

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

President Donald Trump's war on workers has spawned a number of disastrous policy moves, from cuts to federal employees' pay increases to directives making it harder for workers to unionize. But one of the "nastiest" policy shifts Trump is pursuing is a rule that would allow companies to steal their employees' tips--which, according to a new report, would cost workers $5.8 billion a year.
Published by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) on Wednesday, the analysis also details the disproportionate impact the proposed rule would have on women, whose tips would account for nearly 80 percent--$4.6 billion--of the total stolen by employers.
By contrast, the "tip stealing" rule--introduced by the Department of Labor in December--"would be a windfall to restaurant owners and other employers," who would essentially have total control over workers' tips, as long as they pay the minimum wage, EPI finds.
While EPI notes that employers would have the option to redistribute the tips to "'back of the house' workers like dishwashers and cooks," they would not be required to do so.
"Employers would be no more likely to share tips with back-of-the-house workers than they would be to make any other choice about what to do with a business windfall, including using the money to make capital improvements to their establishments, to increase executive pay, or to line their own pockets," EPI's report notes.
"Instead of giving workers a badly needed boost to their paycheck, the Trump administration is actively making it legal to steal tips from working people," Heidi Shierholz, EPI's director of policy, concluded in a statement on Wednesday.
With the rule's public comment period ending in just over two weeks, activists urged Americans to flood the Department of Labor with outrage that could help set the stage for future lawsuits.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

President Donald Trump's war on workers has spawned a number of disastrous policy moves, from cuts to federal employees' pay increases to directives making it harder for workers to unionize. But one of the "nastiest" policy shifts Trump is pursuing is a rule that would allow companies to steal their employees' tips--which, according to a new report, would cost workers $5.8 billion a year.
Published by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) on Wednesday, the analysis also details the disproportionate impact the proposed rule would have on women, whose tips would account for nearly 80 percent--$4.6 billion--of the total stolen by employers.
By contrast, the "tip stealing" rule--introduced by the Department of Labor in December--"would be a windfall to restaurant owners and other employers," who would essentially have total control over workers' tips, as long as they pay the minimum wage, EPI finds.
While EPI notes that employers would have the option to redistribute the tips to "'back of the house' workers like dishwashers and cooks," they would not be required to do so.
"Employers would be no more likely to share tips with back-of-the-house workers than they would be to make any other choice about what to do with a business windfall, including using the money to make capital improvements to their establishments, to increase executive pay, or to line their own pockets," EPI's report notes.
"Instead of giving workers a badly needed boost to their paycheck, the Trump administration is actively making it legal to steal tips from working people," Heidi Shierholz, EPI's director of policy, concluded in a statement on Wednesday.
With the rule's public comment period ending in just over two weeks, activists urged Americans to flood the Department of Labor with outrage that could help set the stage for future lawsuits.

President Donald Trump's war on workers has spawned a number of disastrous policy moves, from cuts to federal employees' pay increases to directives making it harder for workers to unionize. But one of the "nastiest" policy shifts Trump is pursuing is a rule that would allow companies to steal their employees' tips--which, according to a new report, would cost workers $5.8 billion a year.
Published by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) on Wednesday, the analysis also details the disproportionate impact the proposed rule would have on women, whose tips would account for nearly 80 percent--$4.6 billion--of the total stolen by employers.
By contrast, the "tip stealing" rule--introduced by the Department of Labor in December--"would be a windfall to restaurant owners and other employers," who would essentially have total control over workers' tips, as long as they pay the minimum wage, EPI finds.
While EPI notes that employers would have the option to redistribute the tips to "'back of the house' workers like dishwashers and cooks," they would not be required to do so.
"Employers would be no more likely to share tips with back-of-the-house workers than they would be to make any other choice about what to do with a business windfall, including using the money to make capital improvements to their establishments, to increase executive pay, or to line their own pockets," EPI's report notes.
"Instead of giving workers a badly needed boost to their paycheck, the Trump administration is actively making it legal to steal tips from working people," Heidi Shierholz, EPI's director of policy, concluded in a statement on Wednesday.
With the rule's public comment period ending in just over two weeks, activists urged Americans to flood the Department of Labor with outrage that could help set the stage for future lawsuits.