinated effort by Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents that have been withheld by the White House under so-called "constitutional privilege."
"This nomination is going to be tainted," declared Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) before Republicans squashed his motion to subpoena documents from Kavanaugh's tenure as staff secretary under former President George W. Bush. "It will be stained by a badly broken process that has shattered the norms and broken the traditions of this committee. It has been rushed through to judgement in a highly partisan and unfortunately failed way."
"We all deserve to know what they're hiding."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
In a series party-line votes, the GOP defeated a total of six motions by Senate Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents from his time working in the Bush White House.
"What is it worth for these witnesses to stand before our committee, raise their hand, and take an oath if they then turn around and say things that are not true to us and are not held accountable?" asked Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who on Wednesday released documents that suggest Kavanaugh lied to the Senate under oath. "Is there any credibility in this committee?"
"We think it's outrageous we're not even given the reason why they were withheld," Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said of the White House's move last month to withhold 100,000 pages of documents from senators ahead of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege. Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
--Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Along with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Klobuchar introduced a motion to subpoena the documents the Trump administration decided to hide from senators and the public.
Before his motion was shot down by Republicans, Whitehouse noted that the Trump administration is entering "foggy and dangerous territory" by invoking "constitutional privilege" to justify mass suppression of crucial documents.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege," Whitehouse said. "Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
In a series of tweets responding to the GOP's successful effort to stonewall moves toward greater transparency, Vanita Gupta--president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights--asked on Twitter, "What are Republicans hiding from the American people?"
"We deserve better than this," Gupta added. "Vote after vote, Republicans just blocked motions from the Judiciary Democrats to subpoena individuals and records that would help shed more light on Brett Kavanaugh's controversial record. We deserve to know why. And we all deserve to know what they're hiding."
The organized effort by Senate Democrats to force the disclosure of more Kavanaugh documents comes as they are facing pressure to pull out all the stops to defeat the right-wing judge's nomination.
While some Democratic senators have unilaterally released dozens of documents marked "committee confidential," political analysts and progressive groups are urging Democrats to dump all of the documents ahead of the final vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation, which was delayed until next Thursday.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bolstering accusations that they are actively working to suppress elements of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh's record that could put his confirmation in jeopardy, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday teamed up to block a coordinated effort by Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents that have been withheld by the White House under so-called "constitutional privilege."
"This nomination is going to be tainted," declared Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) before Republicans squashed his motion to subpoena documents from Kavanaugh's tenure as staff secretary under former President George W. Bush. "It will be stained by a badly broken process that has shattered the norms and broken the traditions of this committee. It has been rushed through to judgement in a highly partisan and unfortunately failed way."
"We all deserve to know what they're hiding."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
In a series party-line votes, the GOP defeated a total of six motions by Senate Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents from his time working in the Bush White House.
"What is it worth for these witnesses to stand before our committee, raise their hand, and take an oath if they then turn around and say things that are not true to us and are not held accountable?" asked Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who on Wednesday released documents that suggest Kavanaugh lied to the Senate under oath. "Is there any credibility in this committee?"
"We think it's outrageous we're not even given the reason why they were withheld," Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said of the White House's move last month to withhold 100,000 pages of documents from senators ahead of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege. Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
--Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Along with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Klobuchar introduced a motion to subpoena the documents the Trump administration decided to hide from senators and the public.
Before his motion was shot down by Republicans, Whitehouse noted that the Trump administration is entering "foggy and dangerous territory" by invoking "constitutional privilege" to justify mass suppression of crucial documents.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege," Whitehouse said. "Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
In a series of tweets responding to the GOP's successful effort to stonewall moves toward greater transparency, Vanita Gupta--president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights--asked on Twitter, "What are Republicans hiding from the American people?"
"We deserve better than this," Gupta added. "Vote after vote, Republicans just blocked motions from the Judiciary Democrats to subpoena individuals and records that would help shed more light on Brett Kavanaugh's controversial record. We deserve to know why. And we all deserve to know what they're hiding."
The organized effort by Senate Democrats to force the disclosure of more Kavanaugh documents comes as they are facing pressure to pull out all the stops to defeat the right-wing judge's nomination.
While some Democratic senators have unilaterally released dozens of documents marked "committee confidential," political analysts and progressive groups are urging Democrats to dump all of the documents ahead of the final vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation, which was delayed until next Thursday.
Bolstering accusations that they are actively working to suppress elements of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh's record that could put his confirmation in jeopardy, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday teamed up to block a coordinated effort by Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents that have been withheld by the White House under so-called "constitutional privilege."
"This nomination is going to be tainted," declared Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) before Republicans squashed his motion to subpoena documents from Kavanaugh's tenure as staff secretary under former President George W. Bush. "It will be stained by a badly broken process that has shattered the norms and broken the traditions of this committee. It has been rushed through to judgement in a highly partisan and unfortunately failed way."
"We all deserve to know what they're hiding."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
In a series party-line votes, the GOP defeated a total of six motions by Senate Democrats to subpoena Kavanaugh documents from his time working in the Bush White House.
"What is it worth for these witnesses to stand before our committee, raise their hand, and take an oath if they then turn around and say things that are not true to us and are not held accountable?" asked Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who on Wednesday released documents that suggest Kavanaugh lied to the Senate under oath. "Is there any credibility in this committee?"
"We think it's outrageous we're not even given the reason why they were withheld," Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said of the White House's move last month to withhold 100,000 pages of documents from senators ahead of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege. Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
--Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Along with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Klobuchar introduced a motion to subpoena the documents the Trump administration decided to hide from senators and the public.
Before his motion was shot down by Republicans, Whitehouse noted that the Trump administration is entering "foggy and dangerous territory" by invoking "constitutional privilege" to justify mass suppression of crucial documents.
"They don't even call it executive privilege. They call it something called constitutional privilege," Whitehouse said. "Who the hell knows what that is? That's never been litigated before."
In a series of tweets responding to the GOP's successful effort to stonewall moves toward greater transparency, Vanita Gupta--president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights--asked on Twitter, "What are Republicans hiding from the American people?"
"We deserve better than this," Gupta added. "Vote after vote, Republicans just blocked motions from the Judiciary Democrats to subpoena individuals and records that would help shed more light on Brett Kavanaugh's controversial record. We deserve to know why. And we all deserve to know what they're hiding."
The organized effort by Senate Democrats to force the disclosure of more Kavanaugh documents comes as they are facing pressure to pull out all the stops to defeat the right-wing judge's nomination.
While some Democratic senators have unilaterally released dozens of documents marked "committee confidential," political analysts and progressive groups are urging Democrats to dump all of the documents ahead of the final vote on Kavanaugh's confirmation, which was delayed until next Thursday.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.