SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Because of Trump's pervasive regulatory conflicts, any attempt by the administration to gut public protections should be preceded by a detailed and thorough accounting of how such actions will impact the president and his business interests," the new analysis concludes. (Photo: Mike Maguire/Flickr/cc)
As Trump Pushes Massive Deregulatory Agenda, One Key Beneficiary: Donald Trump
"Trump's refusal to cede ownership of his businesses means the president can personally profit from gutting environmental, worker, health, and financial protections."
Oct 11, 2017
As President Donald Trump and his cabinet move aggressively to implement their far-reaching and "potentially devastating" deregulatory agenda--slashing everything from environmental rules protecting the public water supply to labor standards shielding workers from harmful chemicals--many have begun to loudly raise the all-important question: who benefits? According to a Public Citizen report unveiled Wednesday, the answer in many cases is Trump himself.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing. He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
--Rep. David Cicilline
Authored by Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool and Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the new analysis finds that "Trump's flurry of deregulatory policies and executive orders--especially his unconstitutional 'one in, two out' order--all point to one goal: allowing reckless corporations to regulate themselves, a model that has been spectacularly unsuccessful in the past."
"Meanwhile," Claypool and Cicilline add, "Trump's refusal to cede ownership of his businesses means the president can personally profit from gutting environmental, worker, health, and financial protections."
The report examines a total of six cases in which Trump's decision to slash a particular rule or public safeguard could ultimately be profitable for his vast business empire at the expense of workers and the environment.
Among the examples spotlighted are:
- The EPA's proposal to repeal the Clean Water Rule, which would impose higher compliance costs on a wide variety of businesses, including golf courses ("Trump owns 12 golf courses in the U.S. that could be affected by the drinking water rule," the report notes);
- The Trump administration's elimination of the Obama Labor Department's expansion of overtime pay to cover employees who earn up to $47,400 a year, which would have benefited many of Trump's tens of thousands of employees; and
- EPA chief Scott Pruitt's decision to halt a planned ban on the toxic pesticide chlorpyrifos (which was supposed to take effect March 31, 2017), which is frequently used by golf courses.
Also examined are broader areas of concern, particularly Trump's sweeping proposal to overhaul the U.S. tax code and deliver massive benefits to the wealthiest Americans, the largest corporations, himself, and his family.
"If Trump's net worth is $3.5 billion, as has been reported, Trump's heirs would benefit from an estate tax repeal by at least $857 million," the analysis notes.
Claypool and Cicilline conclude their report by arguing for higher standards of government transparency, particularly for an administration awash in scandals and conflicts of interest.
"The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
--Public Citizen"Because of Trump's pervasive regulatory conflicts, any attempt by the administration to gut public protections should be preceded by a detailed and thorough accounting of how such actions will impact the president and his business interests," the report concludes. "The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
Public Citizen released the new analysis to coincide with Rep. Cicilline's introduction of the DRAIN the Swamp Act, which would require federal officials to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before they can carry out changes to the regulatory system.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing," Cicilline concluded. "He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As President Donald Trump and his cabinet move aggressively to implement their far-reaching and "potentially devastating" deregulatory agenda--slashing everything from environmental rules protecting the public water supply to labor standards shielding workers from harmful chemicals--many have begun to loudly raise the all-important question: who benefits? According to a Public Citizen report unveiled Wednesday, the answer in many cases is Trump himself.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing. He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
--Rep. David Cicilline
Authored by Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool and Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the new analysis finds that "Trump's flurry of deregulatory policies and executive orders--especially his unconstitutional 'one in, two out' order--all point to one goal: allowing reckless corporations to regulate themselves, a model that has been spectacularly unsuccessful in the past."
"Meanwhile," Claypool and Cicilline add, "Trump's refusal to cede ownership of his businesses means the president can personally profit from gutting environmental, worker, health, and financial protections."
The report examines a total of six cases in which Trump's decision to slash a particular rule or public safeguard could ultimately be profitable for his vast business empire at the expense of workers and the environment.
