

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. (Photo: Janai Nelson/Twitter)
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."
After the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an attempt by the Pennsylvania GOP to restore the state's "insanely gerrymandered" congressional map on Monday, one Republican decided that the next rational course of action would be to launch an impeachment campaign against the five state justices who deemed the map unconstitutional--a move critics denounced as a "remarkable" attempt to subvert democracy.
"Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
--Stephen Wolf
The effort was spearheaded by Republican Pennsylvania state Rep. Cris Dush, who sent a memo attacking the state Supreme Court's 5-2 ruling last month that said the GOP-drawn districts "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violate the state constitution. Many analysts agreed with this interpretation, calling the map one of the most extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation.
Instead of obeying the court's order to redraw the map ahead of the 2018 midterms, Dush on Monday urged his colleagues to co-sponsor legislation to remove the five Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices who struck down the map.
"The five justices who signed this order that blatantly and clearly contradicts the plain language of the Pennsylvania constitution, engaged in misbehavior in office. Wherefore, each is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office and disqualification to hold any office or trust or profit under this Commonwealth."
While experts characterized the Pennsylvania GOP's legal arguments for restoring the gerrymandered map as "frivolous," many reacted with alarm to Dush's memo, calling it a "serious threat" because Republicans--thanks to aggressive gerrymandering--hold a strong majority in the state legislature.
"This is a dangerous disregard for the rule of law by Pennsylvania Republicans," voting rights expert Stephen Wolf argued on Twitter Monday. "Impeaching judges because one disagrees with a court decision that strengthened democracy is a classic move of authoritarian regimes."
Other commentators expressed their agreement with Wolf, calling the impeachment push further evidence that "the Republican Party does not believe in democracy."