SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Belongings are scattered and left behind at the site of the mass shooting at the Route 91 Harvest Festival, October 3, 2017 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
To 'Inflict Maximum Carnage,' Vegas Gunman Exploited Bump Stock Loophole
"I don't know anybody who goes deer hunting that needs to retrofit a gun to fire hundreds of rounds per minute. It's to slaughter people."
Oct 04, 2017
Following the massacre in Las Vegas that left at least 59 dead and more than 500 wounded, lawmakers and gun control advocates are honing in on one component of gunman Stephen Paddock's massive stock of weapons that allowed him to effectively convert semi-automatic rifles into rapid-fire machine guns--a cheap, accessible, and perfectly legal firearm modification device known as a "bump stock."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute and inflict maximum carnage."
--Sen. Dianne FeinsteinInvestigators have said that 12 of the 47 guns found in Paddock's hotel suite were equipped with bump stocks, which enable rifles to fire hundreds of rounds per minute. While gun advocates have defended the legality of bump stocks on the grounds that they are merely "range toys" used for "fun" and "entertainment," lawmakers and supporters of stronger gun control measures have denounced the attachment as a "loophole" that allows gunmen like Paddock to commit massacres.
"I don't know anybody who goes deer hunting that needs to retrofit a gun to fire hundreds of rounds per minute," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, (D-Mo.) on Tuesday. "It's to slaughter people."
As the New York Times notes, "replacing a standard rifle stock, the part that rests against the shoulder, with a bump stock allows a semiautomatic rifle to fire at a rate comparable to a fully automatic rifle--much faster than a human user can pull and release the trigger."
"The shooter does not move the trigger finger; instead, the weapon bounces, or 'bumps,' rapidly between shoulder and finger," the Times added.
While it is unclear which of the rifles Paddock used to carry out the Vegas massacre, the machine gun-like sound reported by witnesses and heard in videos of the shooting have led many to revive calls for an outright ban on bump stocks and similar attachments.
In 2013, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) pushed for such a ban, but her proposal ultimately went nowhere.
Following Sunday's shooting, Feinstein reiterated the need for a bump stock ban, arguing that lawmakers should be working urgently to "close this ridiculous loophole for good."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute--the rate of automatic weapons--and inflict maximum carnage," Feinstein wrote on Twitter Tuesday night. "I'm looking at ways to proceed with legislation to ban bump fire stocks...Doing nothing in the wake of this tragedy is not an option."
"I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
-- Washington Gov. Jay InsleeWashington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) joined Feinstein in calling for a ban on bump stocks and "other devices that turn legal semi-automatic firearms into lethal fully-automatic machine guns" in a statement on Tuesday.
"We must make sure people intent on causing mass destruction and loss of life won't be aided by lax laws that give them unfettered access to military-style weaponry," Inslee concluded. "To those who say we can't talk about machine gun massacres right after the massacre: I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
Gun control advocates have joined this growing chorus of lawmakers, demanding more than thoughts and prayers.
"Hardware that turns legal guns into automatic weapons should be prohibited," Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, wrote on Tuesday. "Automatic weapons are highly regulated; this evades federal law."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Following the massacre in Las Vegas that left at least 59 dead and more than 500 wounded, lawmakers and gun control advocates are honing in on one component of gunman Stephen Paddock's massive stock of weapons that allowed him to effectively convert semi-automatic rifles into rapid-fire machine guns--a cheap, accessible, and perfectly legal firearm modification device known as a "bump stock."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute and inflict maximum carnage."
--Sen. Dianne FeinsteinInvestigators have said that 12 of the 47 guns found in Paddock's hotel suite were equipped with bump stocks, which enable rifles to fire hundreds of rounds per minute. While gun advocates have defended the legality of bump stocks on the grounds that they are merely "range toys" used for "fun" and "entertainment," lawmakers and supporters of stronger gun control measures have denounced the attachment as a "loophole" that allows gunmen like Paddock to commit massacres.
"I don't know anybody who goes deer hunting that needs to retrofit a gun to fire hundreds of rounds per minute," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, (D-Mo.) on Tuesday. "It's to slaughter people."
As the New York Times notes, "replacing a standard rifle stock, the part that rests against the shoulder, with a bump stock allows a semiautomatic rifle to fire at a rate comparable to a fully automatic rifle--much faster than a human user can pull and release the trigger."
"The shooter does not move the trigger finger; instead, the weapon bounces, or 'bumps,' rapidly between shoulder and finger," the Times added.