Among the examples spotlighted are:
- The EPA's proposal to repeal the Clean Water Rule, which would impose higher compliance costs on a wide variety of businesses, including golf courses ("Trump owns 12 golf courses in the U.S. that could be affected by the drinking water rule," the report notes);
- The Trump administration's elimination of the Obama Labor Department's expansion of overtime pay to cover employees who earn up to $47,400 a year, which would have benefited many of Trump's tens of thousands of employees; and
- EPA chief Scott Pruitt's decision to halt a planned ban on the toxic pesticide chlorpyrifos (which was supposed to take effect March 31, 2017), which is frequently used by golf courses.
Also examined are broader areas of concern, particularly Trump's sweeping proposal to overhaul the U.S. tax code and deliver massive benefits to the wealthiest Americans, the largest corporations, himself, and his family.
"If Trump's net worth is $3.5 billion, as has been reported, Trump's heirs would benefit from an estate tax repeal by at least $857 million," the analysis notes.
Claypool and Cicilline conclude their report by arguing for higher standards of government transparency, particularly for an administration awash in scandals and conflicts of interest.
"The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
--Public Citizen"Because of Trump's pervasive regulatory conflicts, any attempt by the administration to gut public protections should be preceded by a detailed and thorough accounting of how such actions will impact the president and his business interests," the report concludes. "The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
Public Citizen released the new analysis to coincide with Rep. Cicilline's introduction of the DRAIN the Swamp Act, which would require federal officials to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before they can carry out changes to the regulatory system.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing," Cicilline concluded. "He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
As President Donald Trump and his cabinet move aggressively to implement their far-reaching and "potentially devastating" deregulatory agenda--slashing everything from environmental rules protecting the public water supply to labor standards shielding workers from harmful chemicals--many have begun to loudly raise the all-important question: who benefits? According to a Public Citizen report unveiled Wednesday, the answer in many cases is Trump himself.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing. He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
--Rep. David Cicilline
Authored by Public Citizen research director Rick Claypool and Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the new analysis finds that "Trump's flurry of deregulatory policies and executive orders--especially his unconstitutional 'one in, two out' order--all point to one goal: allowing reckless corporations to regulate themselves, a model that has been spectacularly unsuccessful in the past."
"Meanwhile," Claypool and Cicilline add, "Trump's refusal to cede ownership of his businesses means the president can personally profit from gutting environmental, worker, health, and financial protections."
The report examines a total of six cases in which Trump's decision to slash a particular rule or public safeguard could ultimately be profitable for his vast business empire at the expense of workers and the environment.
Among the examples spotlighted are:
- The EPA's proposal to repeal the Clean Water Rule, which would impose higher compliance costs on a wide variety of businesses, including golf courses ("Trump owns 12 golf courses in the U.S. that could be affected by the drinking water rule," the report notes);
- The Trump administration's elimination of the Obama Labor Department's expansion of overtime pay to cover employees who earn up to $47,400 a year, which would have benefited many of Trump's tens of thousands of employees; and
- EPA chief Scott Pruitt's decision to halt a planned ban on the toxic pesticide chlorpyrifos (which was supposed to take effect March 31, 2017), which is frequently used by golf courses.
Also examined are broader areas of concern, particularly Trump's sweeping proposal to overhaul the U.S. tax code and deliver massive benefits to the wealthiest Americans, the largest corporations, himself, and his family.
"If Trump's net worth is $3.5 billion, as has been reported, Trump's heirs would benefit from an estate tax repeal by at least $857 million," the analysis notes.
Claypool and Cicilline conclude their report by arguing for higher standards of government transparency, particularly for an administration awash in scandals and conflicts of interest.
"The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
--Public Citizen"Because of Trump's pervasive regulatory conflicts, any attempt by the administration to gut public protections should be preceded by a detailed and thorough accounting of how such actions will impact the president and his business interests," the report concludes. "The public deserves to be informed about how the president stands to gain when his administration and legislators call for axing protections that improve and protect American lives."
Public Citizen released the new analysis to coincide with Rep. Cicilline's introduction of the DRAIN the Swamp Act, which would require federal officials to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before they can carry out changes to the regulatory system.
"Trump promised to drain the swamp, but that's not what he's doing," Cicilline concluded. "He's undermining regulations in order to benefit himself, his family, and his close friends."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.