

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"The concentration levels of Ruthenium-106 in the air that have been recorded in Europe and especially in France are of no consequence for human health and for the environment," France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety concluded in a press release. (Photo: Masterbutler/Flickr/cc)
An upsurge in radioactive pollution detected over Europe in recent weeks is likely the result of an accident at a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan, France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) said in a new report.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening? The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."
--Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
The radioactive plume--composed of Ruthenium-106--was detected "in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries" beginning late in September, IRSN observed.
While the detection of Ruthenium initially sparked concerns of food contamination, officials claimed that public health is not at risk.
"The concentration levels of Ruthenium-106 in the air that have been recorded in Europe and especially in France are of no consequence for human health and for the environment," the agency concluded in a press release.
IRSN also ruled out "the possibility of an accident on a nuclear power plant, which would result in the presence of other radionuclides," suggesting that the material likely originated from a radioactive medicine center or nuclear fuel treatment site.
The precise point of release is also not known. IRSN suggested that "the most plausible zone of release lies between the Volga and the Urals," and published a map detailing its findings.

Jean-Marc Peres, the director of IRSN, told Reuters that "Russian authorities have said they are not aware of an accident on their territory." Peres added that he has not been in contact with Kazakh officials.
Though authorities insisted that the nuclear plume was "harmless," IRSN's report was still met with alarm.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening?" the U.K.-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament wrote in response to the report. "The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An upsurge in radioactive pollution detected over Europe in recent weeks is likely the result of an accident at a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan, France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) said in a new report.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening? The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."
--Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
The radioactive plume--composed of Ruthenium-106--was detected "in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries" beginning late in September, IRSN observed.
While the detection of Ruthenium initially sparked concerns of food contamination, officials claimed that public health is not at risk.
"The concentration levels of Ruthenium-106 in the air that have been recorded in Europe and especially in France are of no consequence for human health and for the environment," the agency concluded in a press release.
IRSN also ruled out "the possibility of an accident on a nuclear power plant, which would result in the presence of other radionuclides," suggesting that the material likely originated from a radioactive medicine center or nuclear fuel treatment site.
The precise point of release is also not known. IRSN suggested that "the most plausible zone of release lies between the Volga and the Urals," and published a map detailing its findings.

Jean-Marc Peres, the director of IRSN, told Reuters that "Russian authorities have said they are not aware of an accident on their territory." Peres added that he has not been in contact with Kazakh officials.
Though authorities insisted that the nuclear plume was "harmless," IRSN's report was still met with alarm.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening?" the U.K.-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament wrote in response to the report. "The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."
An upsurge in radioactive pollution detected over Europe in recent weeks is likely the result of an accident at a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan, France's Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) said in a new report.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening? The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."
--Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
The radioactive plume--composed of Ruthenium-106--was detected "in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries" beginning late in September, IRSN observed.
While the detection of Ruthenium initially sparked concerns of food contamination, officials claimed that public health is not at risk.
"The concentration levels of Ruthenium-106 in the air that have been recorded in Europe and especially in France are of no consequence for human health and for the environment," the agency concluded in a press release.
IRSN also ruled out "the possibility of an accident on a nuclear power plant, which would result in the presence of other radionuclides," suggesting that the material likely originated from a radioactive medicine center or nuclear fuel treatment site.
The precise point of release is also not known. IRSN suggested that "the most plausible zone of release lies between the Volga and the Urals," and published a map detailing its findings.

Jean-Marc Peres, the director of IRSN, told Reuters that "Russian authorities have said they are not aware of an accident on their territory." Peres added that he has not been in contact with Kazakh officials.
Though authorities insisted that the nuclear plume was "harmless," IRSN's report was still met with alarm.
"There's no need for nuclear power, so why do we allow these accidents to keep happening?" the U.K.-based Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament wrote in response to the report. "The next one could be another Fukushima or Chernobyl."