SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
People hold signs during a rally to call for 'An End to Partisan Gerrymandering' at the Supreme Court of the United States in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Leigh Vogel/Getty Images)
Supreme Court Blocks Pennsylvania GOP's Attempt to Restore Gerrymandered Map for 2018
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation—something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
Feb 05, 2018
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
In a victory for voting rights and a blow to GOP efforts to aggressively manipulate congressional districts in their favor, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' attempt to restore a gerrymandered map that "clearly, plainly, and palpably" violated the state's constitution.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place."
-- Karen Hobert Flynn, Common Cause
If Republicans had been successful, their map--characterized by analysts as one of the more extreme partisan gerrymanders in the nation--would have remained in place for the 2018 midterms.
But the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania high court ruling requiring lawmakers to redraw the state's congressional districts by February 9 "effectively ensures" a fairer map in 2018, creating an opening for a wave of Democratic victories.
As Pema Levy of Mother Jones notes, "Republicans won 13 of Pennsylvania's 18 congressional seats in November 2016, even though voters statewide were roughly evenly split between Democrats and Republicans."
In a sign of how "frivolous" Pennsylvania Republicans' arguments were for upholding their previous map, conservative Justice Samuel Alito denied the request for a stay on his own, not even bothering to refer the case to the full court.
"The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the fundamental right of Pennsylvanians to fair representation--something they have been denied since this gerrymandered map was put in place," Karen Hobert Flynn, president of Common Cause, declared in a statement on Monday in response to news of the court's decision.
"We can now move forward with restoring the confidence to voters that for the first time this decade votes cast will be in constitutional and not gerrymandered districts," added Micah Sims, executive director of Common Cause Pennsylvania. "Democracy has been preserved and the march continues towards votes having meaning and Pennsylvanians having a voice and representation in Washington."
Pennsylvania is just one of several states where Republicans have used large majorities to entrench their dominance by drawing congressional lines that favor their party.
And they have often been quite explicit about their intentions.
"I acknowledge freely that this would be a political gerrymander," Rep. David Lewis (R-N.C.), chairman of the North Carolina State House's Redistricting Committee, said in 2016, when the state was redrawing maps that were previously struck down for racial gerrymandering. "I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats. So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
As Common Dreams reported, a federal court last month deemed North Carolina's 2016 map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
In a Twitter thread on Monday, Common Cause listed several crucial upcoming cases challenging state district lines, as well as grassroots efforts to "end gerrymandering once and for all."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy