SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Recent immigrants are substantially healthier than native-born Americans, which benefits the American healthcare economy. But to maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare," said Lila Flavin, a medical student at Tufts University School of Medicine. (Photo: OverpassLightBrigade/Twitter)
Debunking Trump's Racist Myth, Study Shows Immigrants Boosting US Healthcare, Not Draining It
"The Trump administration's narrative is not based in fact but is simply part of a much broader attempt to penalize and disparage immigrants."
Aug 08, 2018
With the Trump administration reportedly close to unveiling a xenophobic proposal that portrays immigrants as leeches who exploit government healthcare programs at tremendous cost to U.S. taxpayers, a new study published on Wednesday shows that--contrary to the White House's narrative--immigrants effectively subsidize the care of native-born Americans by paying more into the healthcare system than they receive in treatment.
"To maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
--Lila Flavin, Tufts University
"Overall, immigrants almost certainly paid more toward medical expenses than they withdrew, providing a low-risk pool that subsidized the public and private health insurance markets," researchers from Harvard Medical School and Tufts University write in a summary of their findings, which were published in the International Journal of Health Services. "We conclude that insurance and medical care should be made more available to immigrants rather than less so."
As NBC News reported on Tuesday, the White House--led by President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller--is expected to release a plan in "the coming weeks" that will make it harder for legal immigrants who have used government programs like food stamps and Obamacare to become citizens. A spokeswoman for the State Department justified the widely denounced proposal as an effort to ensure "that foreign nationals seeking to enter or remain in the U.S. are self-sufficient."
In an email to Common Dreams, Dr. J. Wesley Boyd--associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and co-author of the new study--denounced the White House's reported plan and said the data clearly demonstrates that "the Trump administration's narrative is not based in fact but is simply part of a much broader attempt to penalize and disparage immigrants."
Lila Flavin--a medical student at Tufts University School of Medicine who co-authored the new study--argued in a statement that not only are immigrants "self-sufficient," they are also "propping up the Medicare Trust Fund by paying much more into Medicare than they will ever receive in benefits."
"Recent immigrants are substantially healthier than native-born Americans, which benefits the American healthcare economy," Flavin said. "But to maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation."
--National Immigration Law Center
Dr. Boyd concluded that "instead of attacking immigrants for driving up costs, we should recognize their proven economic contributions."
As immigrant rights groups noted in response to the Trump administration's reported plan, the White House is moving in precisely the opposite direction by attempting to demonize and punish immigrants who use government programs.
According to NBC, the Trump administration's proposal could ultimately affect "more than 20 million immigrants" and "fall particularly hard on immigrants working jobs that don't pay enough to support their families."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation," declared the National Immigration Law Center in a series of tweets on Tuesday. "But here's where the Trump administration is making a big mistake. Today, we are witnessing everyday Americans who have stood up, spoken out, and fought back against Trump's abuses. We must stand together and fight the challenges that lie ahead."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With the Trump administration reportedly close to unveiling a xenophobic proposal that portrays immigrants as leeches who exploit government healthcare programs at tremendous cost to U.S. taxpayers, a new study published on Wednesday shows that--contrary to the White House's narrative--immigrants effectively subsidize the care of native-born Americans by paying more into the healthcare system than they receive in treatment.
"To maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
--Lila Flavin, Tufts University
"Overall, immigrants almost certainly paid more toward medical expenses than they withdrew, providing a low-risk pool that subsidized the public and private health insurance markets," researchers from Harvard Medical School and Tufts University write in a summary of their findings, which were published in the International Journal of Health Services. "We conclude that insurance and medical care should be made more available to immigrants rather than less so."
As NBC News reported on Tuesday, the White House--led by President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller--is expected to release a plan in "the coming weeks" that will make it harder for legal immigrants who have used government programs like food stamps and Obamacare to become citizens. A spokeswoman for the State Department justified the widely denounced proposal as an effort to ensure "that foreign nationals seeking to enter or remain in the U.S. are self-sufficient."
