SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In an article published on Thursday, Folha--which has over 5.7 million followers on Facebook--noted that over the past several months it had begun to detect a sharp decline in interactions not just with its own Facebook posts, but with those of other major Brazilian newspapers as well. (Photo: Legal Loop)
Accusing Facebook of 'Effectively Banning Professional Journalism,' Brazil's Largest Paper Ditches Platform
Facebook has become "inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content," said Folha de S. Paulo's executive editor
Feb 09, 2018
Accusing Facebook of discriminating against "quality" content and accelerating the spread of "fake news" with its newly-unveiled algorithm, Brazil's largest newspaper Folha de S. Paulo--which boasts a print and online subscriber base of 285,000 people--has announced that it will no longer publish its articles on the social media platform.
"Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours."
--Sergio Davila, Folha de S. Paulo
"In effectively banning professional journalism from its pages in favor of personal content and opening space for 'fake news' to proliferate, Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours," Sergio Davila, Folha's executive editor, said in a statement.
In an article published on Thursday, Folha--which has over 5.7 million followers on Facebook--noted that over the past several months it had begun to detect a sharp decline in interactions not just with its own Facebook posts, but with those of other major Brazilian newspapers as well.
By contrast, the newspaper's analysis found, "fake news pages received five times the number of engagements that professional journalism received."
For this decline in engagement, Folha blamed Facebook's new algorithm, which the paper said "privilege[s] personal interaction contents, to the detriment of those distributed by companies, such as those that produce professional journalism."
"This reinforces the tendency of the user to consume more and more content with which it has affinity, favoring the creation of bubbles of opinions and convictions, and the propagation of fake news," Folha argued. "These problems have been aggravated in recent years by the mass distribution of deliberately false content...as happened in the U.S. presidential election in 2016."
The decision to abandon Facebook was ultimately "a reflection of internal discussions about the best ways to get the content of the newspaper to reach its readers," the paper concluded. "The disadvantages of using Facebook as a path to this distribution became more evident after the social network's decision to reduce the visibility of professional journalism on its users' pages."
Responding to Folha's move, Jeff Benicio, a columnist for the Brazilian news and entertainment website Terra, urged other organizations to do the same.
"Other news organizations should follow Folha de S. Paulo's footsteps," Benicio wrote. "If there's a mass exit, the social network will lose relevance and become...a virtual space for family and friends to joke around."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Accusing Facebook of discriminating against "quality" content and accelerating the spread of "fake news" with its newly-unveiled algorithm, Brazil's largest newspaper Folha de S. Paulo--which boasts a print and online subscriber base of 285,000 people--has announced that it will no longer publish its articles on the social media platform.
"Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours."
--Sergio Davila, Folha de S. Paulo
"In effectively banning professional journalism from its pages in favor of personal content and opening space for 'fake news' to proliferate, Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours," Sergio Davila, Folha's executive editor, said in a statement.
In an article published on Thursday, Folha--which has over 5.7 million followers on Facebook--noted that over the past several months it had begun to detect a sharp decline in interactions not just with its own Facebook posts, but with those of other major Brazilian newspapers as well.
By contrast, the newspaper's analysis found, "fake news pages received five times the number of engagements that professional journalism received."
For this decline in engagement, Folha blamed Facebook's new algorithm, which the paper said "privilege[s] personal interaction contents, to the detriment of those distributed by companies, such as those that produce professional journalism."
"This reinforces the tendency of the user to consume more and more content with which it has affinity, favoring the creation of bubbles of opinions and convictions, and the propagation of fake news," Folha argued. "These problems have been aggravated in recent years by the mass distribution of deliberately false content...as happened in the U.S. presidential election in 2016."
The decision to abandon Facebook was ultimately "a reflection of internal discussions about the best ways to get the content of the newspaper to reach its readers," the paper concluded. "The disadvantages of using Facebook as a path to this distribution became more evident after the social network's decision to reduce the visibility of professional journalism on its users' pages."
Responding to Folha's move, Jeff Benicio, a columnist for the Brazilian news and entertainment website Terra, urged other organizations to do the same.
"Other news organizations should follow Folha de S. Paulo's footsteps," Benicio wrote. "If there's a mass exit, the social network will lose relevance and become...a virtual space for family and friends to joke around."
Accusing Facebook of discriminating against "quality" content and accelerating the spread of "fake news" with its newly-unveiled algorithm, Brazil's largest newspaper Folha de S. Paulo--which boasts a print and online subscriber base of 285,000 people--has announced that it will no longer publish its articles on the social media platform.
"Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours."
--Sergio Davila, Folha de S. Paulo
"In effectively banning professional journalism from its pages in favor of personal content and opening space for 'fake news' to proliferate, Facebook became inhospitable terrain for those who want to offer quality content like ours," Sergio Davila, Folha's executive editor, said in a statement.
In an article published on Thursday, Folha--which has over 5.7 million followers on Facebook--noted that over the past several months it had begun to detect a sharp decline in interactions not just with its own Facebook posts, but with those of other major Brazilian newspapers as well.
By contrast, the newspaper's analysis found, "fake news pages received five times the number of engagements that professional journalism received."
For this decline in engagement, Folha blamed Facebook's new algorithm, which the paper said "privilege[s] personal interaction contents, to the detriment of those distributed by companies, such as those that produce professional journalism."
"This reinforces the tendency of the user to consume more and more content with which it has affinity, favoring the creation of bubbles of opinions and convictions, and the propagation of fake news," Folha argued. "These problems have been aggravated in recent years by the mass distribution of deliberately false content...as happened in the U.S. presidential election in 2016."
The decision to abandon Facebook was ultimately "a reflection of internal discussions about the best ways to get the content of the newspaper to reach its readers," the paper concluded. "The disadvantages of using Facebook as a path to this distribution became more evident after the social network's decision to reduce the visibility of professional journalism on its users' pages."
Responding to Folha's move, Jeff Benicio, a columnist for the Brazilian news and entertainment website Terra, urged other organizations to do the same.
"Other news organizations should follow Folha de S. Paulo's footsteps," Benicio wrote. "If there's a mass exit, the social network will lose relevance and become...a virtual space for family and friends to joke around."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.