Jun 04, 2018
Recent experiences of black Americans who have been harassed by neighbors and strangers have led a group to call for congressional hearings on racial profiling by companies as well as individuals.
"Over the last few years high profile cases of racial profiling that have turned deadly have made national headlines and prompted long-overdue calls for criminal justice reform and transparency," wrote the group. "It is within this focus, then, that we are calling on the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to hold a hearing on racial profiling."
The letter was signed by six people who have recently been targeted for calls to law enforcement while going about everyday activities.
Darren Martin was mistaken for an armed robber by one of his new neighbors while he was moving into an apartment in New York while Donisha Prendergast had a similar experience while loading suitcases into a car at a home she had rented. Lolade Siyonbola found herself showing her Yale student ID to police and explaining that she had every right to be on campus, after a classmate reported her for taking a nap in a common area in a dormitory.
"These egregious affronts on human rights, eerily reminiscent of some of the darkest chapters in our nation's history, are the sad reality for black people in America," the letter says.
Racial profiling has a long history in the U.S., the letter notes. But recent cases of kneejerk phone calls to the police have taken place amid widespread national coverage of police killings of unarmed black Americans.
"The domino effect that ensues from a racially-biased 911 call is a costly one, from the financial and time resources pulled from 911 operators to the protocol police officers must then follow," reads the letter. "By assuming an excessive response, which risks arrest, incarceration, and death, generations of black lives pay the ultimate cost. Holding false accusers accountable and examining protocol practices should be a focus of this hearing."
Recent high-profile cases of people calling the police on black community members also include that of a woman reporting two men barbecuing at a park in Oakland, Calif., an airline passenger reporting a woman whose arm was touching hers on a flight, and two men being handcuffed in a Starbucks after an employee called the police to report that they were sitting in the store. On social media, others have shared their own stories and some have argued that police should fine callers once it is determined that the person who a call was about was taking part in an activity that should not have reasonably provoked suspicion.
\u201c@Freeyourmindkid Not me but some new people moved in across the street from us. Shortly thereafter, they called the police on my brother for smoking a cigarette in the front yard of the house he\u2019d lived in since he was six years old (he was 19 at the time). #LivingWhileBlack\u201d— Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken (@Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken) 1524272435
\u201cSeriously, #Police MUST start issuing tickets - with fines - for calling police on people just #LivingWhileBlack.\nI am really sick of theses sotires - they are #Deplorable \nhttps://t.co/7U6YcYDEym\u201d— Dr. Bobby Sands (@Dr. Bobby Sands) 1527788127
"It is a crime to file a false police report," wrote Stacey Patton and Anthony Paul Farley in the Washington Post recently. "When places of public accommodation enlist the police to remove people based on race, the owners and managers should be investigated and prosecuted for filing false police reports. At the Philly Starbucks, the Yale dorm, the golf course, or the Oakland park, the police investigation should have focused on the frivolous and possibly criminal abuses of the 911 emergency system rather than on the people who were doing nothing wrong when someone called about them."
As of now, noted Patton and Farley, summoning the police to engage a black person who has simply made the caller "uncomfortable" carries few consequences for white people. Examination of the issue by lawmakers could bring about more understanding of potential solutions that could deter frivolous calls to the police.
"Right now, calling 911 on innocent black people is a costless form of indulgence in racialized fear--or worse, racist amusement," wrote Patton and Farley. "But lawsuits and publicity might make callers think twice and decrease the danger of false arrest and death."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Recent experiences of black Americans who have been harassed by neighbors and strangers have led a group to call for congressional hearings on racial profiling by companies as well as individuals.
"Over the last few years high profile cases of racial profiling that have turned deadly have made national headlines and prompted long-overdue calls for criminal justice reform and transparency," wrote the group. "It is within this focus, then, that we are calling on the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to hold a hearing on racial profiling."
The letter was signed by six people who have recently been targeted for calls to law enforcement while going about everyday activities.
Darren Martin was mistaken for an armed robber by one of his new neighbors while he was moving into an apartment in New York while Donisha Prendergast had a similar experience while loading suitcases into a car at a home she had rented. Lolade Siyonbola found herself showing her Yale student ID to police and explaining that she had every right to be on campus, after a classmate reported her for taking a nap in a common area in a dormitory.
"These egregious affronts on human rights, eerily reminiscent of some of the darkest chapters in our nation's history, are the sad reality for black people in America," the letter says.
Racial profiling has a long history in the U.S., the letter notes. But recent cases of kneejerk phone calls to the police have taken place amid widespread national coverage of police killings of unarmed black Americans.
"The domino effect that ensues from a racially-biased 911 call is a costly one, from the financial and time resources pulled from 911 operators to the protocol police officers must then follow," reads the letter. "By assuming an excessive response, which risks arrest, incarceration, and death, generations of black lives pay the ultimate cost. Holding false accusers accountable and examining protocol practices should be a focus of this hearing."
Recent high-profile cases of people calling the police on black community members also include that of a woman reporting two men barbecuing at a park in Oakland, Calif., an airline passenger reporting a woman whose arm was touching hers on a flight, and two men being handcuffed in a Starbucks after an employee called the police to report that they were sitting in the store. On social media, others have shared their own stories and some have argued that police should fine callers once it is determined that the person who a call was about was taking part in an activity that should not have reasonably provoked suspicion.
\u201c@Freeyourmindkid Not me but some new people moved in across the street from us. Shortly thereafter, they called the police on my brother for smoking a cigarette in the front yard of the house he\u2019d lived in since he was six years old (he was 19 at the time). #LivingWhileBlack\u201d— Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken (@Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken) 1524272435
\u201cSeriously, #Police MUST start issuing tickets - with fines - for calling police on people just #LivingWhileBlack.\nI am really sick of theses sotires - they are #Deplorable \nhttps://t.co/7U6YcYDEym\u201d— Dr. Bobby Sands (@Dr. Bobby Sands) 1527788127
"It is a crime to file a false police report," wrote Stacey Patton and Anthony Paul Farley in the Washington Post recently. "When places of public accommodation enlist the police to remove people based on race, the owners and managers should be investigated and prosecuted for filing false police reports. At the Philly Starbucks, the Yale dorm, the golf course, or the Oakland park, the police investigation should have focused on the frivolous and possibly criminal abuses of the 911 emergency system rather than on the people who were doing nothing wrong when someone called about them."
As of now, noted Patton and Farley, summoning the police to engage a black person who has simply made the caller "uncomfortable" carries few consequences for white people. Examination of the issue by lawmakers could bring about more understanding of potential solutions that could deter frivolous calls to the police.
"Right now, calling 911 on innocent black people is a costless form of indulgence in racialized fear--or worse, racist amusement," wrote Patton and Farley. "But lawsuits and publicity might make callers think twice and decrease the danger of false arrest and death."
Recent experiences of black Americans who have been harassed by neighbors and strangers have led a group to call for congressional hearings on racial profiling by companies as well as individuals.
"Over the last few years high profile cases of racial profiling that have turned deadly have made national headlines and prompted long-overdue calls for criminal justice reform and transparency," wrote the group. "It is within this focus, then, that we are calling on the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to hold a hearing on racial profiling."
The letter was signed by six people who have recently been targeted for calls to law enforcement while going about everyday activities.
Darren Martin was mistaken for an armed robber by one of his new neighbors while he was moving into an apartment in New York while Donisha Prendergast had a similar experience while loading suitcases into a car at a home she had rented. Lolade Siyonbola found herself showing her Yale student ID to police and explaining that she had every right to be on campus, after a classmate reported her for taking a nap in a common area in a dormitory.
"These egregious affronts on human rights, eerily reminiscent of some of the darkest chapters in our nation's history, are the sad reality for black people in America," the letter says.
Racial profiling has a long history in the U.S., the letter notes. But recent cases of kneejerk phone calls to the police have taken place amid widespread national coverage of police killings of unarmed black Americans.
"The domino effect that ensues from a racially-biased 911 call is a costly one, from the financial and time resources pulled from 911 operators to the protocol police officers must then follow," reads the letter. "By assuming an excessive response, which risks arrest, incarceration, and death, generations of black lives pay the ultimate cost. Holding false accusers accountable and examining protocol practices should be a focus of this hearing."
Recent high-profile cases of people calling the police on black community members also include that of a woman reporting two men barbecuing at a park in Oakland, Calif., an airline passenger reporting a woman whose arm was touching hers on a flight, and two men being handcuffed in a Starbucks after an employee called the police to report that they were sitting in the store. On social media, others have shared their own stories and some have argued that police should fine callers once it is determined that the person who a call was about was taking part in an activity that should not have reasonably provoked suspicion.
\u201c@Freeyourmindkid Not me but some new people moved in across the street from us. Shortly thereafter, they called the police on my brother for smoking a cigarette in the front yard of the house he\u2019d lived in since he was six years old (he was 19 at the time). #LivingWhileBlack\u201d— Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken (@Unbowed\ud83d\udc9bUnbent\ud83d\udc9bUnbroken) 1524272435
\u201cSeriously, #Police MUST start issuing tickets - with fines - for calling police on people just #LivingWhileBlack.\nI am really sick of theses sotires - they are #Deplorable \nhttps://t.co/7U6YcYDEym\u201d— Dr. Bobby Sands (@Dr. Bobby Sands) 1527788127
"It is a crime to file a false police report," wrote Stacey Patton and Anthony Paul Farley in the Washington Post recently. "When places of public accommodation enlist the police to remove people based on race, the owners and managers should be investigated and prosecuted for filing false police reports. At the Philly Starbucks, the Yale dorm, the golf course, or the Oakland park, the police investigation should have focused on the frivolous and possibly criminal abuses of the 911 emergency system rather than on the people who were doing nothing wrong when someone called about them."
As of now, noted Patton and Farley, summoning the police to engage a black person who has simply made the caller "uncomfortable" carries few consequences for white people. Examination of the issue by lawmakers could bring about more understanding of potential solutions that could deter frivolous calls to the police.
"Right now, calling 911 on innocent black people is a costless form of indulgence in racialized fear--or worse, racist amusement," wrote Patton and Farley. "But lawsuits and publicity might make callers think twice and decrease the danger of false arrest and death."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.