While it is unclear which of the rifles Paddock used to carry out the Vegas massacre, the machine gun-like sound reported by witnesses and heard in videos of the shooting have led many to revive calls for an outright ban on bump stocks and similar attachments.
In 2013, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) pushed for such a ban, but her proposal ultimately went nowhere.
Following Sunday's shooting, Feinstein reiterated the need for a bump stock ban, arguing that lawmakers should be working urgently to "close this ridiculous loophole for good."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute--the rate of automatic weapons--and inflict maximum carnage," Feinstein wrote on Twitter Tuesday night. "I'm looking at ways to proceed with legislation to ban bump fire stocks...Doing nothing in the wake of this tragedy is not an option."
"I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
-- Washington Gov. Jay InsleeWashington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) joined Feinstein in calling for a ban on bump stocks and "other devices that turn legal semi-automatic firearms into lethal fully-automatic machine guns" in a statement on Tuesday.
"We must make sure people intent on causing mass destruction and loss of life won't be aided by lax laws that give them unfettered access to military-style weaponry," Inslee concluded. "To those who say we can't talk about machine gun massacres right after the massacre: I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
Gun control advocates have joined this growing chorus of lawmakers, demanding more than thoughts and prayers.
"Hardware that turns legal guns into automatic weapons should be prohibited," Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, wrote on Tuesday. "Automatic weapons are highly regulated; this evades federal law."
Following the massacre in Las Vegas that left at least 59 dead and more than 500 wounded, lawmakers and gun control advocates are honing in on one component of gunman Stephen Paddock's massive stock of weapons that allowed him to effectively convert semi-automatic rifles into rapid-fire machine guns--a cheap, accessible, and perfectly legal firearm modification device known as a "bump stock."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute and inflict maximum carnage."
--Sen. Dianne FeinsteinInvestigators have said that 12 of the 47 guns found in Paddock's hotel suite were equipped with bump stocks, which enable rifles to fire hundreds of rounds per minute. While gun advocates have defended the legality of bump stocks on the grounds that they are merely "range toys" used for "fun" and "entertainment," lawmakers and supporters of stronger gun control measures have denounced the attachment as a "loophole" that allows gunmen like Paddock to commit massacres.
"I don't know anybody who goes deer hunting that needs to retrofit a gun to fire hundreds of rounds per minute," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, (D-Mo.) on Tuesday. "It's to slaughter people."
As the New York Times notes, "replacing a standard rifle stock, the part that rests against the shoulder, with a bump stock allows a semiautomatic rifle to fire at a rate comparable to a fully automatic rifle--much faster than a human user can pull and release the trigger."
"The shooter does not move the trigger finger; instead, the weapon bounces, or 'bumps,' rapidly between shoulder and finger," the Times added.
While it is unclear which of the rifles Paddock used to carry out the Vegas massacre, the machine gun-like sound reported by witnesses and heard in videos of the shooting have led many to revive calls for an outright ban on bump stocks and similar attachments.
In 2013, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) pushed for such a ban, but her proposal ultimately went nowhere.
Following Sunday's shooting, Feinstein reiterated the need for a bump stock ban, arguing that lawmakers should be working urgently to "close this ridiculous loophole for good."
"Automatic weapons are illegal, but individuals are still able to purchase bump stocks to allow semi-automatic weapons to fire up to 800 rounds per minute--the rate of automatic weapons--and inflict maximum carnage," Feinstein wrote on Twitter Tuesday night. "I'm looking at ways to proceed with legislation to ban bump fire stocks...Doing nothing in the wake of this tragedy is not an option."
"I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
-- Washington Gov. Jay InsleeWashington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) joined Feinstein in calling for a ban on bump stocks and "other devices that turn legal semi-automatic firearms into lethal fully-automatic machine guns" in a statement on Tuesday.
"We must make sure people intent on causing mass destruction and loss of life won't be aided by lax laws that give them unfettered access to military-style weaponry," Inslee concluded. "To those who say we can't talk about machine gun massacres right after the massacre: I'm done waiting for the 'right time' to talk about it. The 'can't talk about it now' crowd is killing us."
Gun control advocates have joined this growing chorus of lawmakers, demanding more than thoughts and prayers.
"Hardware that turns legal guns into automatic weapons should be prohibited," Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, wrote on Tuesday. "Automatic weapons are highly regulated; this evades federal law."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy