SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Immigration activists, including U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) (C), stage a protest on the steps of the U.S. Capitol December 6, 2017 in Washington, DC. Activists urged the Congress to pass a clean Dream Act and protect Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries before the end of the year. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
After New Trump Demand for $25 Billion Wall, Lawmaker Says Cheaper to Build Giant Statue of Middle Finger Aimed at Latin America
"Both a wall and the statue," argues Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.), "would be equally offensive and equally ineffective and both would express Trump's deeply held suspicion of Latinos."
Jan 26, 2018
Following an immigration deal put forth by the Trump administration late Thursday--one which demands $25 billion for a wall and another $5 billion for increased militarization of the border--progressives said the proposal was "dead on arrival," nothing but a "racist ransom note," and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) suggested it would be "far cheaper to erect a 50-foot concrete statue of a middle finger and point it towards Latin America."
Trump, added Gutierrez, "can't be trusted to keep his word or maintain position for more than a couple of hours. Every time hardliners inside and outside White House shift his position, we get farther from a deal to serve the will the American people to give Dreamers a way to live here legally."
Though Trump has said he wants to cut a deal that would protect Dreamers--residents without citizenship who were brought to the U.S. as children--the proposal the White House floated to reporters on Thursday contains a goody bag of hard-line, anti-immigration policies of the kind pushed by Trump advisor Stephen Miller and chief of staff John Kelly. It includes severe cuts to family-based migration policies, termination of the diversity visa program, and more funding for ramped up deportations.
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note." --Greisa Martinez Rosas, United We Dream
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note," said Greisa Martinez Rosas, advocacy director for United We Dream, which is calling for passage of a "clean" Dream Act and a deal in which undocumented youth are not used as "bargaining chips" to push an unproductive far-right and xenophobic set of immigration policies.
"Trump and Stephen Miller killed DACA and created the crisis that immigrant youth are facing," Rosas continued. "They have taken immigrant youth hostage, pitting us against our own parents, Black immigrants and our communities in exchange for our dignity. To Miller and Trump's white supremacist proposal, immigrant youth say: No."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also said the deal was a non-starter and should be rejected:
MoveOn.org, meanwhile, called the proposal a "bill of cruelty" that would do nothing but hold Dreamers hostage and should be "dead on arrival" if a version of it comes to Congress.
"Trump's proposal seeks to hold the futures of 800,000 Dreamers hostage in order to deport their loved ones and waste taxpayer money on the wall he promised Mexico would pay for," said Anna Galland, executive director of MoveOn.org Civic Action, in a statement.
"Remember," Galland added, "it's Trump who unilaterally chose to rescind DACA. If he cared about Dreamers, Trump could unilaterally decide to keep it in place. Despite saying he would deal with Dreamers with 'great heart,' he has proven time and again that he is more concerned about ticking off the items on John Kelly, Stephen Miller, and the nativist movement's deportation agenda."
And Rosas offered this message to lawmakers in Congress: "Let us be clear: any politician who backs up this ransom note is enabling Trump and Miller's white supremacist agenda. Members of Congress of conscience must make the moral choice to reject this white supremacist proposal and pass legislation that protects us without harming others. Dream Act now."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following an immigration deal put forth by the Trump administration late Thursday--one which demands $25 billion for a wall and another $5 billion for increased militarization of the border--progressives said the proposal was "dead on arrival," nothing but a "racist ransom note," and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) suggested it would be "far cheaper to erect a 50-foot concrete statue of a middle finger and point it towards Latin America."
Trump, added Gutierrez, "can't be trusted to keep his word or maintain position for more than a couple of hours. Every time hardliners inside and outside White House shift his position, we get farther from a deal to serve the will the American people to give Dreamers a way to live here legally."
Though Trump has said he wants to cut a deal that would protect Dreamers--residents without citizenship who were brought to the U.S. as children--the proposal the White House floated to reporters on Thursday contains a goody bag of hard-line, anti-immigration policies of the kind pushed by Trump advisor Stephen Miller and chief of staff John Kelly. It includes severe cuts to family-based migration policies, termination of the diversity visa program, and more funding for ramped up deportations.
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note." --Greisa Martinez Rosas, United We Dream
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note," said Greisa Martinez Rosas, advocacy director for United We Dream, which is calling for passage of a "clean" Dream Act and a deal in which undocumented youth are not used as "bargaining chips" to push an unproductive far-right and xenophobic set of immigration policies.
"Trump and Stephen Miller killed DACA and created the crisis that immigrant youth are facing," Rosas continued. "They have taken immigrant youth hostage, pitting us against our own parents, Black immigrants and our communities in exchange for our dignity. To Miller and Trump's white supremacist proposal, immigrant youth say: No."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also said the deal was a non-starter and should be rejected:
MoveOn.org, meanwhile, called the proposal a "bill of cruelty" that would do nothing but hold Dreamers hostage and should be "dead on arrival" if a version of it comes to Congress.
"Trump's proposal seeks to hold the futures of 800,000 Dreamers hostage in order to deport their loved ones and waste taxpayer money on the wall he promised Mexico would pay for," said Anna Galland, executive director of MoveOn.org Civic Action, in a statement.
"Remember," Galland added, "it's Trump who unilaterally chose to rescind DACA. If he cared about Dreamers, Trump could unilaterally decide to keep it in place. Despite saying he would deal with Dreamers with 'great heart,' he has proven time and again that he is more concerned about ticking off the items on John Kelly, Stephen Miller, and the nativist movement's deportation agenda."
And Rosas offered this message to lawmakers in Congress: "Let us be clear: any politician who backs up this ransom note is enabling Trump and Miller's white supremacist agenda. Members of Congress of conscience must make the moral choice to reject this white supremacist proposal and pass legislation that protects us without harming others. Dream Act now."
Following an immigration deal put forth by the Trump administration late Thursday--one which demands $25 billion for a wall and another $5 billion for increased militarization of the border--progressives said the proposal was "dead on arrival," nothing but a "racist ransom note," and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) suggested it would be "far cheaper to erect a 50-foot concrete statue of a middle finger and point it towards Latin America."
Trump, added Gutierrez, "can't be trusted to keep his word or maintain position for more than a couple of hours. Every time hardliners inside and outside White House shift his position, we get farther from a deal to serve the will the American people to give Dreamers a way to live here legally."
Though Trump has said he wants to cut a deal that would protect Dreamers--residents without citizenship who were brought to the U.S. as children--the proposal the White House floated to reporters on Thursday contains a goody bag of hard-line, anti-immigration policies of the kind pushed by Trump advisor Stephen Miller and chief of staff John Kelly. It includes severe cuts to family-based migration policies, termination of the diversity visa program, and more funding for ramped up deportations.
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note." --Greisa Martinez Rosas, United We Dream
"Let's call this proposal for what it is: a white supremacist ransom note," said Greisa Martinez Rosas, advocacy director for United We Dream, which is calling for passage of a "clean" Dream Act and a deal in which undocumented youth are not used as "bargaining chips" to push an unproductive far-right and xenophobic set of immigration policies.
"Trump and Stephen Miller killed DACA and created the crisis that immigrant youth are facing," Rosas continued. "They have taken immigrant youth hostage, pitting us against our own parents, Black immigrants and our communities in exchange for our dignity. To Miller and Trump's white supremacist proposal, immigrant youth say: No."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also said the deal was a non-starter and should be rejected:
MoveOn.org, meanwhile, called the proposal a "bill of cruelty" that would do nothing but hold Dreamers hostage and should be "dead on arrival" if a version of it comes to Congress.
"Trump's proposal seeks to hold the futures of 800,000 Dreamers hostage in order to deport their loved ones and waste taxpayer money on the wall he promised Mexico would pay for," said Anna Galland, executive director of MoveOn.org Civic Action, in a statement.
"Remember," Galland added, "it's Trump who unilaterally chose to rescind DACA. If he cared about Dreamers, Trump could unilaterally decide to keep it in place. Despite saying he would deal with Dreamers with 'great heart,' he has proven time and again that he is more concerned about ticking off the items on John Kelly, Stephen Miller, and the nativist movement's deportation agenda."
And Rosas offered this message to lawmakers in Congress: "Let us be clear: any politician who backs up this ransom note is enabling Trump and Miller's white supremacist agenda. Members of Congress of conscience must make the moral choice to reject this white supremacist proposal and pass legislation that protects us without harming others. Dream Act now."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.