In an email to Common Dreams, Dr. J. Wesley Boyd--associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and co-author of the new study--denounced the White House's reported plan and said the data clearly demonstrates that "the Trump administration's narrative is not based in fact but is simply part of a much broader attempt to penalize and disparage immigrants."
Lila Flavin--a medical student at Tufts University School of Medicine who co-authored the new study--argued in a statement that not only are immigrants "self-sufficient," they are also "propping up the Medicare Trust Fund by paying much more into Medicare than they will ever receive in benefits."
"Recent immigrants are substantially healthier than native-born Americans, which benefits the American healthcare economy," Flavin said. "But to maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation."
--National Immigration Law Center
Dr. Boyd concluded that "instead of attacking immigrants for driving up costs, we should recognize their proven economic contributions."
As immigrant rights groups noted in response to the Trump administration's reported plan, the White House is moving in precisely the opposite direction by attempting to demonize and punish immigrants who use government programs.
According to NBC, the Trump administration's proposal could ultimately affect "more than 20 million immigrants" and "fall particularly hard on immigrants working jobs that don't pay enough to support their families."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation," declared the National Immigration Law Center in a series of tweets on Tuesday. "But here's where the Trump administration is making a big mistake. Today, we are witnessing everyday Americans who have stood up, spoken out, and fought back against Trump's abuses. We must stand together and fight the challenges that lie ahead."
With the Trump administration reportedly close to unveiling a xenophobic proposal that portrays immigrants as leeches who exploit government healthcare programs at tremendous cost to U.S. taxpayers, a new study published on Wednesday shows that--contrary to the White House's narrative--immigrants effectively subsidize the care of native-born Americans by paying more into the healthcare system than they receive in treatment.
"To maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
--Lila Flavin, Tufts University
"Overall, immigrants almost certainly paid more toward medical expenses than they withdrew, providing a low-risk pool that subsidized the public and private health insurance markets," researchers from Harvard Medical School and Tufts University write in a summary of their findings, which were published in the International Journal of Health Services. "We conclude that insurance and medical care should be made more available to immigrants rather than less so."
As NBC News reported on Tuesday, the White House--led by President Donald Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller--is expected to release a plan in "the coming weeks" that will make it harder for legal immigrants who have used government programs like food stamps and Obamacare to become citizens. A spokeswoman for the State Department justified the widely denounced proposal as an effort to ensure "that foreign nationals seeking to enter or remain in the U.S. are self-sufficient."
In an email to Common Dreams, Dr. J. Wesley Boyd--associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and co-author of the new study--denounced the White House's reported plan and said the data clearly demonstrates that "the Trump administration's narrative is not based in fact but is simply part of a much broader attempt to penalize and disparage immigrants."
Lila Flavin--a medical student at Tufts University School of Medicine who co-authored the new study--argued in a statement that not only are immigrants "self-sufficient," they are also "propping up the Medicare Trust Fund by paying much more into Medicare than they will ever receive in benefits."
"Recent immigrants are substantially healthier than native-born Americans, which benefits the American healthcare economy," Flavin said. "But to maintain their health over the long-term, new immigrants--and all Americans--need access to good healthcare. Denying care to immigrants is a human rights violation that cannot be justified based on costs, and indeed may raise costs in the future."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation."
--National Immigration Law Center
Dr. Boyd concluded that "instead of attacking immigrants for driving up costs, we should recognize their proven economic contributions."
As immigrant rights groups noted in response to the Trump administration's reported plan, the White House is moving in precisely the opposite direction by attempting to demonize and punish immigrants who use government programs.
According to NBC, the Trump administration's proposal could ultimately affect "more than 20 million immigrants" and "fall particularly hard on immigrants working jobs that don't pay enough to support their families."
"By working hard and building better lives for their families, immigrants have and continue to make our country stronger. This forthcoming Trump regulation would make us a poorer, sicker, hungrier, and weaker nation," declared the National Immigration Law Center in a series of tweets on Tuesday. "But here's where the Trump administration is making a big mistake. Today, we are witnessing everyday Americans who have stood up, spoken out, and fought back against Trump's abuses. We must stand together and fight the challenges that lie ahead."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.