SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
People hold signs during a rally to call for 'An End to Partisan Gerrymandering' at the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Leigh Vogel/Getty Images)
Supreme Court Blocks Pennsylvania GOP's Attempt to Restore Gerrymandered Map for 2018
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation—something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
Feb 05, 2018
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy