Jun 09, 2018
"The DNC has learned nothing."
That was how the advocacy group People for Bernie reacted to reports late Friday that the rules and bylaws arm of the Democratic National Committee has moved ahead with a new resolution that, according toYahoo News, would "force candidates in Democratic presidential primaries to state that they are Democrats" and "to 'run and serve' as a member" of the party.
"We just came off a devastating presidential loss in 2016. It would seem to me the actual impetus would be to expand the Democratic Party. I just for the life of me don't see any motivation for this beyond personal spite."
While allies of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--who ran as a Democrat in the 2016 presidential primary while still identifying as an independent--said they don't expect the new rules to hinder Sanders' chances of running for the Democratic nomination in 2020 if he chooses to do so, many supporters of the Vermont senator characterized the rule change as a completely unnecessary "slap in the face" to progressive outsiders.
"We just came off a devastating presidential loss in 2016. It would seem to me the actual impetus would be to expand the Democratic Party. I just for the life of me don't see any motivation for this beyond personal spite," Mark Longabaugh, a senior adviser to Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign, told Yahoo News. "I scratch my head and ask why they would want to make the party more narrow and more exclusive."
Other progressives echoed Longabaugh's critique of the new rule on social media, with many noting that such restrictions could demobilize large constituencies that are disaffected with both major political parties.
\u201cWhat defines a Democrat? \n\nVoting w/Democrats?\n\nSupporting issues Democrats should support?\n\nTaking money from Dem orgs & people only?\n\nOr do we just care about labels? Because if that\u2019s the case, most progressives don\u2019t identify as Democrats anymore. That\u2019s an existential crisis\u201d— Nomiki --- "No-me-KEY" (@Nomiki --- "No-me-KEY") 1528510193
\u201c@NomikiKonst Because of the deterioration of our politics, for most folks \u201cbeing a Dem\u201d means you get the party\u2019s fundraising emails, direct mails, solicitation calls, & robocalls. That\u2019s about it. It\u2019s not enough of a relationship. Hence the rise of independents & the \u201cexistential crisis\u201d\u201d— Nomiki --- "No-me-KEY" (@Nomiki --- "No-me-KEY") 1528510193
\u201cDemocrats don't want Bernie-Most-Popular-Politician-In-America-Sanders running for President, but they're perfectly fine with Mark-Raise-The-Social-Security-Retirement-Age-Warner, because although he commonly votes with Republicans, he IDs as a Democrat https://t.co/SfLqyyc1wg\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1528499613
Following his 2016 presidential campaign, Sanders--who is now far-and-away the most popular politician in the country--repeatedly emphasized the importance of creating a more inclusive party organized around the needs of the poor and working class, not corporate donors.
"If the Democratic Party is going to succeed... it's gonna have to open its door to independents," Sanders said in an interview last April. "There are probably more independents in this country than Democrats or Republicans. It's got to open its doors to working people and to young people, create a grassroots party."
Speaking with Politico on Friday, Longabaugh argued that the DNC's new rule would do precisely the opposite, moving the party even closer to becoming an "exclusive club."
"I really don't get the motivation for the resolution at all," he said. "You know, Bernie Sanders got 13 million votes in 2016. Thousands, if not millions, of those votes were young people and independents he brought into the Democratic Party."
The full DNC is expected to hold a final vote on the new resolution in August.
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.